S&P 500 at Potential Reversal Zone—Is a Bigger Correction Next?The S&P 500 ( FOREXCOM:SPX500 ) reacted strongly to the recent support zone($7,463-$7,430) and Support Lines, which led to another bullish move. However, the index is currently trading near the key trading level of $7,500 and the Potential Reversal Zone (PRZ) .
From an Elliott Wave perspective, Wave C appears to have been completed through an Ending Diagonal pattern. The lower trendline of this pattern has already been broken, and the S&P 500 is currently pulling back to retest it.
I expect the S&P 500 to break below the support zone($7,463-$7,430) and support lines in the coming sessions and decline at least toward the $7,413 level.
Target: $7,413
Stop Loss(SL): $7,548
Note: Since tensions in the Middle East continue to escalate, any related news could have an immediate impact on the S&P 500. Therefore, be sure to monitor geopolitical developments closely and manage your risk carefully.
Note: If the S&P 500 begins to decline with strong bearish momentum, it could have a rapid and direct impact on the cryptocurrency market, especially Bitcoin ( BINANCE:BTCUSDT ).
What’s your view on the S&P 500? Do you think it can print new all-time highs again, or should we expect a deeper correction?
💡 Please respect each other's opinions and express agreement or disagreement politely.
📌 S&P 500 Index Analyze (SPX500USD), 4-hour time frame.
🛑 Always set a Stop Loss(SL) for every position you open.
✅ This is just my idea; I’d love to see your thoughts too!
🔥 If you find it helpful, please BOOST this post and share it with your friends. 
Short
Impulse, Diagonal, or a Larger Correction?Crude Oil (USOIL)Crude Oil (USOIL) – 4H Elliott Wave Update
Impulse, Diagonal, or a Larger Correction?
The recent decline may have completed either Wave II of a developing bullish cycle or Wave b within a larger corrective structure. At this stage, both interpretations remain valid, and the market has not yet provided enough structural evidence to confirm either scenario.
If the bullish count is correct, the next advance could unfold in more than one form.
The most straightforward scenario is a classic five-wave Impulse. However, Elliott Wave Principle also allows another possibility that deserves careful attention: Wave III itself may develop as a Diagonal.
Depending on how the structure evolves, this diagonal could appear as:
A Leading Diagonal, particularly if it marks the beginning of a larger fifth wave.
An Ending Diagonal if the market gradually loses momentum.
An Extended Ending Diagonal.
A Contracting Ending Diagonal, which currently appears to be the more probable diagonal variation.
In each of these diagonal structures, the internal subdivision would follow the familiar 3-3-3-3-3 sequence rather than the traditional impulsive subdivision.
On the other hand, if geopolitical conditions, supply disruptions, or market psychology suddenly intensify, the advance may instead develop into a powerful classic Impulse, producing a much stronger acceleration than a diagonal would normally suggest.
The projected path shown on this chart represents only a schematic illustration of a possible bullish sequence. It should not be interpreted as the exact path price must follow. As the structure develops, each wave may become more complex and subdivide into additional internal degrees.
For now, the primary objective is much simpler.
The market should first reach the initial target zone and successfully break above the previous Wave B, currently labeled as Wave III on this count. Only after that structural confirmation will higher Fibonacci objectives become increasingly reliable.
Alternative Corrective Interpretation
Another possibility is that the correction is not developing as a Zigzag at all.
Instead, it may be forming a Flat Correction—possibly even an Expanded Flat.
One reason this scenario deserves consideration is that Wave A retraced nearly 90%, behavior that remains consistent with several Flat variations. Although the structure currently appears somewhat irregular, Elliott Wave guidelines recognize that Flats can often develop with a relatively "messy" internal appearance.
If this interpretation proves correct, the equality relationships between corrective waves may become more reliable than extended Fibonacci projections during the early stages of the new advance. Until the market clearly reveals the character of the next motive structure, these proportional relationships deserve close attention.
The Conservative Scenario Remains on the Table
Despite the increasing probability of a bullish reversal, the conservative scenario shared in my previous long-term analysis remains completely valid.
Under that interpretation, the entire decline may still represent only Wave (II) of a larger degree, unfolding as a Classic Zigzag before the next long-term bullish cycle begins.
For those interested in the broader context, I encourage reviewing my previous long-term Crude Oil analysis, where this conservative roadmap is discussed in greater detail.
Final Thoughts
At this stage, the objective is not to predict the exact path of the market.
It is to recognize the structures that remain valid, identify the levels that confirm or invalidate each scenario, and allow price action to reveal the true character of the developing trend.
Sometimes the market advances through a clean Impulse.
Sometimes it progresses through a slow and overlapping Diagonal.
