Long
Long
Short
Long
Short
Short 
Long
Sandisk (SNDK) LONG — 1D ALMA Setup (WR 85%)█ SETUP
Sandisk · BATS:SNDK · 1D · long only.
ALMA Averaging Strategy: ALMA 3 / σ2, SD band 2, min diff 1/1, 25% per bar, up to 4 adds, hard stop −10% from average entry.
Strategy Tester (SNDK 1D):
Win rate 85% · profit factor 14.1 · max drawdown 38%
Typical hold ~17×1D bars on winners · high-payoff memory-name mean-reversion template
═
█ WHY NOW
Tuesday US cash close — fresh 1D ALMA long on 08 Jul 13:30 UTC ~ $1,618 .
First lot on the daily template after a sharp drawdown from the June highs — storage/memory beta on a bar-close signal, not an AI-headline chase. Snapshot ~ $1,657 on the 08 Jul board (~+2.4% from fill).
Hard stop zone −10% from entry ~ $1,456 . Exits follow Pine ALMA flip + min diff or the hard stop.
═
█ MACRO
Sector: SNDK = SanDisk · NAND flash / enterprise SSD · WDC spin-off (2025) — AI data-center storage and the NAND shortage thesis (Micron tight supply, multi-year LTAs with price floors), not GPU silicon.
Tape (Jun–8 Jul): Mixed supercycle → reset — June +~34% on Micron FQ3 blowout (25 Jun) and PT hikes (Citi $2,500, Bernstein $3,000, BofA $2,500, Goldman $2,200); early July sentiment reversal — Meta Compute oversupply scare (01–02 Jul, SNDK −~14%) and Samsung sell-the-news (06–07 Jul) erased most June gains (−31% from the June peak by 07 Jul). Analysts still cite ~$42B contracted backlog and LTAs — but late-window tape is profit-taking / glut narrative, not a fresh upgrade chase.
Near-term: SK Hynix (SKHY) Nasdaq listing (~10 Jul) — competition for US AI-memory flows; FQ4 earnings (~13 Aug, confirm IR) — NAND ASP / LTA guide.
Execution is 1D ALMA on the post-unwind bar (~$1,618 after the July flush), not an earnings preview or chase into June highs.
Book note: a separate 4H VWAP long from 02 Jul (~$1,759) remains underwater — this publish tracks only the fresh 1D ALMA lot.
═
█ OUTLOOK
Positive factors
- 85% WR · PF 14.1 — rare payoff skew on a 40-day US equity sample
- Fresh daily entry inside the 24h publish window — first bar on the high-WR template
- ALMA — daily stretch (fuel): 1D SHORT · S:5 vs SAvg 2.4 OVERHEAT-S — time below the daily band exceeds norm · MR fuel on the crash, not «SHORT = bearish»
- ALMA — execution ladder: 1H LONG · L:3 · 4H LONG · L:1 at the band — fast boards aligned with the new daily long · 15m S:1 first bar below fast ALMA (touch, not chase)
- EMA — overheated below (fuel): 1H Cur S:29 vs Avg S:6.7 · +4.5% dev — stretched below-session on the fast ladder after the July flush
- SMC — at the fill ~$1,618: 4H FVG Raid Bull bull-event bounce B 63.4% Br36.6% (n=71) · 1D raid B 68.4% Br31.6% (n=19) — close ≥ ref follow-through at the entry print · aligns with 1D ALMA long
- SMC — 4H: OB Enter Normal Bull @ ~$1,618 · bounce B55.6% Br44.4% (n=9) — bid-side structure at fill
- TL AI — Support Break 06 Jul: bounce B 81% Br19% (n=47) — elevated post-break bounce history on SNDK; supports the MR template despite the TL label
- Scoring: long +31.3 vs short −21.3 on the snapshot board
Negative factors
- EMA — young below (execution TF): 1D Cur S:4 vs Avg S:7.7 · +9.0% dev — below-session not yet overstretched on the daily chart; selloff can extend before the 1D ALMA band works
- EMA — overheated above (slow charts): 3D Cur L:78 vs Avg L:2.3 · −15.4% dev — long above-session on slow EMA after the June spike · giveback / coil risk even with price back near the line
- EMA — weekly crash context: 1W Above · L:23 · −51.2% dev — extreme unwind from the YTD memory rally; gap risk on headline opens
- ALMA — slow boards young: 3D/1W both SHORT · S:2 ≈ SAvg ~2.1 — higher-TF below-band time not stretched yet vs the overheated 1D read
- SMC — overhead ~$1,745 (02 Jul bull FVG): prior June shelf · bull-event bounce B 81.3% Br18.8% (n=16) — first test is a reaction zone, not a free pass; 06 Jul bear FVG formed/filled adds fresh supply into the same area
- Gap risk on memory-sector headlines — −10% stop can slip on the US open
Takeaway: the 85% WR daily template, 1D ALMA OVERHEAT-S, 1H below-EMA stretch, and SMC/TL bounce at ~$1,618 align with a post-crash MR entry — but 1D young below-EMA and 3D overheated above-time cap the first leg; exit path remains Pine / −10%, not a chase back to ~$1,745 without ALMA/EMA cooperation.
