OPEN-SOURCE SCRIPT
Actualizado Anchored VWAP Reversion Channel

Anchored VWAP Reversion Channel — Regime-Gated Fade Framework
## What this script does
This is an **analytical study** that frames mean-reversion ("fade") setups around an **anchored, volume-weighted regression channel**, then **gates** those setups by a statistical market-state test and **scores** them against their own forward outcomes. It does not place orders and it is not a signal service — its purpose is to let you see, on your own instrument and timeframe, whether fading a stretched move actually has an edge, instead of assuming it does.
It plots one channel (a centre line plus inner/outer residual-σ bands), marks fade setups at the outer band, draws supporting context (volume-profile POC / value area, untested prior-session POCs, momentum divergences, liquidity sweeps, and multi-timeframe trend lines), and reports a compact validation panel.
## Why these components are combined (mashup rationale)
Fading an extreme is really three separate questions, and no single classic indicator answers all three. Stacking look-alike indicators just echoes one input, so this tool deliberately combines **three non-redundant lenses and makes them check each other**:
1. **WHERE is price stretched?** — A **volume-weighted polynomial regression** anchored at the most recent swing pivot, with **residual-σ bands**. Because the curve tilts with the active leg, an outer-band tag stays meaningful even inside a trend, where a flat cumulative VWAP would not. A **volume profile** anchored to the *same* window supplies POC and value area, and prior-session POCs that have never since been traded through become **reversion targets**.
2. **Is a reversion actually firing here?** — Three orthogonal **tells** evaluated only at the band: a **close-back rejection**, a **band-confluent momentum divergence**, and an **equal-high/low liquidity sweep** (stop-run). Crucially, all three are derived from the same stretch, so their agreement is shrunk by a **design-effect correction** (effective-sample-size): three correlated echoes are not allowed to masquerade as three independent confirmations.
3. **Is the market in a reverting state at all?** — A **regime gate** combining a **variance-ratio test** and a **reversion-trust correlation** only lets a fade through when recent increments are offsetting (mean-reverting) rather than compounding (trending).
The pieces are not bolted together side by side: they share **one geometry** (the anchored channel) and **one volatility unit** (residual σ / ATR), and each can veto the others. A band tag with no tell does nothing; a tell with no reverting regime does nothing. The design goal is to **suppress** low-quality fades — into a trend, mid-range, or backed by a single echoed tell — more than to generate them.
## The honesty layer (what makes this more than a drawing)
Every fade that fires is logged and, a fixed horizon later, **resolved**: its forward return is measured in ATR units and tabulated **with the regime gate ON versus OFF**, reporting follow-through %, whipsaw %, a Wilson 95% confidence interval, and the **mean return per fade**. A per-fade series also exports to the Data Window so you can study the full return distribution offline. The gate has to **beat its own ungated baseline** to justify itself — the framework is built to be tested, not trusted blindly.
## How to use it
1. Set the **Price source** (group 01). It works on any symbol and any market; volume-based parts need a real volume feed.
2. A fade **arms** when price tags the outer band **and** at least one tell prints, then **passes** only if the regime gate reports a reverting state. Solid triangles are gated fades; the target is the centre line or the nearest untested POC.
3. Read the panel top-down: does **Gate ON** beat **Gate OFF** on both follow-through and mean R, with non-overlapping intervals and a reasonable sample size? If not, the edge is not present on this symbol/timeframe — change them rather than forcing the trade.
4. The signal lives on **higher intraday timeframes**; one-minute data is mostly noise.
## Defaults
Shipped tuned for **NSE:NIFTY** index futures on intraday timeframes (sources, pivot lengths, value-area %, and the Tuesday-style weekly session context reflect that instrument). Every value is exposed as an input — change the **Price source** and the relevant lengths to run the framework on any other instrument or market.
## What is original
The original work is the **coordination**, not any single formula: an anchored polynomial-regression channel used as a reversion frame, three decorrelated band tells fused by a design-effect shrink, a statistical regime gate, and a built-in A/B + forward-return validation harness — combined so each lens can veto the others and the whole thing reports its own hit rate. It is not a re-skin of one indicator.
