ETF market
The SPX confirmed the break down, but the QQQ hasn't yet!In this video I cover with my subscribers the SPX chart we have been studying and per our rules the SPX finally confirmed the break down but what's interesting is that the QQQ's have not yet confirmed the break down of the wedge pattern. Does it confirm tomorrow or these upcoming days? That is what I'm currently watching our for. There is evidence that the QQQ's may have one more move up based on other charts we have been looking at such as NVDA that has an inverse head and shoulders, mind you it has not triggered yet but the pattern is there and could be giving us bread crumbs of just one more move up before the next leg lower and have a bigger correction soon in the markets. A lot of semis have been beaten down and have not yet hade a big enough bounce and are also showing signs of one more bounce for then to petter out and go lower.
If you liked the video and are interested for more content like this consider subscribing for trade Ideas and I also go over trades that I take on and study. leave a comment and boost, what are your thoughts?
Time cycle theory on SPY by CUBE CosmosI've mapped time-cycle verticals across every major turning point since 2017. The intervals are consistent. Each crash was preceded by a "false bull" phase where price accelerated above the median line, sentiment peaked, and late buyers committed at the worst possible moment.
What I'm seeing now:
Price is pressing against the upper channel boundary at ~738. Brent crude just broke $100, 10Y yield at 4.70%, negative gamma regime confirmed, mega-cap earnings disappointing. The market has entered the same compression zone that preceded the 2020 and 2022 crash boxes.
The thesis:
The time cycle projects one more euphoric push higher before the next crash box activates. This is the distribution phase. The rally from here is not opportunity, it's the final rotation from smart money to retail. When the next vertical hits, the geometry repeats.
Invalidation: Sustained breakout above the upper cyan channel on expanding volume and breadth. If that holds for 3+ weekly closes, the cycle has broken.
This is Part 1. Follow for the crash box geometry and projected levels in Part 2.
TLT LongDemand Zone confirmation
Entry 83.2
no Stop
Target 87
Risk management is much more important than a good entry point.
I am not a PRO trader. About 25% of my trades had been stopped quickly.
TLT BFF (buy for Free)
SellToOpen 2027-01-15 P81, 1.73 (Delta=-0.31)
BuyToOpen 2027-01-15 Call spread C83/88, 1.63 (C83 Delta=0.67)
Allow assignment to accumulate Conservative long term investment.
if P81 could be assigned, same as limit buy at 81.
No stop, buy and hold.
QQQ: Diamond formation in play; 8% move down next?The QQQ might just have confirms the diamond formation which is sending major warning signals :
QQQ recently broke below the diamond formation towards 693$ , went back up to retest 708$ and now is back down. This is sending a signal : confirmation of the diamond pattern and a potential move lower.
Looking at possible targets by taking the high of the diamond pattern to the low , this takes us to the 636$ , an 8% move down. This level happens to coincide with the 50% and 618% of the entire move that happened since late march.
Is this the start of the big AI bubble burst or is this just a minor retracement before reaching new highs?
Let me know what you guys think below
Hope you liked today’s analysis , make sure to follow for more.
$SPY & $SPX — Levels and Scenarios for Friday, July 24, 2026🔮 AMEX:SPY & SPCFD:SPX — Levels and Scenarios for Friday, July 24, 2026
📊 Key U.S. Economic Data (ET)
9:45 AM | Flash Manufacturing PMI | Forecast: 54.4 | Previous: 53.9
9:45 AM | Flash Services PMI | Forecast: 51.3 | Previous: 51.2
10:00 AM | New Home Sales | Forecast: 609K | Previous: 580K
⚠️ For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
📌 #FlashPMI #NewHomeSales
The Breakout That Couldn’t CloseA Simple Five-Point Framework for Studying Failed Breakouts
Not every move above resistance becomes a successful breakout.
Sometimes, price trades above an important level during the session but fails to hold it and closes back below. This may indicate that buyers were unable to maintain control.
