Get started
Assassin’s Creed Could Be Ubisoft’s Comeback Weapon Ubisoft is getting another chance to prove that its biggest franchises still have value Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced, a full remake of the 2013 pirate adventure, launched on July 9. The original title reached more than 34 million unique players, making it one of Ubisoft’s most successful releases The strategy is clear, follow the path of Capcom and bring back proven franchises through high quality remakes.. Remakes are attractive because they come with lower development risk, established audiences, and more predictable commercial outcomes. Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot has already confirmed that multiple Assassin’s Creed remakes are in development The timing is interesting because the market is valuing Ubisoft as if the company is heading toward a major crisis. Its enterprise value is around €1.2 billion, despite generating nearly €2 billion in average annual net bookings. Even a 3x valuation multiple would only bring Ubisoft closer to the level of struggling publisher Square Enix The current valuation suggests investors are pricing Ubisoft like a company slowly being dismantled rather than one facing temporary execution problems. Around 14% of Ubisoft shares on Euronext Paris are short, showing that many investors are still betting against a recovery So what is really happening inside Ubisoft? A New Structure and Fresh Capital In January, Ubisoft reorganized its business into five Creative Houses, moving away from its previous centralized structure. The most valuable assets ended up inside Vantage Studios, which controls major franchises including Assassin’s Creed, Far Cry, and Rainbow6 The remaining studios are focused on different parts of the portfolio, including multiplayer franchises like Ghost Recon and The Division, live service games such as The Crew, and family-oriented brands like Rayman Tencent invested €1.2 billion into Vantage Studios in November 2025, receiving a 26% economic stake while Ubisoft maintained control and continued consolidating the studio’s results. The investment valued Vantage Studios at a €3.8 billion enterprise value before the deal That valuation is important because it suggests Tencent sees more value in Ubisoft’s core franchises than the public market currently assigns to the entire company. However, Ubisoft’s ownership structure, the Guillemot family’s control, and Tencent’s right of first refusal make a full acquisition unlikely The investment also strengthened Ubisoft’s balance sheet. At the end of FY26, the company had €1.3 billion in cash and adjusted net debt of only €200 million, a major improvement from the financial pressure investors feared a year earlier However, the pressure has not disappeared. Ubisoft faces roughly €500 million in bond repayments in November, followed by another €700 million in late 2027. Those obligations could consume most of its current cash reserves before the upcoming game pipeline has time to generate meaningful free cash flow The company’s future depends heavily on refinancing and execution The Back Catalog Is Doing the Heavy Lifting Ubisoft’s older games are currently carrying the business In FY26, its back catalog generated €1.3 billion in net bookings, while new releases contributed only around €200 million. That means roughly 84% of Ubisoft’s revenue came from games released in previous years This highlights the strength of Ubisoft’s intellectual property. Assassin’s Creed, Rainbow Six, Far Cry, and other franchises continue generating revenue long after launch. The shift toward digital gaming also helps because there is no used-game market reducing the long-term value of older titles. The challenge is not whether Ubisoft has valuable franchises. The challenge is whether it can consistently create new hits A Recovery Depends on the Pipeline Ubisoft’s recent performance shows the problem: -FY24: Net bookings reached €2.3 billion, helped by Assassin’s Creed Mirage, The Crew Motorfest, and strong catalog sales -FY26: Net bookings dropped to €1.5 billion as the company lacked major new releases -FY27: Management expects another decline, with net bookings estimated around €1.4 billion Black Flag Resynced is the biggest release in the near term, but expectations are extremely low. That creates an opportunity. The game does not need to become a record breaking blockbuster to improve investor sentiment. A solid performance alone could remind the market that Ubisoft’s franchises still have value The timing could also help, with an Assassin’s Creed Netflix adaptation expected in the coming months potentially bringing more attention to the brand The bigger test comes later. Ubisoft expects FY28 and FY29 to bring a stronger lineup, including Assassin’s Creed Hexe, Far Cry 7, and a new Ghost Recon title. If those games perform well, bookings could move back toward the €2 billion range The biggest risk is delays! Ubisoft has a long history of postponements, and another wave of delays could create a serious cash flow problem The Cash Burn Problem Ubisoft’s biggest weakness remains free cash flow The company has reported negative free cash flow in four of the last five fiscal years, including: - FY24: approximately -€500 million - FY26: approximately -€400 million Management expects FY27 free cash flow usage to remain below €500 million, but that does not leave much room for mistakes The positive scenario is that Ubisoft expects cumulative free cash flow to turn positive between FY27 and