OPEN-SOURCE SCRIPT
QuantLine Geometric Conflict Lite V2
QuantLine Geometric Conflict Lite asks one question: where is BTC inside its own range —
and where are the alts inside theirs?
If BTC sits near the TOP of its range while most alts sit near the BOTTOM of theirs,
"long the alt off support" setups can look valid but often rest on borrowed strength —
BTC simply has not rolled over yet.
How it is calculated:
For each asset, position inside its own range on a chosen timeframe (default 4H):
pos = (last - range_low) / (range_high - range_low)
• 0 = at support (floor) · 1 = at resistance (ceiling) · 0.5 = mid-range
Headline metric — gap in percentage points:
conflict = (btc_pos - median(alt_pos)) * 100
Verdict (default ±30 pp — user-adjustable hypothesis, not a validated signal):
• ≥ +threshold → CONFLICT: BTC near ceiling, alts near floor. Handle alt support longs
with care.
• ≤ -threshold → INVERSE: mirror — BTC low, alts high.
• between → AGREEMENT: same part of their ranges — no contradiction.
Details:
• Degenerate ranges dropped if width < min % of price (default 0.5%).
• "Alts at floor N/M" counts basket members with pos ≤ 0.33.
• Basket is a fixed set of major crypto pairs, editable in settings. Keep it crypto —
session-gapped stock tickers distort a 24/7 breadth read.
Why this is not just a mashup of unrelated plots:
It measures one breadth relationship (BTC range position vs median alt range position)
and turns it into a single readable gap + verdict. Teaching lens for "whose strength is
this move standing on?" — not an entry system.
No entries, stops, or targets. No liquidation/OI/on-chain data. Not financial advice.
and where are the alts inside theirs?
If BTC sits near the TOP of its range while most alts sit near the BOTTOM of theirs,
"long the alt off support" setups can look valid but often rest on borrowed strength —
BTC simply has not rolled over yet.
How it is calculated:
For each asset, position inside its own range on a chosen timeframe (default 4H):
pos = (last - range_low) / (range_high - range_low)
• 0 = at support (floor) · 1 = at resistance (ceiling) · 0.5 = mid-range
Headline metric — gap in percentage points:
conflict = (btc_pos - median(alt_pos)) * 100
Verdict (default ±30 pp — user-adjustable hypothesis, not a validated signal):
• ≥ +threshold → CONFLICT: BTC near ceiling, alts near floor. Handle alt support longs
with care.
• ≤ -threshold → INVERSE: mirror — BTC low, alts high.
• between → AGREEMENT: same part of their ranges — no contradiction.
Details:
• Degenerate ranges dropped if width < min % of price (default 0.5%).
• "Alts at floor N/M" counts basket members with pos ≤ 0.33.
• Basket is a fixed set of major crypto pairs, editable in settings. Keep it crypto —
session-gapped stock tickers distort a 24/7 breadth read.
Why this is not just a mashup of unrelated plots:
It measures one breadth relationship (BTC range position vs median alt range position)
and turns it into a single readable gap + verdict. Teaching lens for "whose strength is
this move standing on?" — not an entry system.
No entries, stops, or targets. No liquidation/OI/on-chain data. Not financial advice.
オープンソーススクリプト
TradingViewの精神に則り、このスクリプトの作者はコードをオープンソースとして公開してくれました。トレーダーが内容を確認・検証できるようにという配慮です。作者に拍手を送りましょう！無料で利用できますが、コードの再公開はハウスルールに従う必要があります。
免責事項
これらの情報および投稿は、TradingViewが提供または承認する金融、投資、取引、またはその他の種類の助言もしくは推奨であることを意図したものではなく、またこれらに該当するものでもありません。詳細は利用規約をご覧ください。
オープンソーススクリプト
TradingViewの精神に則り、このスクリプトの作者はコードをオープンソースとして公開してくれました。トレーダーが内容を確認・検証できるようにという配慮です。作者に拍手を送りましょう！無料で利用できますが、コードの再公開はハウスルールに従う必要があります。
免責事項
これらの情報および投稿は、TradingViewが提供または承認する金融、投資、取引、またはその他の種類の助言もしくは推奨であることを意図したものではなく、またこれらに該当するものでもありません。詳細は利用規約をご覧ください。