Base case: 1D ALMA holds ~$1,618–1,680 · 1H/4H long boards hold · slow grind toward prior supply ~$1,745 if memory sentiment stabilizes.
Bear case: lose daily ALMA · 1D young below extends · 4H liquidation flush · −10% toward ~$1,456 from ~$1,618 entry.
Chart: NASDAQ:SNDK 1D — ALMA Averaging Strategy.
Educational idea. Live position — past backtest ≠ future results. NFA. 
Long
USA Rare Earth (USAR) LONG — 12H ALMA Setup (WR 77%)█ SETUP
NASDAQ:USAR · 12H · long only.
(Context: USA Rare Earth — Round Top TX mine-to-magnet · NdFeB magnets · US critical-minerals chain.)
ALMA Averaging Strategy: ALMA 3 / σ2, SD band 2, min diff 1/1, 25% per bar, up to 4 adds, hard stop −10% from average entry.
Strategy Tester (USAR 12H):
Win rate 77% · profit factor 2.6 · max drawdown 22%
Avg winning trade +33.8% · avg losing trade −8.9%
Typical hold ~15×12H bars on winners — US small-cap mean-reversion grid on the rare-earth sleeve
█ WHY NOW
Wednesday US cash close — fresh 12H ALMA long on 09 Jul 13:30 UTC ~ $18.43 .
First lot on the template after a brutal June unwind (−23% on the month per tape) and a fresh regulatory headline week — bar-close on the 12H ALMA sleeve, not a CHIPS-deal chase into the spring highs.
Hard stop zone −10% from fill ~ $16.59 . Exits follow Pine ALMA flip + min diff or the hard stop.
═
█ MACRO
Sector: USAR = Western rare-earth / critical minerals — Round Top (TX) → Wheat Ridge hydromet demo → Blacksburg SC magnets (target 2028). Policy tailwind (Commerce agreements, US govt equity stake) vs execution and dilution risk on a pre-revenue buildout.
Tape (Jun–9 Jul): June −23% on share-overhang narrative, China export-control list (22 Jun), Russell benchmark exit (forced selling), and MP Materials trade-secrets lawsuit escalation. 6–7 Jul: Senate Democrats probe the ~$1.6B Commerce placement / Cantor Fitzgerald role — shares −7–8% on the inquiry. Offset in-window: Wheat Ridge hydromet demo commissioned 15 Jun with first separated oxides targeted Q3 2026.
Execution is 12H ALMA on the post-selloff bar (~$18.43), not a Q3 oxide-catalyst preview or policy headline chase.