FY29. That would significantly improve its financial position, but it depends entirely on the upcoming games actually launching and performing The company has already started reducing expenses. Fixed costs declined from €1.75 billion in FY23 to €1.44 billion in FY26, with a target of €1.25 billion by FY28. Ubisoft has also reduced its workforce from around 20,000 employees to roughly 16,000. The smaller cost base lowers the break even point, but it does not fix everything. Ubisoft still needs successful games to generate enough revenue Why Investors Should Pay Attention The market is pricing in a serious solvency risk Investors are not only worried about weak games. They are worried Ubisoft may need to raise capital if cash flow does not improve, which could lead to dilution. The catalog provides stability, but the company has little room for another major disappointment The upside could be significant if cash flow returns A valuation below 1x annual bookings only makes sense if investors believe Ubisoft’s franchises are losing value. However, the company’s back catalog has remained surprisingly strong, generating more than €1 billion annually. The bar for improvement is relatively low Tencent has already assigned value to Ubisoft’s best assets The Vantage Studios deal valued the company’s core franchises at €3.8 billion, far above Ubisoft’s current market valuation. That does not guarantee success, but it shows strategic buyers see long-term value. Ubisoft still has reputation problems The company has dealt with workplace controversies, game quality issues, delays, cancellations, and criticism over leadership structure. The Guillemot family maintaining tight control remains a point of debate among investors Ubisoft does not need a miracle. The company still owns some of gaming’s strongest franchises, its back catalog generates over €1 billion annually, and its cost structure is finally moving in the right direction But the next few years will decide everything. Ubisoft needs to successfully launch its upcoming games, stabilize free cash flow, and prove that its smaller organization can generate consistent profits. At around 0.6x average net bookings, the market is pricing Ubisoft as if the recovery will fail. After years of delays and disappointing launches, investors are not buying the story anymore.. They want proof For Ubisoft, the next major release is not just another game launch, It is a test of whether one of gaming’s biggest publishers can rebuild trust
EURONEXT:UBILong
by moonypto
UNILEVER Critical Crossroads and/or Nice Longterm Entrypoint! Unilever is currently trading at a highly significant technical level . Looking at the long-term historical price structure, the stock has pulled back into an area that has repeatedly acted as major support over the years. At the same time, price action continues to respect the ascending support trendline that has been in place since roughly 2002 ( at least based on the for me available chart history ). At the moment, price is hovering near the upper boundary of this long-term rising structure, attempting to maintain strength while waiting for renewed momentum to enter the market. From a bullish perspective, the key factor here is whether buyers can successfully defend the current zone. Ideally, we would want to see volume return alongside a strong continuation move higher. If momentum shifts back in favor of the bulls, a retest of the all-time high around €67.12 — reached on February 13, 2026 — could imply approximately 38% upside potential from current levels. That said, downside risk should not be ignored. There is a realistic possibility that price enters a broader consolidation range, illustrated by the green box on the chart ( with the questionmark in it ). Historically, a very similar ranging environment occurred between December 2014 and February 2017, during which the stock traded within a maximum fluctuation range of roughly 30%. If history were to rhyme, this could also suggest the potential for a deeper corrective move before a larger trend continuation develops. From a fundamental perspective, Unilever is in the middle of a major strategic transformation focused on simplifying and streamlining its operations. The company has already divested its ice cream division — including brands such as Magnum — and in March 2026 announced the merger of its food division with McCormick & Company. As a result, the “new” Unilever will become a more focused consumer goods company centered entirely around Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, and Home Care. Investor sentiment around this transition remains mixed. On one hand, underlying business performance remains relatively solid, with Q1 2026 underlying sales growth coming in at 3.8%, which demonstrates resilience on an organic basis. On the other hand, reported revenue in euro terms declined by 3.3% year-over-year versus Q1 2025, largely due to unfavorable currency effects. This creates a market environment where both bullish and bearish interpretations remain valid depending on whether investors prioritize operational growth or top-line contraction. Overall, the current price region appears attractive from a long-term investment perspective, especially considering the historical technical support and the company’s strategic repositioning. However, in the short term, traders should continue monitoring both price action and macro/fundamental developments closely, as volatility in either direction remains highly possible. Not financial advice. Trade safe <3 !
