Atualizado
Weis Wave Renko - Effort vs Result
ABOUT THIS SCRIPT
Weis Wave Renko – Effort vs Result indicatorcombines Renko price structure with Weis Wave volume analysis to help assess the relationship between market effort and price result.
This script is a fork and substantial extension of the original “Weis Wave Volume” script published by modhelius. Full credit is given to modhelius for the original Weis Wave calculation, Renko assignment methodology and histogram on which this version is based.
PURPOSE
The script was developed to support the following workflow:
It does not treat every Renko colour change as a trading signal. Instead, it is designed to help answer questions such as:
PIVOT STATISTICS
At each completed Renko peak or trough, the script displays:
The statistics box refers to the completed wave that formed that peak or trough.
The current uncompleted wave can also display a live statistics box. Live statistics remain provisional until the wave is completed by a confirmed change of direction.
WAVE COMMENTS
Each completed wave can receive a separate comment box connected to the centre of the relevant Renko leg.
The comment box may contain three distinct sections:
For example:
Buying climax confirmed
Demand expanding
Next up-wave retest failed below the climax high on lower volume
The primary wave classification describes the completed wave relative to the previous wave in the same direction.
The structural conclusion may update later as additional waves complete reflecting the dynamic nature of the indicator.
PRIMARY WAVE CLASSIFICATIONS
Up-waves are compared with the preceding completed up-wave:
Demand expanding - More volume accompanied by a longer rise.
Demand contracting - Less volume accompanied by a shorter rise.
Less effort needed to rise - Similar or lower volume produced the same or greater upward progress.
Buying effort absorbed - More volume produced a shorter rise, suggesting that buying effort encountered supply.
Down-waves are compared with the preceding completed down-wave:
Supply expanding - More volume accompanied by a longer decline.
Supply contracting - Less volume accompanied by a shorter decline.
Less support beneath price - Similar or lower volume produced the same or greater downward progress.
Selling effort absorbed - More volume produced a shorter decline, suggesting that selling effort encountered demand.
No material change - Neither volume nor price result changed sufficiently to exceed the selected Material Change Threshold.
CLIMAX ANALYSIS
A large wave is not classified as a confirmed climax merely because it has high volume. The script uses a staged process:
Possible buying climax:
Buying climax confirmed - [Primary up-wave classification]
Next up-wave retest failed below the climax high on lower volume - Possible selling climax
The comment can then state:
Selling climax confirmed - [Primary down-wave classification]
Next down-wave test held above the climax low on lower volume
Only the immediate next corresponding up-wave or down-wave is used for the test. The script does not search through later waves to find a result that retrospectively fits the climax interpretation.
NO SUPPLY AND NO DEMAND
Possible no supply requires a down-wave that:
Possible no demand requires an up-wave that:
The following down-wave must then sustain the selected number of reversal boxes.
These are rule-based interpretations of wave behaviour. They are not substitutes for a full Wyckoff or VSA analysis of background, location and market structure.
DEVELOPING WAVES
The current wave comment can update dynamically as volume and Renko-box count accumulate.
Developing comments use provisional wording such as:
A developing classification can change before the wave completes.
PROJECTION BOXES/BRICKS
TradingView can display projection boxes/bricks while the source-timeframe bar remains open.
Projection does not mean that the script is forecasting future bricks. It means that current price before the time period close has already moved far enough to meet one or more Renko thresholds during the still-open source bar.
For example, on a Daily Renko chart:
The same principle applies to Weekly and other source intervals.
Live statistics and developing comments should therefore be treated as provisional.
b]RENKO ASSIGNMENT METHODS
Traditional: Traditional uses a fixed price-unit assignment value.
If the TradingView chart is set to: Traditional box size = 3, the indicator should normally also be set to the same Renko Assignment Method = Traditional Value = 3
The script cannot automatically read the Renko box-size setting from the TradingView chart.
ATR: ATR derives the assignment value from Average True Range. The Value input represents the ATR lookback period rather than a fixed number of price points. ATR adapts to volatility, but changing box/brick size make historical box-count comparisons less directly uniform than Traditional sizing.
Part of Price: The inherited Part of Price method calculates close ÷ Value
For example: Value 20 = approximately 5% of price. This is not identical to TradingView’s Percentage LTP Renko setting.
