In the wild west of Solana meme coins, some absolute degen just pulled off one of the cleanest governance heists of the cycle
He bought $4.4 million worth of BONK across Bybit and Binance, accumulated enough voting power to meet the DAO quorum, and then voted in favor of transferring 4.426 trillion BONK (worth about $21.2 million) from the treasury to his own wallet! There were no exploits or smart contract hacks just governance working exactly as designed.
By the time the proposal executed, the treasury was drained and the trader walked away with an estimated $16.8 million profit
The move centered around proposal BIP #76, which effectively requested that the treasury funds be sent to the proposer's wallet. To ensure it passed, he accumulated roughly 882 billion BONK, exceeding the 880 billion token quorum requirement. Over the course of two days, he steadily bought tokens, deposited them from exchanges, and ultimately cast a single YES vote that accounted for 99.9% of the voting weight
With little opposition or participation from the broader community, quorum was reached, the proposal passed, and the treasury transfer was executed automatically
The aftermath has split the crypto community.. Some argue that he simply played by the rules and exposed a flawed governance design, while others view it as the DAO effectively rugging itself. Reports indicate that around 40 billion BONK has already been moved to OKX for partial profit taking, while the remaining tokens remain in the recipient wallet awaiting the next move.
Rather than being a traditional hack, the incident has become an example of how poorly designed governance systems can be exploited without breaking any rules
The incident has sparked wider debate across Crypto Twitter and among DAO builders
Many projects are now re evaluating their governance parameters, particularly quorum requirements, after seeing how a treasury can become vulnerable if acquiring enough voting power costs less than the assets it controls. The episode serves as a reminder that governance security is just as important as smart contract security because if buying the votes is cheaper than the treasury itself, someone will eventually treat the DAO like a personal ATM
After spending over a decade in crypto, one thing is clear, the new generation of exploits isn't about breaking code..it's about outsmarting the systems built around it. With AI accelerating research and strategy, attackers are increasingly beating developers at their own game
He bought $4.4 million worth of BONK across Bybit and Binance, accumulated enough voting power to meet the DAO quorum, and then voted in favor of transferring 4.426 trillion BONK (worth about $21.2 million) from the treasury to his own wallet! There were no exploits or smart contract hacks just governance working exactly as designed.
By the time the proposal executed, the treasury was drained and the trader walked away with an estimated $16.8 million profit
The move centered around proposal BIP #76, which effectively requested that the treasury funds be sent to the proposer's wallet. To ensure it passed, he accumulated roughly 882 billion BONK, exceeding the 880 billion token quorum requirement. Over the course of two days, he steadily bought tokens, deposited them from exchanges, and ultimately cast a single YES vote that accounted for 99.9% of the voting weight
With little opposition or participation from the broader community, quorum was reached, the proposal passed, and the treasury transfer was executed automatically
The aftermath has split the crypto community.. Some argue that he simply played by the rules and exposed a flawed governance design, while others view it as the DAO effectively rugging itself. Reports indicate that around 40 billion BONK has already been moved to OKX for partial profit taking, while the remaining tokens remain in the recipient wallet awaiting the next move.
Rather than being a traditional hack, the incident has become an example of how poorly designed governance systems can be exploited without breaking any rules
The incident has sparked wider debate across Crypto Twitter and among DAO builders
Many projects are now re evaluating their governance parameters, particularly quorum requirements, after seeing how a treasury can become vulnerable if acquiring enough voting power costs less than the assets it controls. The episode serves as a reminder that governance security is just as important as smart contract security because if buying the votes is cheaper than the treasury itself, someone will eventually treat the DAO like a personal ATM
After spending over a decade in crypto, one thing is clear, the new generation of exploits isn't about breaking code..it's about outsmarting the systems built around it. With AI accelerating research and strategy, attackers are increasingly beating developers at their own game
관련 발행물
면책사항
해당 정보와 게시물은 금융, 투자, 트레이딩 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권장 사항으로 간주되지 않으며, 트레이딩뷰에서 제공하거나 보증하는 것이 아닙니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참조하세요.
면책사항
해당 정보와 게시물은 금융, 투자, 트레이딩 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권장 사항으로 간주되지 않으며, 트레이딩뷰에서 제공하거나 보증하는 것이 아닙니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참조하세요.