However, one failed candle is not enough. We need a consistent method to separate meaningful rejection from ordinary market noise.
𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗙𝗬𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗨𝗣
First, mark the highest price reached during the previous 20 completed daily candles.
A failed-breakout candidate appears when:
• Today’s high moves above the previous 20-day high.
• Today’s close finishes back below that level.
Do not include the current candle when calculating the previous 20-day high. Always wait for the daily candle to close before evaluating the setup.
𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗜𝗩𝗘-𝗣𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗧 𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗖𝗞
Give the setup one point for each condition.
𝟭. 𝗪𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝗖𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
The candle closes in the lower half of its daily range. This suggests that sellers gained control before the session ended.
𝟮. 𝗟𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗨𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗪𝗶𝗰𝗸
The upper wick is at least one-third of the candle’s total range. It shows that price reached higher levels but could not remain there.
𝟯. 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗵 𝗩𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗲
The day’s volume is at least 1.5 times the average volume of the previous 20 sessions.
Higher volume makes the rejection more meaningful because more market participation was involved.
𝟰. 𝗪𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗦𝗣𝗬
The stock’s 20-day return is lower than SPY’s return over the same period.
A stock already underperforming the broader market may have less support behind its breakout attempt.
𝟱. 𝗪𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗘𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁
SPY is trading below its 50-day moving average.
A failed breakout may carry more weight when the overall market environment is weak.
𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗢 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗘
🔴 0–1 points: Weak evidence. It may simply be market noise.
🟡 2–3 points: Mixed evidence. Wait for more information.
🟢 4–5 points: Strong rejection candidate. Observe the next completed daily candle.
The score is not a prediction or an automatic trade signal. Its purpose is to organize the available evidence consistently.
𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗟𝗬𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞 𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪
1. Open the stock’s chart.
2. Select the 1D timeframe and Candles chart type.
3. Add the Volume indicator.
4. Add a 50-period Simple Moving Average.
5. Add SPY through “Compare or Add Symbol.”
6. Examine the previous 20 completed daily candles.
7. Mark their highest high with a horizontal line.
8. Wait for the current daily candle to close.
9. Check the five conditions and record the score.
𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗟𝗔𝗕𝗘𝗟𝗦
🔵 Blue line: Previous 20-day high
🔴 Red marker: Failed-breakout candidate
⚠️ Yellow marker: Unresolved outcome
✅ Green marker: Confirmed outcome
𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗦 𝗢𝗡 𝗗𝗔𝗬 𝟭?
🔴 𝗥𝗘𝗝𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗠𝗘𝗗
The rejection is confirmed when Day 1:
• Fails to close back above the breakout level.
• Closes below the low of the failed-breakout candle.
Both conditions should be satisfied before classifying the setup as a confirmed rejection.
🟢 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗗
The breakout is reclaimed when Day 1:
• Closes back above the breakout level.
• Closes in the upper half of its daily range.
A reclaim should be recorded as a separate setup instead of being treated as a confirmed failed breakout.
⚠️ 𝗨𝗡𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗗
If neither classification is satisfied, mark the setup as unresolved.
Do not force every chart into a bullish or bearish conclusion. Sometimes the correct decision is to wait for more information.
𝗧𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗙𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗕𝗔𝗥 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗬
Before drawing conclusions, test the framework on historical data.
1. Open TradingView’s Bar Replay.
2. Select an earlier date.
3. Move forward one daily candle at a time.
4. Keep future candles hidden.
5. Record the Day 0 score.
6. Record the Day 1 classification.
7. Measure the return after one, three and five sessions.
8. Repeat the process for at least 50 historical examples.
𝗦𝗜𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗗 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗧
Date: May 10
Symbol: XYZ
Five-Point Score: 4
Day 1 Result: Rejection Confirmed
Day 3 Return: −2.1%
Day 5 Return: −3.4%
𝗔𝗩𝗢𝗜𝗗 𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗕𝗜𝗔𝗦
Do not select only famous or obvious failed breakouts.