DISPLAY AND POSITIONING
The script includes adjustable controls for:
Adjacent label and chart leg comment box stacking is optional. Because Pine cannot measure the rendered pixel width or height of labels, collision avoidance is based on bar distance and price-coordinate separation rather than exact screen-pixel boundaries. The user may need to adjust these settings in the user interface panel to avoid overlapping of labels and comment boxes.
SCENARIO KEY
The Scenario Key translates observable effort-and-result combinations into the primary wave comments used by the script.
The table also explains the structural sequences used for:
TIMEFRAME CONSIDERATIONS
Changing the TradingView chart timeframe changes the source data used to construct the Renko chart.
A Daily Renko structure and a Weekly Renko structure are therefore separate reconstructions, not merely different zoom levels of the same sequence.
Weekly charts may be useful for broad structural background.
Daily charts may provide more responsive directional changes.
Lower source intervals generally provide greater granularity but also produce more noise and more frequent projection box/brick changes.
LIMITATIONS
Renko charts use synthetic price construction.
The apparent Renko box/brick price is not always a directly tradable execution price.
Projection boxes/bricks can repaint while the source bar is open.
Historical calculations can change when:
This indicator should not be used to assume fills at ideal Renko box/brick prices.
Any strategy testing should use confirmed signals and actual market OHLC prices, with appropriate allowance for spread, slippage and execution delay.
The script provides analytical context. It does not provide financial advice or guarantee that any identified climax, test, no-supply condition, no-demand condition or Renko reversal will lead to a profitable trade.
CREDITS
Original Weis Wave Volume script and core calculation: modhelius
This version is an amended and extended fork incorporating:
DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT
The extended analytical concept implemented in this fork was developed following James Knox’s presentation to the "To The Tick" trading group on 20/7/26 combining:
The script’s classifications and dynamic comments were developed to make those relationships more easily visible directly on the Renko chart.
Weis Wave Renko – Effort vs Result indicatorcombines Renko price structure with Weis Wave volume analysis to help assess the relationship between market effort and price result.
This script is a fork and substantial extension of the original “Weis Wave Volume” script published by modhelius. Full credit is given to modhelius for the original Weis Wave calculation, Renko assignment methodology and histogram on which this version is based.
PURPOSE
The script was developed to support the following workflow:
- Use VSA/Wyckoff analysis to identify the market background and possible exhaustion, absorption or testing activity.
- Use Weis Wave volume to compare the effort behind successive buying and selling waves.
- Use Renko structure to confirm changes of direction, higher lows, lower highs and sustained reversals.
- Use the developing relationship between effort and result to assess whether supply or demand is strengthening, weakening or being absorbed.
- Where appropriate, use a confirmed Renko reversal as part of an entry, stop-placement or trade-management process.
It does not treat every Renko colour change as a trading signal. Instead, it is designed to help answer questions such as:
- Is demand expanding or contracting?
- Is supply expanding or contracting?
- Is price rising with less apparent selling resistance?
- Is price falling because support beneath the market is weak?
- Is increased volume producing less price progress?
- Does a high-volume wave represent a possible buying or selling climax?
- Has a later lower-volume test supported or rejected that interpretation?
- Effort = cumulative wave volume.
- Result = the price movement achieved by the Renko wave.
PIVOT STATISTICS
At each completed Renko peak or trough, the script displays:
- Weis Wave volume.
- Number of Renko boxes contained in the wave.
The statistics box refers to the completed wave that formed that peak or trough.
The current uncompleted wave can also display a live statistics box. Live statistics remain provisional until the wave is completed by a confirmed change of direction.
WAVE COMMENTS
Each completed wave can receive a separate comment box connected to the centre of the relevant Renko leg.
The comment box may contain three distinct sections:
- Structural conclusion.
- Primary wave classification from the Scenario Key.
- Explanation based on later price and volume behaviour.
For example:
Buying climax confirmed
Demand expanding
Next up-wave retest failed below the climax high on lower volume
The primary wave classification describes the completed wave relative to the previous wave in the same direction.
The structural conclusion may update later as additional waves complete reflecting the dynamic nature of the indicator.
PRIMARY WAVE CLASSIFICATIONS
Up-waves are compared with the preceding completed up-wave:
Demand expanding - More volume accompanied by a longer rise.
Demand contracting - Less volume accompanied by a shorter rise.
Less effort needed to rise - Similar or lower volume produced the same or greater upward progress.