The difference is not only in price—it is in the character of the wave.
Patterns whisper. I listen.
— Mr. Nobody 
Long
Reading the Character of the Next Market CycleCrude Oil: Impulse or Diagonal? Reading the Character of the Next Market Cycle
In my previous long-term analysis, the primary expectation was that crude oil was developing the final fifth wave of the largest degree as a classic Impulse. If that interpretation proves correct, the long-term bullish outlook remains valid and significantly higher price objectives could still become achievable over the coming years.
However, as the market structure continues to evolve, another equally valid Elliott Wave scenario deserves serious consideration.
Rather than unfolding as a traditional impulse, the final advance may develop as a Diagonal. At this stage, the structure could take the form of an Ending Diagonal, an Extended Diagonal, or—most likely—a Contracting Diagonal (wedge).
If this scenario unfolds, the long-term bullish outlook remains intact. The difference lies not in the direction of the trend, but in its character. Instead of a fast, decisive advance, price may continue to climb through an overlapping, grinding, and increasingly exhausting structure—behavior that is typical of terminal diagonals.
At the same time, the conservative scenario remains fully valid.
Under this interpretation, the decline from the previous major high represents only Wave A of a larger corrective structure. The following rally retraced more than 90% of that decline and reached approximately 11,555.4, a behavior that remains consistent with several corrective formations.
As a result, the current decline could be developing as an impulsive Wave C of a Classic Zigzag (A-B-C). Alternatively, it may become part of a larger Double Zigzag correction.
Another possibility that should not be overlooked is the development of a Flat correction—either a Regular Flat or an Expanded Flat. In such a case, Wave C could itself unfold as an Expanding Ending Diagonal. Although less common, this structure is fully consistent with Elliott Wave guidelines and is often characterized by increasing volatility, broadening price swings, and persistent overlap between waves.
At this stage, no single scenario has been confirmed. The evolution of price structure—and respect for key invalidation levels—will ultimately determine which path the market chooses.
Beyond Price: Studying the Character of Waves
Over the years, my research has gradually moved beyond simply counting waves or projecting price targets.
One question continues to capture my attention:
Can market structure reveal not only where price may go, but also the character of the environment in which future market cycles will unfold?
This is why I spend as much time studying the character of waves as I do their labels.
Many traders assume that every impulse must resemble the textbook ideal. My observations suggest otherwise. Every market has its own personality. Some trends unfold with exceptional strength and clarity, while others advance through prolonged overlap, hesitation, and exhaustion.
Perhaps these differences are not random.
Financial markets do not exist in isolation. They constantly interact with one another. Sometimes they move together through positive correlation. Sometimes they move in opposite directions. At other times, these relationships strengthen, weaken, or even reverse as global economic conditions evolve.
Understanding these relationships is far more complex than identifying a wave count, and I believe there is still much to discover.
In the case of crude oil, for example, a prolonged period of geopolitical tension, recurring disruptions to strategic energy routes, political conflicts, or a sustained war of attrition could create market conditions that are more consistent with the personality of an Ending Diagonal than with a clean, explosive impulse.
Conversely, an abrupt and severe supply shock could produce the kind of powerful momentum more commonly associated with a classic Impulse.
This is not an attempt to predict geopolitical events.
Rather, it is an attempt to understand whether market structure may reflect changes in collective psychology before those changes become fully visible through headlines and economic data.
This remains an ongoing personal research project rather than a definitive conclusion. My objective is not simply to forecast price, but to better understand the relationship between wave structure, crowd psychology, intermarket behavior, and the broader forces shaping future market cycles.
Perhaps markets do more than anticipate price.
Perhaps they also whisper something about the future itself.
Patterns whisper. I listen.
— Mr. Nobody
CFDs on Brent Crude Oil
Jun 6
Crude Oil: The Long-Term Elliott Wave Projection
CFDs on Crude Oil (WTI)
7 days ago
US Oil (WTI) – 4H Elliott Wave Update
Long 
TSLA: A Structural Blueprint of the Grand Cycle
"Price is the consequence. Structure is the cause."
This analysis is not a simple price forecast. Rather, it is a structural study of Tesla's position within its Grand Cycle through the principles and guidelines of Elliott Wave Theory.
Since its 2010 low, Tesla has developed a sequence of impulsive and corrective waves, each forming part of a much larger market geometry. The objective of this study is to identify the market's current position within that hierarchy and explore the most probable paths ahead based on wave structure, Fibonacci relationships, and Elliott Wave principles.
Aggressive Scenario (Turquoise Path): A Developing Leading Diagonal
The primary interpretation assumes that Primary Wave (IV) has already completed and the market has begun constructing a Leading Diagonal, marking the first phase of a new higher-degree impulsive cycle.