EURONEXT:UNA
by AV_Trade_Invest
3
Risk / Reward optimal levelUpcoming merger with Orascom Construction PLC caused unnecessary fear and uncertanity. During such mergers in 75% of cases there is 20% premium paid. Intrinsic value is higher than current value on the market. Analyts recommended prices: Average price target: Approximately €5.87 to €6.98. High-end forecast: Around €8.86 to €10.50. Low-end forecast: Around €4.30 to €4.36. So calculate intrinsic value yourself for example if its €6 then add 20% premium and Value after merger will be €7,2. In other words you will get so much in value in Orascom Construction PLC stocks.
EURONEXT:OCILong
by gatto_nero
Harmonic pattern says BUY AlstomFundamentals: The company had some issues after taking over Bombardier, and getting outdated equipment. They selling their products in 5-10 year contracts, so the price is fixed but costs rising all the time. Margin is in danger. They issued new shares in 2024 wich was also a bad sign. But. The european infrastructure needs new trains. They expanding to Kazahstan and Portugalia as manufacturing locations. Also won contracts in Egypt and India. I think the worst is over, inflation peaked. And if recession hits, those contracts will be gold mine because of long-term obligations and falling costs. Technicals. The april low is reached again. Fell 50% from recent top. Harmonic 'bat' says it's a buy. Target is the €28 level. Can fall lower? Yes, in 2023 it fell 60%, so €12 is also possible. Can fall further? In 2024 it went sidewasy for half a year before taking off +150%. Now it's only went sideways for 77 days. I will add on lower levels if it falls and wait for next earnings. This company only reports 2x a year. Let me know your opinion in the comments.
EURONEXT:ALOLong
by totifex
Delhaize: Trade OpportunityI bought Delhaize at € 34,75. Price made a double bullish divergence on the 1D chart between the price and the RSI, the divergence was made on a level with high support. When we look at the price on the 1W time frame, it is at the support on the Supertrend indicator. We're gonna "set a stop loss" on a 1W bearish flip on the Supertrend indicator at about € 34,57. Meaning that I'll look at the price every friday and see if the weekly Supertrend flipped bearish. Stop loss is <1% + 1% fees The risk I'm willing to take on this trade is € 500,00 So € 500,00 / 2% = € 25.000,00 trade value I locked in about 20% of the trade value at € 34,75. I will look to lock in more on a 1H and 4H Supertrend flip.
EURONEXT:ADLong
by Arreat
SBM Offshore -- Bullish reversalSBM Offshore is currently trading around an important historical price level near 31.60. This level has acted as a significant decision zone multiple times in the past, making it a key area to watch from a price action perspective. Earlier on the chart, price reacted strongly around the 31.60 area, where it faced resistance and got rejected. After that rejection, price moved lower and created a lower low. This showed that, at that time, sellers were still in control around this level. Later, price managed to recover from the lower zone and pushed above the 31.60 area, eventually creating a higher high. This was the first sign that buyers were gaining strength and that the previous resistance level was becoming less dominant. After that move, price returned once again to the 31.60 zone. At that moment, the level still acted as an important reaction area, and price moved lower again. However, from that lower point, buyers stepped in strongly and pushed price all the way to new highs. This showed that demand was still present and that the broader bullish structure had not completely failed. Now, price has returned to the 31.60 level once again. The important difference this time is that price appears to be holding this area as support instead of rejecting from it as resistance. The current bullish bounce from this level suggests that buyers are defending the zone. From a technical perspective, this could indicate a possible support/resistance flip, where a previous resistance level is now turning into support. If this level continues to hold, 31.60 could act as a potential base for a new upward move. The current reaction is bullish, but confirmation is still needed. A stronger bullish signal would come if price continues to hold above 31.60, forms a higher low, and then breaks above the recent lower highs. If that happens, a move back toward the previous highs becomes a more realistic bullish scenario. The main level to watch is therefore 31.60. As long as price remains above this level, the bullish scenario remains valid. However, if price loses 31.60 with strong candle closes below it, the bullish setup weakens. In that case, the level could turn back into resistance, and price may look for lower support zones.