═
█ OUTLOOK
Positive factors
- 77% WR · PF 2.6 on a 95-day 12H US equity sample — workable skew for a volatile small-cap template
- Post-crash MR frame: June −23% + early-July probe selloff leaves price ~$18–19 vs 52-week span $10.50–$43.98 — selloff context for a mean-reversion sleeve, not a breakout chase
- Wheat Ridge Q3 2026 oxide milestone (15 Jun commissioning) — one operational proof point in the window if execution stays on schedule
- US critical-minerals policy support (Commerce / CHIPS equity path) — sector beta for Western REE names even when tape is messy
- Hard −10% stop from ~$18.43 (~$16.59) caps nominal script risk on the first leg
Negative factors
- Regulatory / legal overhang: Warren-led probe (6 Jul) + China export-control symbolism (22 Jun) — headline gap risk on US opens
- Russell exit-driven selling and S-3 share-overhang narrative still in recent tape — float pressure can extend below the first ALMA add
- MP Materials lawsuit / IP narrative — distraction and competitive noise in US magnet supply chain
- Pre-revenue, capital-intensive buildout — commercial magnet scale and Round Top PFS (~end 2026) not yet in hand
- Sparse live factor board on USAR in the desk snapshot batch — no fresh EMA/ALMA/VWAP/SMC rows to confirm discount stretch at paste time; technical confirmation lags the equity headline read
- Single first lot — no averaged discount yet if the 12H bar extends lower before adds qualify
- Small-cap gap risk — −10% stop can slip on a policy headline open
Takeaway: the 77% WR 12H template and post-June selloff context support a disciplined MR long at ~$18.43, but regulatory probe noise, index exit selling, and missing fresh technical board data cap conviction — script-backed bounce sleeve vs headline overhang, not a clean rare-earth breakout; nominal risk stays on −10% / Pine exit.
Base case: 12H ALMA holds ~$17.50–19.50 · headline noise fades into range · slow grind if Wheat Ridge Q3 narrative stays intact.
Bear case: lose 12H ALMA · probe headlines accelerate · China-list symbolism triggers another flush · −10% toward ~$16.59 from ~$18.43 entry.
Chart: BATS:USAR 12H — ALMA Averaging Strategy.
Educational idea. Live position — past backtest ≠ future results. NFA. 
Long
Pre-Earnings Triangle in Tesla Tesla has been struggling all year, and now some traders may see risk of a break to the downside.
The first pattern on today’s chart is the tight range since July 2. The EV giant has made lower highs while remaining above roughly $390.50. That could be viewed as a bearish triangle, with potential for a move lower if support breaks.
Second, TSLA tried unsuccessfully to break its late-2024 high in December before making lower weekly highs. That may be consistent with a longer-term top.
Third, the 50-, 100- and 200-day simple moving averages are close to each other and essentially moving sideways. Could that long-term neutrality morph into bearishness?
Next, some chart watchers may see potential for prices to slide toward the 52-week low below $300.
Finally, TSLA is a highly active underlier in the options market. (Its average daily volume of 2.8 million contracts ranks second in the S&P 500, according to TradeStation data.) That could help traders take positions with calls and puts – especially with earnings due after the closing bell next Wednesday, July 22.
TradeStation has, for decades, advanced the trading industry, providing access to stocks, options and futures. If you're born to trade, we could be for you. Learn more here about TradingView’s Broker of the Year!
Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is no guarantee of future performance or success. There is a possibility that you may sustain a loss equal to or greater than your entire investment regardless of which asset class you trade (equities, options or futures); therefore, you should not invest or risk money that you cannot afford to lose. Online trading is not suitable for all investors. View the document titled Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options at www.TradeStation.com . Before trading any asset class, customers must read the relevant risk disclosure statements on www.TradeStation.com . System access and trade placement and execution may be delayed or fail due to market volatility and volume, quote delays, system and software errors, Internet traffic, outages and other factors.
Securities and futures trading is offered to self-directed customers by TradeStation Securities, Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and a futures commission merchant licensed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission). TradeStation Securities is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the National Futures Association, and a number of exchanges.
Options trading is not suitable for all investors. Your TradeStation Securities’ account application to trade options will be considered and approved or disapproved based on all relevant factors, including your trading experience. See www.TradeStation.com . Visit www.TradeStation.com for full details on the costs and fees associated with options.
Margin trading involves risks, and it is important that you fully understand those risks before trading on margin. The Margin Disclosure Statement outlines many of those risks, including that you can lose more funds than you deposit in your margin account; your brokerage firm can force the sale of securities in your account; your brokerage firm can sell your securities without contacting you; and you are not entitled to an extension of time on a margin call. Review the Margin Disclosure Statement at www.TradeStation.com .