Within Elliott Wave Theory, a Leading Diagonal typically emerges at the beginning of a new trend, when market sentiment remains uncertain and confidence has yet to fully return. Rather than signaling weakness, this structure often reflects the gradual transition from accumulation toward expansion.
The key question is therefore:
Has the current correction already fulfilled the structural requirements of a Leading Diagonal?
If the answer proves to be yes, Tesla may already have established the structural foundation for the next higher-degree advance, potentially leading into a powerful Primary Wave (III), which is often the strongest and most dynamic phase of an impulsive sequence.
Conservative Scenario (Blue Path): The Correction May Require Further Development
The conservative interpretation remains equally bullish over the long term but suggests that the current correction may not yet be structurally complete.
Under this scenario, the market could still require a more mature corrective formation, such as:
Zigzag
Flat
or a more complex corrective combination
Once that correction is completed—while respecting Elliott Wave rules and structural guidelines—the market would still be expected to follow the same long-term bullish path illustrated by the aggressive scenario.
In other words, the destination remains the same. The only difference lies in the maturity, depth, and internal structure of the current correction.
Key Structural Levels
Structural Invalidation Level: 101.40
First Wave Territory: 19.73
The long-term objectives presented in this study are not arbitrary price projections. They are derived from Fibonacci expansion relationships and the mathematical structure of Elliott Wave development.
Research Note
Alongside the two primary scenarios, an alternative wave count remains under continuous evaluation.
Under this alternative interpretation, the current diagonal could ultimately prove to be an Ending Diagonal, completing Primary Wave (III) rather than initiating a new impulsive cycle. Should that interpretation prevail, the market would still require a larger-degree Primary Wave (IV) correction before the next long-term advance begins.
At present, however, the available structural evidence continues to favor the Leading Diagonal interpretation. The Ending Diagonal remains a secondary research hypothesis, maintained not because it is currently preferred, but because Elliott Wave analysis requires every credible structural alternative to remain open until the market itself resolves the pattern.
My objective is not to defend a preferred wave count, but to continuously refine structural understanding through the observation of real market behavior.
Markets are often dominated by noise.
Structure reveals the logic behind price.
Patterns whisper. I listen.
– Mr. Nobody 🎧📊
Elliott Wave Researcher 
Long
Long
GASOLINE Daily Elliott Wave UpdateGASOLINE topped out at 4.4232 on Mon 06 Jun 2022 and then started dropping.
The decline looks like a classic three-wave corrective zigzag, and wave © formed an ending diagonal.
The structure finished around the 1.6799 invalidation level — so, based on the data from the chart, both scenarios you’re watching are now invalidated.
Pay close attention: wave © broke out of the corrective channel.
In patterns where wave (A) is sharp (impulsive-like), wave © often ends up building an ending diagonal.
And here’s the interesting part: if the final wave is diagonal (whether it’s coming from an impulse-style path or a diagonal zigzag), price sometimes does the opposite and effectively reverses/cancels the whole ending diagonal structure.
Now I’ve got two ideas for the next move:
Blue aggressive idea:
If price breaks above the previous peak (your current “blue” level) and then forms any corrective pattern, while keeping respect for the move into First invalidation at 2.8490, then the bullish setup stays fully valid with strong confirmation.
Black conservative idea:
Alternatively, the final part of wave 5 of I might still be unfolding, and then we could be entering a fresh corrective phase.
If that happens, it can also match a bullish outlook for the gas oil market overall.
I’m “Mr. Nobody” — I listen to what the patterns say, and I’m sharing what the chart is telling us.
Long
Short
Tesla: Bullish Structure Still Intact After 30% PullbackTesla (TSLA) has experienced a sharp pullback of nearly 30% from recent highs, yet the internal structure of the decline does not currently appear impulsive. Instead, price action continues to resemble a corrective phase rather than the start of a sustained bearish trend.
The updated wave analysis points toward a potential seven-swing corrective structure, which is typical of complex consolidations within larger uptrends. This retracement is approaching the 50% to 61.8% Fibonacci zone measured from the April 2025 lows, an area that often acts as a high-probability support region in ongoing bullish cycles.
Price behavior around this zone is becoming increasingly important. Tesla has already shown signs of recovery, attempting to move out of a corrective channel, which suggests early confirmation that buyers are re-entering the market. This aligns with the idea that the “yellow box” support area is currently being respected.
From a broader perspective, there remains a possibility of another upward leg forming, potentially developing into wave C of wave five within an ending diagonal pattern visible on the weekly timeframe. This would still be consistent with a broader bullish structure, but would require confirmation through continued upside momentum.