## Concept credits (techniques are standard; this implementation is original)
Anchored VWAP (standard); volume-weighted least-squares / polynomial regression (standard); residual-σ channel (standard); Volume Profile, Value Area and POC — Market Profile, Steidlmayer / CBOT; Variance-Ratio test — Lo & MacKinlay (1988); design effect / effective sample size — Kish (1965); proportion confidence interval — Wilson (1927); ATR trailing stop / Supertrend (classic, used for the multi-timeframe context lines); RSI — Wilder; Stochastic — Lane.
## Disclaimer
For research and education only. This is an analytical study, **not** financial advice, **not** a recommendation, and **not** a guarantee of future results. All statistics shown are **in-sample** on loaded history, close-to-close, without costs or slippage — a study aid, not a backtest. Mean reversion fails in trends and through regime breaks. Do your own research and manage your own risk.
## What this script does
This is an **analytical study** that frames mean-reversion ("fade") setups around an **anchored, volume-weighted regression channel**, then **gates** those setups by a statistical market-state test and **scores** them against their own forward outcomes. It does not place orders and it is not a signal service — its purpose is to let you see, on your own instrument and timeframe, whether fading a stretched move actually has an edge, instead of assuming it does.
It plots one channel (a centre line plus inner/outer residual-σ bands), marks fade setups at the outer band, draws supporting context (volume-profile POC / value area, untested prior-session POCs, momentum divergences, liquidity sweeps, and multi-timeframe trend lines), and reports a compact validation panel.
## Why these components are combined (mashup rationale)
Fading an extreme is really three separate questions, and no single classic indicator answers all three. Stacking look-alike indicators just echoes one input, so this tool deliberately combines **three non-redundant lenses and makes them check each other**:
1. **WHERE is price stretched?** — A **volume-weighted polynomial regression** anchored at the most recent swing pivot, with **residual-σ bands**. Because the curve tilts with the active leg, an outer-band tag stays meaningful even inside a trend, where a flat cumulative VWAP would not. A **volume profile** anchored to the *same* window supplies POC and value area, and prior-session POCs that have never since been traded through become **reversion targets**.
2. **Is a reversion actually firing here?** — Three orthogonal **tells** evaluated only at the band: a **close-back rejection**, a **band-confluent momentum divergence**, and an **equal-high/low liquidity sweep** (stop-run). Crucially, all three are derived from the same stretch, so their agreement is shrunk by a **design-effect correction** (effective-sample-size): three correlated echoes are not allowed to masquerade as three independent confirmations.
3. **Is the market in a reverting state at all?** — A **regime gate** combining a **variance-ratio test** and a **reversion-trust correlation** only lets a fade through when recent increments are offsetting (mean-reverting) rather than compounding (trending).
The pieces are not bolted together side by side: they share **one geometry** (the anchored channel) and **one volatility unit** (residual σ / ATR), and each can veto the others. A band tag with no tell does nothing; a tell with no reverting regime does nothing. The design goal is to **suppress** low-quality fades — into a trend, mid-range, or backed by a single echoed tell — more than to generate them.
## The honesty layer (what makes this more than a drawing)
Every fade that fires is logged and, a fixed horizon later, **resolved**: its forward return is measured in ATR units and tabulated **with the regime gate ON versus OFF**, reporting follow-through %, whipsaw %, a Wilson 95% confidence interval, and the **mean return per fade**. A per-fade series also exports to the Data Window so you can study the full return distribution offline. The gate has to **beat its own ungated baseline** to justify itself — the framework is built to be tested, not trusted blindly.
## How to use it
1. Set the **Price source** (group 01). It works on any symbol and any market; volume-based parts need a real volume feed.
2. A fade **arms** when price tags the outer band **and** at least one tell prints, then **passes** only if the regime gate reports a reverting state. Solid triangles are gated fades; the target is the centre line or the nearest untested POC.
3. Read the panel top-down: does **Gate ON** beat **Gate OFF** on both follow-through and mean R, with non-overlapping intervals and a reasonable sample size? If not, the edge is not present on this symbol/timeframe — change them rather than forcing the trade.
4. The signal lives on **higher intraday timeframes**; one-minute data is mostly noise.
## Defaults
Shipped tuned for **NSE:NIFTY** index futures on intraday timeframes (sources, pivot lengths, value-area %, and the Tuesday-style weekly session context reflect that instrument). Every value is exposed as an input — change the **Price source** and the relevant lengths to run the framework on any other instrument or market.