TradeStation Securities, Inc. and TradeStation Technologies, Inc. are each wholly owned subsidiaries of TradeStation Group, Inc., both operating, and providing products and services, under the TradeStation brand and trademark. When applying for, or purchasing, accounts, subscriptions, products and services, it is important that you know which company you will be dealing with. Visit www.TradeStation.com for further important information explaining what this means. 
Long
Long
Long
Long
Long
Long
Long
AAPL Is Sitting on the Line — Waiting for the Room to AgreeAAPL is sitting right on top of my PD-15 high, and this is a key decision area for today.
The PD-15 range is based on the previous day’s final 15-minute candle. I use that high and low because it shows where price made its final stand before the session ended. It gives me a clean battle zone for the next trading day.
Today’s PD-15 levels:
PD-15 High: 328.30
PD-15 Low: 325.80
Right now, AAPL is above the PD-15 high, which means buyers still have a chance to control the move. But I’m not chasing just because price is above the range. I’m waiting for my ORB + Retest edge to confirm.
My process:
1. Let the first 15-minute Opening Range print.
2. Wait for a break with displacement.
3. Wait for a clean retest.
4. Look for a confirmation candle.
5. Confirm volume is behind the move.
Bullish Plan:
If AAPL holds above 328.30, breaks the Opening Range High, retests, and confirms with volume, I’ll watch for upside toward 333.30, then 335.80.
Bearish Plan:
If AAPL loses 328.30 and falls back into the PD-15 range, I’ll be cautious. The cleaner bearish setup comes if AAPL breaks below 325.80, retests, and confirms lower. Downside targets would be 320.80, then 318.30.
Key Levels:
- 328.30 = PD-15 High / buyer control level
- 325.80 = PD-15 Low / seller control level
- 333.30 = Call TP1
- 335.80 = Call TP2
- 320.80 = Put TP1
- 318.30 = Put TP2
For me, the trade is simple:
Above 328.30, buyers have control.
Inside the PD-15 range, I stay patient.
Below 325.80, sellers can take control.
I’m not predicting. I’m waiting for agreement.
YGO — Study the Levels. Wait for Agreement. Trade with Discipline.
Disclaimer: This idea is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. I’m sharing my chart breakdown, levels, and trade plan. Always do your own research and manage your own risk.
Long
PYPL: Stripe Bid $53B. Is $60.50 Enough?Six weeks after everyone wrote off its turnaround, PayPal just became the target in a $53 billion buyout bid — and jumped 17% in a single session because of it.
The bid on the table
Stripe and Advent International, with Block kicking in equity alongside them, offered $60.50 per share for PayPal — roughly $17 billion in equity backed by about $50 billion in committed bank financing. That's a real, financed offer, not a rumor. PYPL closed at 47.37 the day before the news leaked. It closed yesterday at 55.52, up 17.2%, which means the market is currently pricing this deal at roughly 80% odds of happening — a healthy premium already baked in, but still a real gap to the actual $60.50 offer.
The board hasn't said yes
PayPal's board hasn't accepted or rejected anything yet — they're expected to meet on this as soon as July 20. Until then, this stock trades on deal-probability math, not fundamentals. Michael Burry, who holds a PayPal stake, came out and called $60.50 too low, putting his own estimate of fair value between $75 and $115 a share, with $100 as his best guess. Whether or not you buy Burry's number, the point stands: the market isn't fully convinced $60.50 is where this ends, either.
The three prices that matter this week
MAKE-OR-BREAK 47.37 — the last price before the bid leaked. This is the floor if the deal collapses entirely and PayPal goes back to trading on its own turnaround story.
FIRST TEST 55.52 — yesterday's close, where the market currently has the deal priced at roughly an 80% chance of closing.
RECLAIM/TARGET 60.50 — the actual Stripe/Advent offer. Getting here means the market is pricing the deal as essentially done.
How this plays out
Deal confirmed or sweetened: a close above 55.52 that keeps climbing toward 60.50 says the market is growing more confident the board says yes — and if the offer gets raised (Burry isn't the only one who thinks $60.50 is light), the ceiling moves higher than 60.50 entirely.