However, risk remains on the downside. A decisive break below 260, especially if accompanied by accelerating selling pressure, would significantly weaken the bullish interpretation. In that scenario, it would suggest that the ending diagonal structure may already be complete, opening the door for a deeper correction toward 200, and in an extended bearish case, even toward 150.
Key Points:
-Current decline appears corrective rather than impulsive (likely a seven-swing structure)
-Price is reacting around the 50%–61.8% Fibonacci retracement zone
-Recovery from support suggests early bullish response within the correction
-Break above 390 would confirm continuation of the bullish rebound scenario
-Drop below 260 would shift bias bearish, targeting 200–150 range
Overall, Tesla is sitting in a critical decision zone where the next directional move could define whether this is a continuation of the broader uptrend or the beginning of a deeper corrective phase. Long 
XAUUSD 4H — Ending Diagonal Update: TP1 & TP2 Done, TP3 CloseFollow-up to the ending diagonal breakdown published four days ago.
The original thesis: rising wedge rejection at the 0.118 Fibonacci level, breakdown through wedge support, three structural targets mapped from the distribution.
The update:
TP1 at $4,725 — reached and now acting as resistance confirmed.
TP2 at $4,690 — reached. Structural support level did not hold.
Current price: $4,635. Below both targets, above TP3.
TP3 at $4,575 remains the macro retracement target. With TP2 now broken, that level becomes the next logical demand zone to watch for absorption.
The invalidation from the original publication stands: reclaim and close above $4,855 on the 4H. Nothing has changed structurally to revisit that level.
Structure called the move. The targets did the work.
No revision to the framework. The read is playing out. 
Short
Short 
XAUUSD 4H — Ending Diagonal at $4,880. RSI & OBV DivergenceGold has been telling the same story as BTC and ETH this week. Just on a different instrument.
Price pushed into the $4,880 liquidity level, printed an ending diagonal at the highs, and rejected. Three confluences were already visible before the reversal.
RSI bearish divergence. Price made a higher high into $4,880. RSI made a lower high. The momentum behind the move was not there. That divergence was the first warning.
OI declining on the final push. When price is reaching for new highs and open interest is contracting, the participation is not confirming the move. Operators were not adding to longs at $4,880. They were reducing them.
Ending diagonal structure. The final push into the liquidity level formed a classic ending diagonal — converging trendlines, diminishing momentum, the textbook signature of a move running out of fuel before reversal.
Three instruments. Three liquidity sweeps. Same 24-hour window. ETH at $2,480. BTC at $76,000. Gold at $4,880.
This is not coincidence. This is institutional order flow operating simultaneously across markets. The composite man does not break out. He collects first.
Current price is sitting at $4,786 after the rejection. The $4,880 level now acts as resistance. A reclaim of that level with conviction and OI expansion changes the picture. Without it, the path of least resistance is a deeper retracement before any continuation attempt.
Watch the OI. It will tell you whether the next push into $4,880 is real before price confirms it. Short 
Short 
Long
Short
Short
Short 
Long
Bitcoin at $70k: Tech selloff, AI fears & the $55k riskBitcoin has dropped to the critical $70,000 psychological support, revisiting this level for the first time since November 2024. Following a massive sell-off in global tech stocks driven by fears over inflated AI valuations, risk sentiment has soured, dragging BTC down as the dollar strengthens.
In this video, we analyse the technical damage and explore two Elliott Wave scenarios that suggest a bounce is imminent—but the long-term implications differ significantly.
Key topics covered :
The trigger : How the route in Alphabet, Qualcomm, and ARM Holdings sparked a risk-off environment, pushing BTC to test the 50% retracement of the entire 2022-2025 bull run.
The bullish structure (Flat pattern): We break down the potential "expanded flat" correction. If the current drop is a 5-wave impulse (Wave C), we may have just completed the structure. However, losing $70k opens the door to the 61.8% extension at $58k.
With the daily RSI at 20 (levels not seen since August 2023) and price hitting a 2-standard-deviation channel support, an oversold bounce is probable.
The bearish structure (Ending Diagonal) : A rejection at $80k–$100k could confirm an Ending Diagonal, signalling a much deeper correction towards $40k later this year.
Critical levels to watch :
Support : $70k is the line in the sand. Below that, we look at $64k and the "Golden Pocket" at $52k-$55k.
Resistance : A bounce needs to clear $80k (previous support) and $98k-$100k to confirm a bullish reversal.
Are we seeing a bottom at $70k, or is this just Wave A of a larger crash? Let us know in the comments!
This content is not directed to residents of the EU or UK. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. ThinkMarkets will not accept liability for any loss or damage including, without limitation, to any loss of profit which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. 
Long