Buying effort absorbed - More volume produced a shorter rise, suggesting that buying effort encountered supply.
Down-waves are compared with the preceding completed down-wave:
Supply expanding - More volume accompanied by a longer decline.
Supply contracting - Less volume accompanied by a shorter decline.
Less support beneath price - Similar or lower volume produced the same or greater downward progress.
Selling effort absorbed - More volume produced a shorter decline, suggesting that selling effort encountered demand.
No material change - Neither volume nor price result changed sufficiently to exceed the selected Material Change Threshold.
CLIMAX ANALYSIS
A large wave is not classified as a confirmed climax merely because it has high volume. The script uses a staged process:
Possible buying climax:
- An up-wave becomes a buying-climax candidate.
- The next down-wave must produce the selected Renko reversal confirmation, which defaults to three boxes.
- The immediately following up-wave is treated as the retest.
- The buying climax is confirmed only when that next up-wave:
- has lower volume than the original climax up-wave;
- produces a shorter rise; and
- fails below the climax high.
Buying climax confirmed - [Primary up-wave classification]
Next up-wave retest failed below the climax high on lower volume - Possible selling climax
- A down-wave becomes a selling-climax candidate.
- The next up-wave must produce the selected Renko reversal confirmation.
- The immediately following down-wave is treated as the test.
- The selling climax is confirmed only when that next down-wave:
- has lower volume than the original climax down-wave;
- produces a shorter decline; and
- holds above the climax low.
The comment can then state:
Selling climax confirmed - [Primary down-wave classification]
Next down-wave test held above the climax low on lower volume
Only the immediate next corresponding up-wave or down-wave is used for the test. The script does not search through later waves to find a result that retrospectively fits the climax interpretation.
NO SUPPLY AND NO DEMAND
Possible no supply requires a down-wave that:
- has lower volume than the previous down-wave;
- produces a shorter decline; and
- forms a higher low.
Possible no demand requires an up-wave that:
- has lower volume than the previous up-wave;
- produces a shorter rise; and
- forms a lower high.
The following down-wave must then sustain the selected number of reversal boxes.
These are rule-based interpretations of wave behaviour. They are not substitutes for a full Wyckoff or VSA analysis of background, location and market structure.
DEVELOPING WAVES
The current wave comment can update dynamically as volume and Renko-box count accumulate.
Developing comments use provisional wording such as:
- Demand currently expanding.
- Supply currently contracting.
- Buying effort currently absorbed.
- Possible no supply.
- Possible no demand.
A developing classification can change before the wave completes.
PROJECTION BOXES/BRICKS
TradingView can display projection boxes/bricks while the source-timeframe bar remains open.
Projection does not mean that the script is forecasting future bricks. It means that current price before the time period close has already moved far enough to meet one or more Renko thresholds during the still-open source bar.
For example, on a Daily Renko chart:
- intraday price movement can produce provisional Renko bricks;
- those bricks can appear before the Daily bar closes;
- they can change or disappear before the close;
- they become part of the confirmed historical Renko structure only after the source bar is confirmed.
The same principle applies to Weekly and other source intervals.
Live statistics and developing comments should therefore be treated as provisional.
b]RENKO ASSIGNMENT METHODS
Traditional: Traditional uses a fixed price-unit assignment value.
If the TradingView chart is set to: Traditional box size = 3, the indicator should normally also be set to the same Renko Assignment Method = Traditional Value = 3
The script cannot automatically read the Renko box-size setting from the TradingView chart.
ATR: ATR derives the assignment value from Average True Range. The Value input represents the ATR lookback period rather than a fixed number of price points. ATR adapts to volatility, but changing box/brick size make historical box-count comparisons less directly uniform than Traditional sizing.
Part of Price: The inherited Part of Price method calculates close ÷ Value
For example: Value 20 = approximately 5% of price. This is not identical to TradingView’s Percentage LTP Renko setting.
DISPLAY AND POSITIONING
The script includes adjustable controls for:
- up-wave and down-wave histogram colours;
- histogram transparency;
- pivot statistics placement;
- statistics font size;
- statistics connector lines;
- adjacent statistics-label stacking;
- wave-comment font size and line wrapping;
- wave-comment vertical and horizontal offsets;
- adjacent wave-comment stacking;
- comment connector lines;
- Permanent Note position and dimensions;
- Scenario Key position and dimensions.