Use a fixed list of stocks and a fixed historical period. Record every setup that meets the original definition, including weak and unresolved examples.
The framework becomes interesting only if high-scoring setups produce consistently different results from low-scoring setups.
𝗙𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗟 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗖𝗘𝗦𝗦
Mark the level → Wait for the close → Calculate the score → Classify Day 1 → Record the results
A useful market framework should not depend on one attractive chart. It should use clear definitions, repeatable rules and enough historical observations to show whether the idea deserves further research.
𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗥
This material is provided for educational and research purposes only. It is not financial advice or a guaranteed trading strategy. Test the framework with Bar Replay or paper trading before considering any real-money decision.
SPY Without The Crash Box: Where We Should Be Today
SPY Without The Crash Box: Where We Should Be Today
Today SPY sits at $740. Without the crash box, we'd be at $2,988. That's not a fantasy projection. It's the natural compounding trajectory of a market that was never interrupted by collective panic. The belief channel, drawn from proven historical growth, puts our ceiling nearly 4x higher than where we actually are.
I can't even fit where we should be on this screen. Let that sink in.
The math of fear:
Every crash box created a debt spiral that took longer to recover from than the bubble took to form. The 2008 crash wiped 57% in 18 months. The recovery took 5.5 years just to get back to zero. That's not a correction, that's a generation of compounding deleted. Then COVID did it again. Each time, the market clawed back eventually, because growth is inevitable. But it clawed back to where it already should have been years earlier, not to where it would have been without the interruption.
The purple fan on this chart shows the compounding divergence. The longer we allow crash boxes to form, the wider the gap gets. It's exponential. We're not falling slightly behind. We're falling catastrophically behind.
What this actually cost:
Look at the wedge list. Economic Waste. Brutal Interest. Hello Benefits Goodbye Jobs. Kiss Retirement Goodbye. Can't Pay the Bills. Struggling Business. Every one of those wedges is a real consequence lived by real people because the market chose fear over investigation.
I'll make this personal. I'm a Chartered construction professional (MCIOB) with innovative solutions to complex problems, including energy infrastructure ideas that would have had me collaborating with people like Elon Musk by now. Instead, my construction business collapsed because fear-driven interest rate policy made it impossible for local authorities to pay SME contractors on time. I'm now fighting insolvency courts and chasing redundancy payments instead of building the future. My ideas didn't fail. The economy failed my ideas.
I should be innovating. Instead I'm fighting for justice because this system doesn't support good businesses in the SME sector. It punishes them for existing during a crash box.
This actually makes me sad and angry. Not for myself. For all of us. For every business that closed, every retirement that evaporated, every innovation that got shelved, every person who was told "the market conditions aren't right" when the only thing that wasn't right was our collective psychology.
$2,988. That's where we'd be today if we'd chosen belief over fear. Standards over panic. Investigation over contempt. Governance over chaos.
We're $2,248 per share behind where we should be. Multiply that across every pension fund, every retirement account, every small investor who was told the market always recovers. It does recover. But it recovers to where it should have been a decade ago, never to where it should be now.
The economy will grow because it must. Our survival in a growing population demands it. The only question is whether we keep paying the price for fear or whether we finally break the cycle.
I dare us to sort this.
QQQ just back inside multi-year channel but still not healthyThe blue channel lines illustrate a multi-year range where QQQ typically resides. When the trend breaks below it then bullish times follow, if above then bearish. It has been above it since May 8th with erratic movements around the top channel line. The 15 July failure to break back out of the channel is a long term positive but is quite painful for shareholders in the short term. Trend is confirmed downward after 1st week of July lower highs and lower lows. I propose that the QQQ could continue moving downward until it hits either the bottom of the channel or the 150 SMA (the orange line). I think approx. $665 in the second week of August for a start to a bounce up (geopolitical events aside).
Bearish for next few weeks to one month. If below $665 then $640 is bounce up target.
Bullish after 3rd week of august.
