OPEN-SOURCE SCRIPT
QuantLine Geometric Conflict Lite V2
QuantLine Geometric Conflict Lite asks one question: where is BTC inside its own range —
and where are the alts inside theirs?
If BTC sits near the TOP of its range while most alts sit near the BOTTOM of theirs,
"long the alt off support" setups can look valid but often rest on borrowed strength —
BTC simply has not rolled over yet.
How it is calculated:
For each asset, position inside its own range on a chosen timeframe (default 4H):
pos = (last - range_low) / (range_high - range_low)
• 0 = at support (floor) · 1 = at resistance (ceiling) · 0.5 = mid-range
Headline metric — gap in percentage points:
conflict = (btc_pos - median(alt_pos)) * 100
Verdict (default ±30 pp — user-adjustable hypothesis, not a validated signal):
• ≥ +threshold → CONFLICT: BTC near ceiling, alts near floor. Handle alt support longs
with care.
• ≤ -threshold → INVERSE: mirror — BTC low, alts high.
• between → AGREEMENT: same part of their ranges — no contradiction.
Details:
• Degenerate ranges dropped if width < min % of price (default 0.5%).
• "Alts at floor N/M" counts basket members with pos ≤ 0.33.
• Basket is a fixed set of major crypto pairs, editable in settings. Keep it crypto —
session-gapped stock tickers distort a 24/7 breadth read.
Why this is not just a mashup of unrelated plots:
It measures one breadth relationship (BTC range position vs median alt range position)
and turns it into a single readable gap + verdict. Teaching lens for "whose strength is
this move standing on?" — not an entry system.
No entries, stops, or targets. No liquidation/OI/on-chain data. Not financial advice.
and where are the alts inside theirs?
If BTC sits near the TOP of its range while most alts sit near the BOTTOM of theirs,
"long the alt off support" setups can look valid but often rest on borrowed strength —
BTC simply has not rolled over yet.
How it is calculated:
For each asset, position inside its own range on a chosen timeframe (default 4H):
pos = (last - range_low) / (range_high - range_low)
• 0 = at support (floor) · 1 = at resistance (ceiling) · 0.5 = mid-range
Headline metric — gap in percentage points:
conflict = (btc_pos - median(alt_pos)) * 100
Verdict (default ±30 pp — user-adjustable hypothesis, not a validated signal):
• ≥ +threshold → CONFLICT: BTC near ceiling, alts near floor. Handle alt support longs
with care.
• ≤ -threshold → INVERSE: mirror — BTC low, alts high.
• between → AGREEMENT: same part of their ranges — no contradiction.
Details:
• Degenerate ranges dropped if width < min % of price (default 0.5%).
• "Alts at floor N/M" counts basket members with pos ≤ 0.33.
• Basket is a fixed set of major crypto pairs, editable in settings. Keep it crypto —
session-gapped stock tickers distort a 24/7 breadth read.
Why this is not just a mashup of unrelated plots:
It measures one breadth relationship (BTC range position vs median alt range position)
and turns it into a single readable gap + verdict. Teaching lens for "whose strength is
this move standing on?" — not an entry system.
No entries, stops, or targets. No liquidation/OI/on-chain data. Not financial advice.
開源腳本
秉持TradingView一貫精神，這個腳本的創作者將其設為開源，以便交易者檢視並驗證其功能。向作者致敬！您可以免費使用此腳本，但請注意，重新發佈代碼需遵守我們的社群規範。
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並非旨在提供，也不構成TradingView提供或認可的任何形式的財務、投資、交易或其他類型的建議或推薦。請閱讀使用條款以了解更多資訊。
開源腳本
秉持TradingView一貫精神，這個腳本的創作者將其設為開源，以便交易者檢視並驗證其功能。向作者致敬！您可以免費使用此腳本，但請注意，重新發佈代碼需遵守我們的社群規範。
免責聲明
這些資訊和出版物並非旨在提供，也不構成TradingView提供或認可的任何形式的財務、投資、交易或其他類型的建議或推薦。請閱讀使用條款以了解更多資訊。