OPEN-SOURCE SCRIPT
RS Rating vs Index
RS Rating vs Index — Sector & Market
Tracks how a stock is really performing — not just whether the price is going up, but whether it's beating the market and its own sector.
Most relative-strength tools only compare a stock to one benchmark. This one runs two comparisons at the same time: the stock against its sector index (e.g. CSL vs XHJ) and against the broader market (default XJO). That distinction matters more than people give it credit for. A stock can look strong purely because its whole sector is hot — this indicator lets you see through that and tell whether a name is actually leading its peers, or just along for the ride.
The rating itself is built the IBD way: weighted quarterly price performance with the most recent quarter counted double, then scaled to a 0–100 read using the stock's own trailing history. Above 70 and it's showing real strength versus the benchmark; below 30 and it's lagging.
One honest caveat: this isn't a true cross-sectional RS Rating like you'd get from IBD's full universe ranking — Pine indicators can't see every other stock on the exchange at once. What you're getting is each stock ranked against its own history of relative performance, which in practice tracks strength and weakness pretty closely, just without the "top 1% of 3,000 stocks" precision.
Set your own sector benchmark in the settings — defaults are ASX sector indices, but it'll work on any exchange if you swap the symbols.
Tracks how a stock is really performing — not just whether the price is going up, but whether it's beating the market and its own sector.
Most relative-strength tools only compare a stock to one benchmark. This one runs two comparisons at the same time: the stock against its sector index (e.g. CSL vs XHJ) and against the broader market (default XJO). That distinction matters more than people give it credit for. A stock can look strong purely because its whole sector is hot — this indicator lets you see through that and tell whether a name is actually leading its peers, or just along for the ride.
The rating itself is built the IBD way: weighted quarterly price performance with the most recent quarter counted double, then scaled to a 0–100 read using the stock's own trailing history. Above 70 and it's showing real strength versus the benchmark; below 30 and it's lagging.
One honest caveat: this isn't a true cross-sectional RS Rating like you'd get from IBD's full universe ranking — Pine indicators can't see every other stock on the exchange at once. What you're getting is each stock ranked against its own history of relative performance, which in practice tracks strength and weakness pretty closely, just without the "top 1% of 3,000 stocks" precision.
Set your own sector benchmark in the settings — defaults are ASX sector indices, but it'll work on any exchange if you swap the symbols.
开源脚本
秉承TradingView的精神，该脚本的作者将其开源，以便交易者可以查看和验证其功能。向作者致敬！您可以免费使用该脚本，但请记住，重新发布代码须遵守我们的网站规则。
免责声明
这些信息和出版物并非旨在提供，也不构成TradingView提供或认可的任何形式的财务、投资、交易或其他类型的建议或推荐。请阅读使用条款了解更多信息。
免责声明
这些信息和出版物并非旨在提供，也不构成TradingView提供或认可的任何形式的财务、投资、交易或其他类型的建议或推荐。请阅读使用条款了解更多信息。