SPY BULLS WILL DOMINATE THE MARKET|LONG
SPY SIGNAL
Trade Direction: long
Entry Level: 743.21
Target Level: 749.08
Stop Loss: 739.28
RISK PROFILE
Risk level: medium
Suggested risk: 1%
Timeframe: 1h
Disclosure: I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis.
✅LIKE AND COMMENT MY IDEAS✅
Breakdown Risk in Consumer Discretionary ETF?The SPDR Select Sector Consumer Discretionary ETF has been rangebound as the broader market rallied, and some traders may see risk of a breakdown.
The first pattern on today’s chart is the apparent rounded top between September and May. The lack of breakout in price contrasts with the broader S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100. Does that demonstrate a lack of relative strength?
Second, January’s peak was only slightly above the December 2024 high. The result could be viewed as a false breakout.
Third, the 50- and 200-day simple moving averages are essentially on top of each other. That may reflect uncertainty about the longer-term trend, with potential to resolve in a bearish manner.
Finally, traders could eye the March low of $105.19 as initial support.
Standardized Performances for the ETF mentioned above:
SPDR Select Sector Consumer Discretionary ETF (XLY)
1-year: +7.92%
5-years: +31.36%
10-year: +200.49%
(As of June 30, 2026)
Exchange Traded Funds ("ETFs") are subject to management fees and other expenses. Before making investment decisions, investors should carefully read information found in the prospectus or summary prospectus, if available, including investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Click here to find the prospectus.
TradeStation has, for decades, advanced the trading industry, providing access to stocks, options and futures. If you're born to trade, we could be for you. Learn more here about TradingView’s Broker of the Year!
Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is no guarantee of future performance or success. There is a possibility that you may sustain a loss equal to or greater than your entire investment regardless of which asset class you trade (equities, options or futures); therefore, you should not invest or risk money that you cannot afford to lose. Online trading is not suitable for all investors. View the document titled Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options at www.TradeStation.com . Before trading any asset class, customers must read the relevant risk disclosure statements on www.TradeStation.com . System access and trade placement and execution may be delayed or fail due to market volatility and volume, quote delays, system and software errors, Internet traffic, outages and other factors.
Securities and futures trading is offered to self-directed customers by TradeStation Securities, Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and a futures commission merchant licensed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission). TradeStation Securities is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the National Futures Association, and a number of exchanges.
TradeStation Securities, Inc. and TradeStation Technologies, Inc. are each wholly owned subsidiaries of TradeStation Group, Inc., both operating, and providing products and services, under the TradeStation brand and trademark. When applying for, or purchasing, accounts, subscriptions, products and services, it is important that you know which company you will be dealing with. Visit www.TradeStation.com for further important information explaining what this means.
SPY Interval Delta-Hedged Iron Condor (Update)This is a continuation of an iron condor post where I'm basically delta hedging at intervals additively, subtractively, or via rolling. (See Post Below).
An additive delta hedge adds a spread to reduce net delta in one direction or the other. If the net position is skewing short, a short put spread is added; long, a short call spread.
A subtractive delta hedge takes profit on a spread to reduce delta in the position. If the net position is skewing short, I look to close a short call spread (assuming it can be done for 50% max) or greater; long, I look to close a short put spread (again, assuming it can be done at 50% max or greater).
I can also do an adjustment "non-additively" by just rolling in the untested side toward current price if I don't want to add units and the DTE is of sufficient duration. I generally don't roll in a side unless there are greater than 28 DTE left, particularly in this market, which has been somewhat whippy.
I also look at whether I can profitably mix and match put spread with call spread to reduce units, looking to close out for around a 1.40 ($140) profit, since the vast majority of the double double iron condors I put on that are ten wide on the put side with the short put leg at the 25 delta and the 2 x 5 wide with the short call leg at the -13 delta pay in the neighborhood of 2.80 ($280) per contract.