Adjacent label and chart leg comment box stacking is optional. Because Pine cannot measure the rendered pixel width or height of labels, collision avoidance is based on bar distance and price-coordinate separation rather than exact screen-pixel boundaries. The user may need to adjust these settings in the user interface panel to avoid overlapping of labels and comment boxes.
SCENARIO KEY
The Scenario Key translates observable effort-and-result combinations into the primary wave comments used by the script.
The table also explains the structural sequences used for:
- climax candidates;
- confirmed buying and selling climaxes;
- possible no supply;
- possible no demand;
- failed follow-through;
- provisional current-wave conclusions.
TIMEFRAME CONSIDERATIONS
Changing the TradingView chart timeframe changes the source data used to construct the Renko chart.
A Daily Renko structure and a Weekly Renko structure are therefore separate reconstructions, not merely different zoom levels of the same sequence.
Weekly charts may be useful for broad structural background.
Daily charts may provide more responsive directional changes.
Lower source intervals generally provide greater granularity but also produce more noise and more frequent projection box/brick changes.
LIMITATIONS
Renko charts use synthetic price construction.
The apparent Renko box/brick price is not always a directly tradable execution price.
Projection boxes/bricks can repaint while the source bar is open.
Historical calculations can change when:
- the chart timeframe changes;
- Renko settings change;
- indicator assignment settings change;
- additional lower-timeframe data becomes available;
- TradingView reconstructs the Renko history.
This indicator should not be used to assume fills at ideal Renko box/brick prices.
Any strategy testing should use confirmed signals and actual market OHLC prices, with appropriate allowance for spread, slippage and execution delay.
The script provides analytical context. It does not provide financial advice or guarantee that any identified climax, test, no-supply condition, no-demand condition or Renko reversal will lead to a profitable trade.
CREDITS
Original Weis Wave Volume script and core calculation: modhelius
This version is an amended and extended fork incorporating:
- Renko peak and trough statistics;
- wave box counts;
- dynamic wave comments;
- effort-versus-result classifications;
- climax and test sequencing;
- no-supply and no-demand analysis;
- projection-brick context;
- configurable display, positioning and overlap-management controls.
DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT
The extended analytical concept implemented in this fork was developed following James Knox’s presentation to the "To The Tick" trading group on 20/7/26 combining:
- TradeGuider VSA observations;
- Wyckoff concepts of effort versus result, climaxes, tests, springs, no supply and no demand;
- Weis Wave volume;
- Renko changes of direction and structural pivots.
The script’s classifications and dynamic comments were developed to make those relationships more easily visible directly on the Renko chart.
Notas de Lançamento
Additional explanations:Oscillating check box
- Unchecked: both up-wave and down-wave histogram columns plot above zero.
- Checked: up-waves remain above zero, while down-waves plot below zero.
It is purely a histogram-display choice. It does not change wave detection, statistics, comments, climax logic, no-supply/no-demand logic or box counts.
Normalize check box
- Unchecked: the histogram and statistics label show the cumulative effort for the whole wave.
- Checked: cumulative effort is divided by the number of chart bars in that wave, producing average effort per bar.
So, approximately: Normalised value = total wave volume ÷ bars in wave
This reduces the natural tendency of longer waves to accumulate larger volume totals.
Normalize only changes the histogram and displayed statistics value. The effort-versus-result comments, climax tests and structural comparisons still use the full cumulative volume. Consequently, enabling Normalize can make the displayed `Vol` figure differ from the volume actually used by the analytical logic.
When Use True Range instead of Volume is active, the same controls apply to True Range rather than actual volume:
- Normalize off = cumulative True Range for the wave.
- Normalize on = average True Range per bar.
For this indicator’s intended Weis Wave/VSA/Wyckoff use, it is recommended to leave both Oscillating and Normalize unchecked:
- Oscillating is merely personal display preference.
- Normalize should remain off because conventional Weis Wave analysis compares cumulative wave effort, which is also what the script’s comments analyse.
Other matters:
- Added bounded alternating/inward stacking for statistics and wave-comment labels, reducing vertical scale expansion.
- Added statistics typeface selection, bold formatting and text-colour control.
- Added bold formatting for wave-comment text.
- Aligned Scenario Key wording with chart-comment wording, while retaining 23 scenarios.
- Made Scenario Key text left-aligned with user-controlled wrapping, column widths, font size and row height.