EURONEXT:SBMOLong
by SilencerX
2
Akzo Nobel: Gap filled, watching reaction + merger noiseHad the 4H gap up after the move, but it got sold off fast and basically filled again. Now we’re back at that level, so it’s more a reaction zone again. Could be just a sweep before continuation up, or a failed breakout that leads lower. Also the Axalta merger got rejected, but it’s not fully off the table yet, so that story can still come back into play and move the stock again if anything changes. After the fast drop I wouldn’t be surprised if we get a bounce here, but need to see buyers actually step in. Watching: • reaction around the gap fill area • if buyers defend this zone • if we reclaim lost levels again • any new merger headlines (Axalta) Not in a rush, let it play out.
EURONEXT:AKZA
by A3R5
2
Ryanair ensures stability: Michael O'Leary as CEO until 2032 By Ion Jauregui – Analyst at ActivTrades Ryanair shares could see movement at the opening of the session after the company confirmed the renewal of Michael O'Leary as Chief Executive Officer until 2032, thereby extending the mandate of the executive who has led the airline for more than three decades. The decision removes uncertainty over the future direction of the group at a time when the company is consolidating its position as the largest European airline by number of passengers. Ryanair carried nearly 200 million passengers in its last fiscal year and recorded a net profit of more than 1.6 billion euros in 2025, supported by strong travel demand in Europe, despite a moderation in fares compared to post-pandemic levels. O'Leary, who has been at the head of the company since 1994, has been the main driver of the low-cost model that has defined Ryanair’s strategy, based on operational efficiency, high fleet utilisation, and route expansion in key European markets. Strategic visibility and growth targets The continuity of the executive comes in parallel with the airline’s plans to reach 300 million passengers annually by 2034, compared to current levels of around 200 million, supported by the incorporation of Boeing 737 MAX aircraft and the expansion of capacity at secondary European airports. The company also maintains a leading position in operational indicators, ranking among the most punctual airlines in Europe over the past year, with rates above 85% in various periods of the fiscal year. Market impact and valuation With a market capitalisation of around 25 billion euros, Ryanair has maintained a positive performance on the stock market in recent years, supported by the recovery in air traffic and improvements in operational efficiency. Investors will continue to closely monitor the evolution of demand during the summer season, as well as the group’s ability to execute its growth plan in an environment shaped by the delivery of new aircraft and the evolution of operating costs. Technical analysis From a technical perspective, Ryanair maintains a broader bullish structure, with a gradual recovery from May lows and the formation of higher highs and higher lows. The stock is trading around 25.82 euros, consolidating the recent rebound phase. The RSI at 59.22 reflects a positive bias without entering overbought territory, while the MACD maintains a bullish crossover with a positive histogram, confirming upward momentum. In terms of key levels, resistance is located between 27.60 and 28.32 euros, whose breakout would open the way towards previous highs. On the downside, immediate support is found around 25 euros, a key level to preserve the current structure. Moving averages show gradual improvement: the 50-day average has crossed above the 100-day average, although the price is still below the 200-day average, a key reference for confirming a fully established long-term trend. Conclusion The renewal of Michael O'Leary until 2032 strengthens Ryanair’s strategic visibility in an environment of expansion in European air traffic. For the market, the move consolidates the continuity of an operating model that has supported the group’s growth and profitability over the past decades. The market reaction will depend on whether investors interpret the news as an additional catalyst within an already established trend or as a confirmation factor of the existing strategy. ******************************************************************************************* The information provided does not constitute investment research. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and such should be considered a marketing communication. All information has been prepared by ActivTrades ("AT"). The information does not contain a record of AT's prices, or an offer of or solicitation for a transaction in any financial instrument. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Any material provided does not have regard to the specific investment objective and financial situation of any person who may receive it. Past performance and forecasting are not a synonym of a reliable indicator of future performance. AT provides an execution-only service. Consequently, any person acting on the information provided does so at their own risk. Political risk is unpredictable. Central bank actions can vary. Platform tools do not guarantee success.