Generally, I only want to look at doing adjustments once a week, and only want to consider doing one additively if the net delta of the position is >+/- 5 delta, since a 45 DTE 10-wide spread on the put side with the short leg at the 25 delta only gives you about that amount, as does a 2 x 5 wide on the call side, with the short call legs camped out at the -13.
Currently, the net position is kind of spaghetti-works of spreads in the July 31st, August 7th, and August 21st contracts with 23.70 total credits collected on a capital requirement of 50.00, and a delta/theta of -13.23/28.80.
If I get time, I'll post all the individual spreads that are currently in the hopper ... .
Opening: EWY August 21st 130/140/215/225 Iron Condor... for a 3.25 credit.
Comments: High IVR/high IV at 85.5/81.
Metrics:
Max Profit: 3.25 ($325)
Max Loss/Buying Power Effect: 6.75 ($675)
ROC at Max: 48.1%
ROC at 50% Max: 24.1%
Will generally look to roll in untested side on side test, take profit at 50% max.
Short on XLF🚨 BANKS AT A KILLER ATH: Opening a Short on XLF Before the Middle East Sets Markets on Fire! 🚨
The US financial sector is experiencing absolute euphoria, breaking one all-time high after another. While retail traders are recklessly buying the tops, assuming banks will grow to the sky, we see an extremely stretched rubber band that is threatening to snap. Combined with the escalating tensions in the Middle East, a perfect storm is forming. We are not waiting for a washout—we are meeting it head-on with a surgically precise short.
📉 Overheated Market Hits a Geopolitical Wall
The XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund), which bundles banking giants, has had a textbook run. Over the past three months, it has surged by a massive +8.7%, breaking out to a new all-time high (ATH) in the $56–$56.9 range. By doing so, it has essentially hit the absolute ceiling of its 52-week range. Technically, the chart is extremely overextended and ripe for a correction.
But the main story is unfolding off the charts. The Middle East is in flames, and geopolitical risk is rising rapidly. Why are we shorting banks specifically? By its very nature, the financial sector is the most sensitive to macroeconomic shocks, interest rates, and global stability. The moment fear (risk-off sentiment) takes over the market, banking stocks will take the hit first, as big capital will immediately start fleeing to safety.
🎯 Our Trading Scenario and Key Levels
We are capitalizing on a clear price rejection at the ATH and opening a directional short position. The goal is clear—to ride the panic and technical profit-taking.
Action: Short XLF ETF
Trigger: Rejection from the ATH zone + Middle East escalation
Key Support to Watch: $55.00
Target Profit (TP): $54.00
💡 Impact on Investors and What to Expect Next:
In the coming hours and days, the market's reaction at the $55 level will be absolutely crucial. This is the first anchor point (support). If the market fails to hold it under the pressure of Middle East news, it will trigger an avalanche of stop-losses and profit-taking, which will carry us very quickly and smoothly right to our $54 target.
Don't try to catch a falling knife, and don't bet on endless growth when the rules of the game are changing. Managing risk to the downside is much more profitable right now. The position is loaded; we are monitoring the price action!
$SPY & $SPX — Levels and Scenarios for Thursday, July 23, 2026🔮 AMEX:SPY & SPCFD:SPX — Levels and Scenarios for Thursday, July 23, 2026
📊 Key U.S. Economic Data (ET)
8:30 AM | Unemployment Claims | Forecast: 211K | Previous: 208K
⚠️ For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
📌 #UnemploymentClaims #JoblessClaims
1-2 i-ii mini-me speaks for itself. Easy call on a 1-2 1-2 pattern here with nearly identical fractals to start a long and prosperous third wave of a bull cycle. Pot's bottomed, fundamentals/legislation line up, the only thing suppressing prices are lack of institutional money (soon to come as that is what will fuel the bull cycle) and the residual skepticism of ppl selling the rip. I was one of those... not any more.
Technical signs to look as we ascend. Long inverted wicks that result in higher closes in subsequent days will show news sellers getting punished. There's a saying in trading... you keep doing it until it stops working. When selling the rip starts making you regret your choices, weak hands turn into strong hands.