- Updated the Note, Scenario Key, label spacing and display defaults.
Notas de Lançamento
Notes on Controls:Oscillating check box
- Unchecked: both up-wave and down-wave histogram columns plot above zero.
- Checked: up-waves remain above zero, while down-waves plot below zero.
It is purely a histogram-display choice. It does not change wave detection, statistics, comments, climax logic, no-supply/no-demand logic or box counts.
Normalize check box
- Unchecked: the histogram and statistics label show the cumulative effort for the whole wave.
- Checked: cumulative effort is divided by the number of chart bars in that wave, producing average effort per bar.
So, approximately: Normalised value = total wave volume ÷ bars in wave
This reduces the natural tendency of longer waves to accumulate larger volume totals.
Normalize only changes the histogram and displayed statistics value. The effort-versus-result comments, climax tests and structural comparisons still use the full cumulative volume. Consequently, enabling Normalize can make the displayed `Vol` figure differ from the volume actually used by the analytical logic.
When Use True Range instead of Volume is active, the same controls apply to True Range rather than actual volume:
- Normalize off = cumulative True Range for the wave.
- Normalize on = average True Range per bar.
For this indicator’s intended Weis Wave/VSA/Wyckoff use, it is recommended to leave both Oscillating and Normalize unchecked:
- Oscillating is merely personal display preference.
- Normalize should remain off because conventional Weis Wave analysis compares cumulative wave effort, which is also what the script’s comments analyse.
Updates this version:
- Added bounded alternating/inward stacking for statistics and wave-comment labels, reducing vertical scale expansion.
- Added statistics typeface selection, bold formatting and text-colour control.
- Added bold formatting for wave-comment text.
- Aligned Scenario Key wording with chart-comment wording, while retaining 23 scenarios.
- Made Scenario Key text left-aligned with user-controlled wrapping, column widths, font size and row height.
- Updated the Note, Scenario Key, label spacing and display defaults to match the agreed settings.
Refined display and layout controls.
- This update improves the Permanent Note and 23-row Scenario Key by applying responsive word wrapping, top-left body-text alignment and consistent use of the adjustable column widths, character limits, font size and row-height settings.
- The opening defaults for the Note and Scenario Key have been recalibrated so both tables fit more effectively within the main chart pane.
- Statistics-label and wave-comment text now default to true black, RGB(0, 0, 0), for improved contrast and readability.
- No changes have been made to the Weis Wave calculation, effort-versus-result classifications, structural confirmation logic or histogram output.
Notas de Lançamento
Minor Scenario Logic changes and correctionsNotas de Lançamento
Republication update — 30 July 2026This update focuses on chart readability, label separation and responsive table layout.
Statistics-label controls
- Added separate fill-colour controls for up-wave and down-wave statistics labels.
- Added separate fill-transparency controls for completed and developing statistics labels.
- Existing statistics connector-line colours and behaviour remain unchanged.
Automatic statistics-label separation
- Statistics labels are now positioned before wave-comment boxes.
- Each statistics label is compared with the preceding label in the same wave direction.
- Estimated label width, height, font size, text length, pivot position and horizontal bar separation are considered.
- A label is staggered only when its estimated horizontal and vertical ranges would otherwise collide.
- Peak and Trough Vertical Distance remain the minimum distances from their respective wave extremes.
- Required separation is measured between estimated label edges rather than label centres.
Automatic wave-comment separation
- Wave comments are positioned after the statistics-label positions have been finalised.
- Each comment is compared with the preceding comment in the same wave direction.
- Comments are staggered only when their estimated horizontal and vertical ranges would collide.
- Wrapped line count, font size, text width and anchor-bar distance are included in the calculation.
- Comment staggering no longer moves its associated statistics label.
- Statistics-to-comment spacing is calculated from the estimated edges of both objects to provide more consistent visible clearance.
Scenario Key layout
- Removed the fixed height previously applied to every Scenario Key row.
- Each row now determines its height automatically from its wrapped content.
- Short one-line rows remain compact while longer rows expand only as required.
- Scenario and Wave Comment column widths remain independently adjustable.
- Opening wrap defaults are now:
- Scenario maximum characters per line: 42
- Comment maximum characters per line: 31
Permanent Note layout
- Removed the fixed Note height.
- Note height now adjusts automatically to the wrapped text.
- The Note retains an adjustable percentage width so it can be aligned with the overall Scenario Key width.