EURONEXT:RYA
by ActivTrades
1
CAP GEMINI: A Tech Stock That Is Still InexpensiveWhen using TradingView’s stock screener and filtering for technology companies with a market capitalization above USD 100 billion, the resulting list is dominated by American and Asian companies, with very few European firms represented. Here is the link to the TradingView global stock screener: fr.tradingview.com In reality, there are only three European technology companies with a market capitalization exceeding USD 100 billion: ASML, ARM, and Infineon. Can investors still find European technology companies that remain attractively valued from a stock market perspective? I conducted the research, and the answer is yes. To do so, one must look at European technology companies with market capitalizations below USD 100 billion. Within this category, there are numerous high-quality European firms with very promising earnings prospects linked to artificial intelligence. To determine whether these companies represent attractive investment opportunities, I focused on two criteria: • Forward P/E, which relates the stock price to expected earnings • The medium- and long-term technical chart structure Several opportunities emerge from this analysis, but my preferred choice from both a technical and fundamental standpoint is Capgemini, listed on the Paris Stock Exchange. This French company has strong fundamental potential related to AI, and its valuation remains very reasonable based on its Forward P/E, trailing P/E, and Price-to-Sales ratios. The results of my research can be found in the table attached to this analysis. I encourage you to review it and examine the charts of these European technology stocks. The table below highlights European technology and AI companies whose valuations remain attractive and that may offer catch-up potential relative to the leading U.S. technology stocks. From a technical analysis perspective, the stock is currently trading at a major support level corresponding to the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement of the previous major bullish phase. The chart below displays Capgemini’s weekly Japanese candlesticks along with its trailing P/E and Price-to-Sales valuation ratios. DISCLAIMER: This content is intended for individuals who are familiar with financial markets and instruments and is for information purposes only. The presented idea (including market commentary, market data and observations) is not a work product of any research department of Swissquote or its affiliates. This material is intended to highlight market action and does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. If you are a retail investor or lack experience in trading complex financial products, it is advisable to seek professional advice from licensed advisor before making any financial decisions. This content is not intended to manipulate the market or encourage any specific financial behavior. Swissquote makes no representation or warranty as to the quality, completeness, accuracy, comprehensiveness or non-infringement of such content. The views expressed are those of the consultant and are provided for educational purposes only. Any information provided relating to a product or market should not be construed as recommending an investment strategy or transaction. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Swissquote and its employees and representatives shall in no event be held liable for any damages or losses arising directly or indirectly from decisions made on the basis of this content. The use of any third-party brands or trademarks is for information only and does not imply endorsement by Swissquote, or that the trademark owner has authorised Swissquote to promote its products or services. Swissquote is the marketing brand for the activities of Swissquote Bank Ltd (Switzerland) regulated by FINMA, Swissquote Capital Markets Limited regulated by CySEC (Cyprus), Swissquote Bank Europe SA (Luxembourg) regulated by the CSSF, Swissquote Ltd (UK) regulated by the FCA, Swissquote Financial Services (Malta) Ltd regulated by the Malta Financial Services Authority, Swissquote MEA Ltd. (UAE) regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority, Swissquote Pte Ltd (Singapore) regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Swissquote Asia Limited (Hong Kong) licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and Swissquote South Africa (Pty) Ltd supervised by the FSCA. Products and services of Swissquote are only intended for those permitted to receive them under local law. All investments carry a degree of risk. The risk of loss in trading or holding financial instruments can be substantial. The value of financial instruments, including but not limited to stocks, bonds, cryptocurrencies, and other assets, can fluctuate both upwards and downwards. There is a significant risk of financial loss when buying, selling, holding, staking, or investing in these instruments. SQBE makes no recommendations regarding any specific investment, transaction, or the use of any particular investment strategy. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. The vast majority of retail client accounts suffer capital losses when trading in CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. Digital Assets are unregulated in most countries and consumer protection rules may not apply. As highly volatile speculative investments, Digital Assets are not suitable for investors without a high-risk tolerance. Make sure you understand each Digital Asset before you trade. Cryptocurrencies are not considered legal tender in some jurisdictions and are subject to regulatory uncertainties. The use of Internet-based systems can involve high risks, including, but not limited to, fraud, cyber-attacks, network and communication failures, as well as identity theft and phishing attacks related to crypto-assets.