3X at this time next year would not surprise me.
*not financial advice*
Opening: QQQ Sept 4th 640/650/2 x 751/756 Iron Condor.. for a 3.21 credit.
Comments: High IVR. Weirdly, got filled for the exact same credit I got for the August 28th setup, albeit with slightly different strikes on the call side. 25 delta short put, 2 x -13 delta short calls.
Metrics:
Max Profit: 3.21 ($321)
Max Loss/Buying Power Effect: 6.79 ($679)
ROC at Max: 47.3%
ROC at 50% Max: 23.6%
Will generally look to take profit at 50% max.
AALG LONG — 1D ALMA Setup (WR 83% · avg RR 4.2)█ SETUP
NASDAQ:AALG · 1D · long only.
(Context: Leverage Shares 2x Long AAL Daily ETF — 200% daily exposure to American Airlines Group; path-dependent vs holding AAL outright.)
ALMA Averaging Strategy: ALMA 3 / σ2, SD band 2, min diff 1/1, 25% per bar, up to 4 adds, hard stop −10% from average entry.
Strategy Tester (AALG 1D):
Win rate 83% · profit factor 8.9 · max drawdown 9%
Avg winning trade +29.3% · avg losing trade −7.0%
Typical hold ~17×1D bars on winners — 2x airline mean-reversion grid on the daily Averaging template · 41-trade sample
═
█ WHY NOW
Fresh 1D ALMA long on the 21 Jul 13:30 UTC bar ~ $14.50 — first lot on this Averaging template (1 of 4).
Bar-close ENTRY after the mid-Jul wash under ~$16 — not a discretionary “buy American Airlines” call and not a leveraged day-trade. Hard stop −10% from fill ~ $13.05 . Exits follow Pine ALMA flip + min diff or the hard stop. Scale-in stays 25% per bar, up to 4 adds, if lower bars qualify.
═
█ MACRO
Sector: AALG = daily 2x AAL beta — US airline demand, unit revenue, fuel/cost gap vs peers, and leisure/corporate traffic drive the underlying more than broad index beta. Leverage and daily reset mean multi-day holds diverge from 2× spot AAL.
Tape (19–21 Jul): American Airlines CEO outlined a plan to close a >$3B profit gap (19 Jul), while peer airline headlines stayed on fuel costs and capacity fights (JetBlue/Spirit slots, Ryanair industry-shakeout talk). Execution is 1D ALMA Averaging on the fill bar — not an AAL earnings or CEO-vision forecast.
═
█ OUTLOOK
Positive factors
- Tester skew: 83% WR · PF 8.9 · avg win +29.3% vs avg loss −7.0% — fat right tail vs bounded ALMA stop path
- Fresh first-lot ENTRY on the 21 Jul daily close ~$14.50 after the mid-Jul slide from the mid-$15s — process re-arm, not revenge size
- ALMA — daily just flipped LONG at the band: 1D L:1 vs LAvg:4.3 — first bar above ALMA / SuperTrend pocket (~14.14–14.17) — touch-quality long, not a late chase deep above the band
- ALMA — slow clocks still stretched SHORT below: 3D S:4 vs SAvg:3.9 (OVERHEAT-S) · 1W S:3 vs SAvg:3.1 — structure clocks still below the band while the daily template arms — classic HTF discount fuel for an Averaging long
- EMA — weekly/3D still Below: 3D Cur S:4 · 1W Cur S:3 with weekly Dev still large in magnitude — slow EMA side not reclaimed; room for mean-revert if daily holds the flip
- SMC — 1D: FVG Enter Bull tagged ~ $14.17 on the 20 Jul daily bar — demand inefficiency sits just under the fill
Negative factors
- EMA — LTF already Above: 15m Cur L:6 · 1H Cur L:2 · 4H Cur L:3 · 1D Cur L:1 — young above-session on the execution clock; not a deep below-EMA discount entry
- SMC mixed at ~$14.17: same window also printed FVG New Bear — bull FVG is not a clean one-way shelf
- 2x daily leveraged ETF — overnight gaps and chop in AAL can erase a “correct” multi-day AAL view via compounding / path dependency even if the underlying drifts the right way
- First lot only (1 of 4) — no averaged cushion yet if the daily bar fails and lower adds qualify or the −10% path prints first
- Snapshot board had no VWAP Touch row for AALG — no Active Support/Resistance levels to lean on in this idea
Takeaway: the 1D ALMA strategy and strong tester skew support a disciplined first lot after the mid-Jul wash, with 3D/1W still below-band and a bull FVG near ~$14.17, but LTF OVERHEAT-L, a young daily above-session, mixed FVG, and 2x path risk frame a repair grind — not a clean trend reclaim; nominal risk stays on the −10% hard stop / Pine exit path.