## What is original
The original work is the **coordination**, not any single formula: an anchored polynomial-regression channel used as a reversion frame, three decorrelated band tells fused by a design-effect shrink, a statistical regime gate, and a built-in A/B + forward-return validation harness — combined so each lens can veto the others and the whole thing reports its own hit rate. It is not a re-skin of one indicator.
## Concept credits (techniques are standard; this implementation is original)
Anchored VWAP (standard); volume-weighted least-squares / polynomial regression (standard); residual-σ channel (standard); Volume Profile, Value Area and POC — Market Profile, Steidlmayer / CBOT; Variance-Ratio test — Lo & MacKinlay (1988); design effect / effective sample size — Kish (1965); proportion confidence interval — Wilson (1927); ATR trailing stop / Supertrend (classic, used for the multi-timeframe context lines); RSI — Wilder; Stochastic — Lane.
## Disclaimer
For research and education only. This is an analytical study, **not** financial advice, **not** a recommendation, and **not** a guarantee of future results. All statistics shown are **in-sample** on loaded history, close-to-close, without costs or slippage — a study aid, not a backtest. Mean reversion fails in trends and through regime breaks. Do your own research and manage your own risk.
Notas de prensa
Just Minor updateNotas de prensa
Major upgrade — added a multi-factor confluence layer and made the framework fully cross-asset.New in this version:
Multi-factor confluence (new fade tell). Nine independent "is price stretched?" factors — fair value (VWAP deviation), volatility (range), efficiency, positioning (basis), trend extension (SAR/ATR), momentum (RSI/Stoch-RSI), equilibrium (linreg deviation), cycle (KST) and order flow (volume delta) — are standardized onto one shared σ scale. The framework now counts how many sit at the extreme at once (their consensus) and uses that breadth read as a fourth, independent tell alongside rejection, divergence and the liquidity sweep. It is kept separate from the single-oscillator divergence so momentum isn't counted twice, and the existing design-effect shrink still stops correlated tells from inflating confidence.
Consensus extreme marks on price — a dot on each extreme bar and an "Ext N" tag (N = factors stretched) when a new consensus run begins. Threshold is timeframe-adaptive (4 / 3 / 2 by resolution) and auto-clamped to the active-factor count.
Divergence kept sharp and selectable — the band-gated momentum divergence now offers Stoch RSI or RSI on a single series (not a blended composite), so clean divergences aren't washed out.
Fully configurable raw-data sources — price, high, low, the positioning reference symbol and the VWAP source are all inputs, so the tool runs on any instrument in any market. Factors whose data is unavailable (no volume → VWAP / order-flow; no reference symbol → positioning) are skipped automatically.
Theme-adaptive dashboard — the panel reads the chart-background luminance and stays legible on light or dark themes.
Unchanged core: the anchored volume-weighted regression channel with residual-σ bands, the anchored volume profile and naked-POC magnets, the regime gate, and the A/B + forward-return validation harness that scores Gate ON vs OFF.
As always, this is context/confirmation, not a trigger — and because several factors share inputs, a high consensus count overstates true independence. Let the A/B scoreboard and the per-fade R export decide whether it earns its place on your symbol and timeframe. Educational only; not financial advice.
Script de código abierto
Fiel al espíritu de TradingView, el creador de este script lo ha convertido en código abierto, para que los traders puedan revisar y verificar su funcionalidad. ¡Enhorabuena al autor! Aunque puede utilizarlo de forma gratuita, recuerde que cualquier republicación del código está sujeta a nuestras Normas internas.
Exención de responsabilidad
La información y las publicaciones no constituyen, ni deben considerarse como, asesoramiento o recomendaciones financieras, de inversión, de trading u otro tipo, proporcionadas o respaldadas por TradingView. Obtenga más información en Condiciones de uso.
Script de código abierto
Fiel al espíritu de TradingView, el creador de este script lo ha convertido en código abierto, para que los traders puedan revisar y verificar su funcionalidad. ¡Enhorabuena al autor! Aunque puede utilizarlo de forma gratuita, recuerde que cualquier republicación del código está sujeta a nuestras Normas internas.
Exención de responsabilidad
La información y las publicaciones no constituyen, ni deben considerarse como, asesoramiento o recomendaciones financieras, de inversión, de trading u otro tipo, proporcionadas o respaldadas por TradingView. Obtenga más información en Condiciones de uso.