EURONEXT:CAP
by Swissquote
1
Longed ALLDLLonged ALLDL. Not desirable as its under monthly support but I am going to take punt here. Entry, Stop Loss and Exit all there. Its a monthly chart so patience is key. Will take a while to play out. Patience is always rewarded. Worth a punt! Will update in due time. Manage your risk! #DYOR Disclaimer: I might fill my order early or sell early then the desired target. It all depends what I see and when I am on my desk. Entry, SL & Exits are all for educational purposes. Where ever possible I do update what I have done with my trade.
EURONEXT:ALLDLLong
by Thund3rBolt
Ahold Delhaize – A Long-Term Recovery Setup, Not A Momentum TradAhold Delhaize is a very different setup compared with the stronger momentum names in my universe. This is not currently a high-speed breakout model, but more of a long-term recovery and revaluation case. The stock has been under pressure for a longer period, and that means the strategy must be much more patient and confirmation-based. My model focuses on whether Ahold can stabilise, build a reliable base and reclaim important resistance zones. A cheap-looking stock is not enough. The chart must show that sellers are losing control and that the market is willing to price the company higher again. Fibonacci levels help me define the major zones where recovery can either fail or start to accelerate. For options, this means I prefer longer-dated contracts rather than short-term speculation. Ahold needs time. The ideal option strategy is based on controlled exposure, enough duration and a clear technical trigger. Until the stock confirms a stronger recovery structure, I treat it as a patient value-and-recovery setup rather than an aggressive momentum trade.
EURONEXT:AD
by CSE_Option_Decision_OS
ASRNL – Defensive Quality With Quiet Trend StrengthASR is not the loudest stock in the market, but it is one of the more interesting defensive quality names in my Dutch universe. The strength of ASR lies in its relatively stable trend behaviour, its defensive business profile and the way the stock can move steadily through Fibonacci zones without the extreme volatility of high-beta growth names. My model for ASR is based on patience. This is not a stock where I expect explosive overnight moves. Instead, I look for controlled continuation, support around important retracement levels and gradual expansion into higher price zones. That makes ASR suitable for longer-dated option strategies, where time works in favour of the broader trend rather than against short-term noise. The options strategy is focused on long calls with enough time to allow the trend to develop. I do not want to overtrade ASR. I want to own the structure when the price action confirms strength and only reconsider when the stock loses important higher timeframe support. ASR remains a quiet but serious core swing candidate.
EURONEXT:ASRNL
by CSE_Option_Decision_OS
ING – Financial Momentum With Fibonacci StructureING remains an interesting financial stock because it often moves in a technically readable way through important support, resistance and Fibonacci zones. It is not the same type of explosive growth stock as the US technology names, but that is exactly what makes it valuable inside a balanced options universe. ING can offer relatively clean swing structures with controlled option risk when the entry is timed well. My model focuses on trend continuation, higher lows and reclaim of key price zones. As long as the stock keeps respecting its broader uptrend and finds support after corrections, the bullish structure remains relevant. I use Fibonacci mainly to identify where buyers may step back in and where the next resistance zones could appear. For options, I prefer a disciplined call strategy instead of chasing every move. The ideal setup is a pullback into support, a reclaim after weakness or a confirmed breakout from consolidation. ING remains a core financial name in my model because it combines liquidity, trend structure and option tradability.
EURONEXT:INGA
by CSE_Option_Decision_OS
HEIJM – A Dutch Fibonacci Compounder Still Worth TrackingHeijmans remains one of the most important reference models in my Dutch stock universe. This stock has shown how powerful a long-term revaluation can become when fundamentals, market psychology and Fibonacci structure start to align. The move in recent years was not just a random rally, but a classic example of trend expansion through multiple Fibonacci zones. My current model is focused on the larger swing structure: higher lows, support around important retracement levels and the ability to keep building strength after previous resistance zones have been reclaimed. For an options strategy, HEIJM is not a short-term momentum gamble for me. It is a continuation swing model where time, patience and structural confirmation matter more than intraday noise. The strategy remains simple: respect the trend as long as the higher timeframe structure remains intact. I only become defensive if the stock starts losing major support zones and the Fibonacci structure breaks down. Until then, HEIJM remains a strong Dutch benchmark case in my model.
EURONEXT:HEIJM
by CSE_Option_Decision_OS