Base case: follow 1D ALMA Averaging · hold/add on qualifying bars while the ~$14.1–14.5 bull-FVG / ALMA pocket cushions · mean-revert toward the mid-$15s prior shelf if AAL tape stabilizes without a fresh gap through the stop.
Bear case: lose the ~$14.17 bull FVG · 15m/1H giveback extends · AAL headline gap drives AALG through −10% toward ~$13.05 from this fill · template posts the stop and waits for the next bar-close arm.
Chart: NASDAQ:AALG 1D — ALMA Averaging Strategy.
Educational idea. Live position — past backtest ≠ future results. NFA.
Bubble Form Your Shell, The Paradox, Learn From Our Past & Elon Our Universe Expands Like a Bubble, Solidifying Mass Along the Way. Why Shouldn't a Financial Bubble Be Allowed to Do the Same?
Popping a bubble is interfering with someone's business plan. Of course it will fail after that. Then comes the "I told you so" paradox: a purely self-creating feedback loop that feeds fear, causes the very thing people predicted, and then provides false confirmation that validates the bias further. The prophecy doesn't prove itself. It creates itself.
This is why borrowing is so expensive. Because every idea has to survive a renewal cycle of reassessment as it travels an evolutionary path. The origin of any plan may not be as valid as the rethink. The pivot. The new direction. That's not failure, that's iteration. That's how every successful venture in human history has worked.
But instead of allowing that evolution, we fold. "This happened, therefore it's over." How about: we set out to do this, we found this instead, we reassessed, here's the new narrative. Don't mistake iteration for taking the piss. Dive into the mechanics. Examine the timeline. Map each trajectory. Adjust. That's what intelligent capital does.
Panic is the enemy. Not risk. Not even mistakes.
Bring enough wealth into the system to allow mistakes to be made, survived, and learned from. Sanction repeated identical failures if necessary. But do not penalise the evolutionary process itself. Do not pop the forming bubble just because it looks unfamiliar. Otherwise the initial investment, the original belief, the first deployment of capital, becomes nothing more than another entry in the Economic Death Wedge.
We lost a decade last time. Ten years of compounding, innovation, livelihoods, and progress. Because someone panicked. Because someone said "I told you so." Because we confused iteration with failure and pulled the plug on ourselves.
Never again.
The bubble is the mechanism. Let it solidify. Let it evolve. Let it do what the universe does: expand, create mass, and keep going.
I dare us to break the cycle.
Cube Cosmos
Research 24.07.2026🌏 Markets:
AMEX:SPY +2.54 0.34%(pre/m)
NASDAQ:QQQ +2.06 0.30%(pre/m)
🆕 Economic News:
THE US WILL IMPOSE NEW TARIFFS OF 10% TO 12.5% ON 60 COUNTRIES STARTING FRIDAY.