- * Final opening defaults are:
- Font size: 14
- Maximum characters per line: 61
- Width: 15.05% of pane
- Background transparency: 5
- Frame thickness: 1
No changes have been made to the Weis Wave calculation, Renko wave construction, effort-versus-result classifications, structural scenario logic, scenario wording or exported Wave Volume histogram.
Notas de Lançamento
Update — 4th August 2026 — v.41RENKO WAVE OVERLAY ON CONVENTIONAL PRICE CHARTS
The indicator can now superimpose its Renko-derived Weis Wave structure over a candlestick chart for comparison with price bars, volume and VSA.
The overlay can display:
- Completed Renko up-waves and down-waves.
- The current developing wave.
- Completed-wave volume and box-count statistics.
- Completed and developing wave comments.
- Short reversals occurring within one conventional bar.
Wave direction, pivots, statistics and comments are derived from TradingView’s Renko data context. Event sequencing has also been refined to improve correspondence with the equivalent native Renko chart.
DEFAULT SET-UP FOR THE PRICE-CHART OVERLAY
The default opening settings still assume use on a native Renko chart.
To view the new overlay clearly:
- Change the chart type from Renko to Candles.
- Open the indicator settings.
- Uncheck “Show Completed Wave Comments”.
- Check “Show Renko Wave Overlay” near the end of the Inputs.
- Click OK.
- If preferred, open Defaults and select “Save as default”.
Hiding completed-wave comments prevents their text boxes obscuring the price bars. Statistics labels may remain visible.
CHART DISPLAY AND TIME FRAMES
Use the mouse scroll wheel to adjust horizontal spread. Drag the price scale in manual mode to alter the vertical range, or select Auto.
The overlay can be used on any interval, but has been checked principally on:
- 4-hour charts.
- Daily charts.
- Weekly charts.
These are the recommended intervals. Lower intervals may appear congested.
ENHANCED DISPLAY CONTROLS
Controls include:
- Overlay, comment and statistics visibility.
- Separate up-wave and down-wave colours.
- Separate completed/developing line styles, widths and transparency.
- Separate statistics-label fill colours and transparency.
- Adjustable label, comment and connector positioning.
- Scenario Key and Permanent Note controls.
CURRENT DEVELOPING WAVE
The current wave can be displayed on conventional and native Renko charts. Its line, statistics and comment update while provisional. Once an opposing movement confirms completion, the wave is fixed at the confirmed pivot with its final volume and box count, and a new developing wave begins. Multiple direction changes within one conventional bar are retained chronologically.
LOWER-PANE WEIS WAVE HISTOGRAM
The lower pane now uses TradingView’s native columns. On a conventional chart:
- One Weis Wave Volume column is shown for every price bar.
- Each column is centred beneath, and follows the width of, its price bar.
- The histogram resizes with chart zoom.
- Values remain consistent with the Data Window and CSV-exportable “Wave Volume” series.
IMPORTANT — CONVENTIONAL PRICE-CHART INTERPRETATION
Each histogram column shows the Weis Wave state known at that price bar’s close. A Renko reversal may only be confirmed later, after which the completed overlay and statistics are positioned retrospectively at the actual Renko peak or trough.
Consequently:
- A column near a reversal may retain the preceding wave colour.
- Red may appear beneath a subsequently confirmed up-wave, or green beneath a subsequently confirmed down-wave.
- A histogram value may differ from the final completed-wave volume.
- A confirmed pivot may align with the edge rather than the centre of its histogram column.
These effects arise from mapping event-based Renko movement onto fixed time bars and do not indicate an error in the completed-wave calculation.
Completed-wave statistics labels are authoritative for final volume, box count and confirmed pivot. The lower histogram represents the developing Weis Wave state at each conventional bar close.
On a native Renko chart, the wave structure and histogram share the same Renko bars, so direction, colour, volume, statistics and pivots correspond more directly.
Aviso legal
As informações e publicações não se destinam a ser, e não constituem, conselhos ou recomendações financeiras, de investimento, comerciais ou de outro tipo fornecidos ou endossados pela TradingView. Leia mais nos Termos de Uso.
Aviso legal
As informações e publicações não se destinam a ser, e não constituem, conselhos ou recomendações financeiras, de investimento, comerciais ou de outro tipo fornecidos ou endossados pela TradingView. Leia mais nos Termos de Uso.