Manual or Algorithmic? Most Serious Traders Do BothThe debate resurfaces every few months: manual trading vs algorithmic trading. Pick a side, defend it, repeat.
It's the wrong framing. This isn't ideology. It's trade-offs and most experienced traders you'd actually want to learn from operate somewhere in the middle.
"Manual" trading isn't fully manual
A common hybrid approach: use macro context and discretion to set your directional bias, then let predefined technical rules handle execution. The system waits for the pullback. Entries and exits follow rules you set in advance.
Judgment for context. Code for repetition. The line between manual and algorithmic is rarely as clean as the debate suggests.
Why traders move toward automation
The shift is rarely philosophical, it's about capacity.
Managing a handful of instruments by hand is manageable. Managing a portfolio across multiple pairs, strategies, and volatility regimes is a different job entirely.
Automation doesn't fix a weak edge. It removes your own bandwidth as the bottleneck. Once scale becomes the goal, structure stops being optional.
Backtesting gives you context, not certainty
A backtest doesn't predict the future. Markets shift, conditions change. What it does give you is a reference point: when a drawdown hits, you can check whether it falls within your strategy's normal range or whether something has actually broken.
Watch for over-optimisation. A perfectly smooth backtest usually means you've curve-fit to noise, not found an edge. You want robustness, not a flawless curve.
The part nobody talks about: emotional cost
Some strategies aren't just statistically risky, they're exhausting to run. Slow, grinding drawdowns create sustained pressure, even when the numbers are still fine on paper. The urge to exit at the worst possible moment isn't a lack of discipline. It's loss aversion under prolonged stress, and it's well documented.
For a lot of traders, automation isn't about squeezing out more return. It's about removing the chance to sabotage a good strategy at exactly the wrong moment.
Risk at the portfolio level
Trade multiple instruments and correlations creep up quietly; exposure to the same underlying theme can stack into one oversized bet without you noticing.
Simple rules handle this well: cap exposure per currency, scale size to volatility. Algorithmic execution enforces these without hesitation, before pressure enters the picture. Consistency in risk management usually beats precision on entries.
The "set and forget" myth
Automated systems don't run themselves. Regimes shift, volatility compresses and expands, liquidity changes, broker conditions change, infrastructure fails.
Automation removes emotional execution errors. It doesn't remove the need for oversight. The difference with a systematic approach is that adjustments are deliberate, planned in advance — not reactive, made mid-panic.
Where manual trading still wins
Algorithms struggle with anything qualitative: political shifts, central bank tone, structural macro change. Cutting exposure around a high-uncertainty event despite a system signal isn't inconsistency; it's context layered on top of structure. That's how a lot of professional trading actually works.
Coding is no longer the barrier
Learning to code used to be a career decision. It isn't anymore. Basic Python is enough to turn a vague belief into a testable rule, and testing years of history against an idea changes how you think about it. It exposes weak assumptions fast, even if you never automate a single trade.
So, manual or algorithmic?
Neither wins outright. Manual gives you flexibility and context. Algorithmic gives you consistency and scale. Most experienced traders end up blending both: discretion for context, rules for execution and risk.
The better question isn't "which camp are you in." It's: what structure lets you make the same disciplined decision, over and over, without burning out or sabotaging yourself?
Start there. Consistency beats identity, every time.
What's your split between discretion and rules and where do you draw the line?
Education