08:00 USA – Building Permits
10:00 USA – New Home Sales
📈 Gap Ups
Reaction to earnings/guidance:
NASDAQ:INTC NASDAQ:AMKR NYSE:THC NYSE:WKC NYSE:EW GPW:ASB XETR:SAP NYSE:SLB NYSE:DLR NYSE:NEM NYSE:CNI NYSE:SXT
Other news:
NASDAQ:NKTR on Start of Phase III Program on Rezpeg for Atopic Dermatitis
NASDAQ:ESLT Wins More Than $370 Million in CBP Contracts Through 2029
NYSE:ORCL wins $7 billion Pentagon software contract
NASDAQ:ADVB surging after the company terminated a purchase agreement giving it the right to issue and sell up to $25 million worth of stock to Helena Global Investment Opportunities I.
📉 Gap Downs
Reaction to earnings/guidance:
NASDAQ:MXL NASDAQ:SMMT NASDAQ:CHTR NYSE:HIG NYSE:DECK NYSE:AXP NYSE:NEE NYSE:VZ
Other news:
NASDAQ:ZVRA Provides Update on Regulatory Submission for Arimoclomol for the Treatment of Niemann-Pick Disease Type C (NPC) in the European Union
NASDAQ:RADX Announces Concurrent US$4.1 Million Registered Direct Offering
NASDAQ:WSE : US regulator rejects banking licence application
‼️ Additional
THE US WILL IMPOSE NEW TARIFFS OF 10% TO 12.5% ON 60 COUNTRIES STARTING FRIDAY.
-- The new measures are being justified as part of efforts to combat forced labor. A 10% tariff will be imposed on countries that have committed to adopting and enforcing a ban on imports of goods produced using forced labor. Other countries will face a 12.5% tariff.
-- The new tariffs will effectively replace the temporary global duties on US imports that took effect on February 24 for a period of 150 days.
-- In total, the measures will affect 99.4% of US imports and will apply to Washington’s largest trading partners — The Hill.
Trump: Xi Jinping is coming on September 24.
The Magnificent Seven stocks saw their sharpest one-day selloff since April 2025 yesterday.
-- Hedge funds and asset managers are actively selling US Big Tech stocks, while short positions in Nasdaq futures are rising rapidly, according to EPFR data.
🏢 IPO
NASDAQ:SCTX – Scribe Therapeutics, Inc.
Company develops CRISPR-based therapies for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Lead program, STX-1150, is designed to lower LDL cholesterol by targeting PCSK9 without permanently changing DNA. The company also has programs for elevated Lp(a) and severe triglycerides. Core thesis is one-time or long-lasting genetic medicine for major heart disease risk factors.
Price: $15.00
Shares: 8.6M
Raised: $128.7M
Concurrent Private Placement: $7.5M
Market Cap: ~$256.2M
LTM:
Revenue: $36.3M
Net Income: -$35.7M
Key point:
Lead program is in first-in-human Phase 1 trial, with initial data expected in H1 2027.
Comparable public companies: NASDAQ:CRSP , NASDAQ:NTLA , NASDAQ:BEAM , AQUISEU:VERV , NASDAQ:EDIT , NASDAQ:PRME
📋 List of tickers involved:
NASDAQ:INTC NASDAQ:AMKR NYSE:THC NYSE:WKC NYSE:EW GPW:ASB XETR:SAP NYSE:SLB NYSE:DLR NYSE:NEM NYSE:CNI NYSE:SXT NASDAQ:NKTR NASDAQ:ESLT NYSE:ORCL NASDAQ:ADVB NASDAQ:MXL NASDAQ:SMMT NASDAQ:CHTR NYSE:HIG NYSE:DECK NYSE:AXP NYSE:NEE NYSE:VZ NASDAQ:ZVRA NASDAQ:RADX NASDAQ:WSE NASDAQ:SCTX NASDAQ:CRSP NASDAQ:NTLA NASDAQ:BEAM AQUISEU:VERV NASDAQ:EDIT NASDAQ:PRME
Best regards – hi2morrow team.






















