OPEN-SOURCE SCRIPT

Fix Webhook Latency & DH-905 Errors (PineScript to Python Bridge

272
If you are routing TradingView alerts directly to an Indian broker API (like Dhan or Zerodha) and experiencing execution delays or DH-905 lot size rejections, the flaw is in your routing architecture.

The Problem: Dynamic vs. Static Data
PineScript generates dynamic data. A moving average crossover fires a signal based on a dynamic {{close}} price. However, broker APIs require static Exchange Tokens and rigid SEM_LOT_SIZE multipliers (e.g., Nifty = 65).

If you try to pass quantity: 1 directly to the Dhan API, or if your hardcoded exchange token moves out of the ATM range overnight, the exchange rejects the payload. Furthermore, standard third-party webhook routing adds 1 to 2 seconds of latency, destroying your entry price on fast breakouts.

The Middleware Solution
The PineScript above is Step 1. It formats a clean JSON payload containing the dynamic variables.

Step 2 is interception. You must not send this JSON to the broker. You must send it to a localized Python Flask server hosted on a headless Ubuntu VPS.

On startup, your Python server downloads the NSE Scrip Master directly into a Pandas DataFrame stored in RAM. When this PineScript webhook hits your VPS, the Pandas logic instantly snaps the dynamic {{close}} price to the nearest ATM strike, extracts the exact static Exchange Token, and routes the order to the API.

By removing the third-party webhook bottleneck and relying on RAM-cached token lookups, execution time drops to sub-50ms.

The Open-Source Architecture
I engineered this complete routing logic to eliminate my own Nifty options slippage. I have open-sourced the underlying Python Flask and Pandas routing logic so you can build out the middleware yourself.

Check the GitHub repository for the full Python architecture: github.com/codetradesalgo-cmyk/dhan-api-tradingview-webhook-python

면책사항

해당 정보와 게시물은 금융, 투자, 트레이딩 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권장 사항으로 간주되지 않으며, 트레이딩뷰에서 제공하거나 보증하는 것이 아닙니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참조하세요.