Deal falls apart: a close back below 47.37 says the board rejected it, or talks broke down, and PayPal is back to trading as a standalone turnaround story with no acquisition premium.
Between 47.37 and 55.52 — no trade. That's the pocket where the deal is still alive but the board hasn't moved, and daily swings on nothing but rumor aren't worth chasing.
Invalidation
The bullish "deal happens" read dies below 47.37 — that's the price with zero acquisition premium in it. No shame in that; a stock two days into a buyout rumor hasn't earned a real range yet, and M&A situations can unwind on a single boardroom meeting.
The takeaway that isn't really about PayPal
This isn't a technical setup — it's a probability trade. The chart isn't telling you where PayPal "wants" to go next; it's telling you what odds the market has assigned to a board decision that hasn't happened yet. That's a different game than reading a breakout or a trendline, and it's worth knowing the difference: in an M&A situation, the stock price is a probability, not a forecast.
The board meets as soon as July 20. I will update this idea the moment there's real news — a formal response, a sweetened bid, or a walk-away. NVDA Poked A New High At 213.81, Then Faded.NVDA Poked A New High At 213.81, Then Faded.
Nvidia pushed through 212.55 to a new high at 213.81 overnight - yesterday's up-path - then faded back to 209.15, holding above the reclaimed 207.59 but well off the high. The daily conviction has tipped into EUPHORIA now, which is a caution flag and not a green light, and the old daily bear print is still standing uncleared. On the hour, conviction faded to bottom-quartile as price rolled over. Momentum poked the high and could not hold it. Neutral.
Resistance: 212.55-213.81 - yesterday's high and the new high
Key resistance: 215.00 - open air above
Current price: 209.15
Support: 207.59 - reclaimed, the line to hold
Key support: 204.82 - interior support
Structural floor: 202.20 - the base, breakdown invalidation
Two paths from here:
The dip holds 207.59 and the high gets retested. If NVDA defends 207.59 and pushes back through 213.81, the euphoria resolves into a real trend leg and open air opens above. The base and the reclaim are both still intact.
Euphoria caps it and it slips. A fresh high that fails, daily euphoria, and an uncleared bear print are the classic stall setup. A loss of 207.59 puts 204.82 and the base back in play, and the fade becomes a lower high.
NVDA got the new high and immediately gave it back. 207.59 holds the structure; 213.81 is the level it has to reclaim to prove the high was real and not just a euphoric poke.
Built with SYNTHESIS v3.3 | SOM / ACE / IMP / SYNTHESIS
Study, not financial advice. Week 24 of 52 SPCX The Most Important IPO of Our Generation?NASDAQ:SPCX is finally public, and the market is treating it exactly how you would expect: massive attention, huge volume, and immediate FOMO.
SpaceX is not just another IPO.
This is the company that turned reusable rockets from a crazy idea into one of the biggest technological advantages in the world. It built Starlink into the largest satellite internet network on the planet. It changed the economics of space launches. And now, it is finally trading in the public market.
That is why the hype is real.
SpaceX priced its IPO at $135 per share, raising a record $75 billion and reaching a valuation around $1.75 trillion. That makes this the largest IPO in history and immediately places SpaceX in the conversation with the biggest companies in the world.
The numbers are incredible.
In 2025, SpaceX reported approximately $18.67 billion in revenue, up 33% year over year. Starlink represented about 60% of total sales, supported by roughly 10.3 million users and around 9,600 satellites. That is not just a rocket company anymore. That is a launch business, a satellite internet business, a defense/space infrastructure business, and possibly one of the most ambitious AI/space platforms ever attempted.
But here is the part investors need to respect:
A historic company can still create a dangerous entry.
After pricing near $135, the stock quickly moved into the $150–$170 opening range. That first IPO move can be driven by scarcity, media attention, retail demand, institutional positioning, and the Elon Musk premium. That is where FOMO becomes powerful — and where bad entries are often created.
The first 1–2 months after a major IPO are usually not about “fair value.” They are about price discovery.
Early buyers take profits. Traders sell the first pop. Institutions reassess valuation. Underwriters may use the greenshoe option to stabilize trading. And retail investors who chased the excitement often get tested once the headline momentum cools down. SpaceX’s IPO also includes a greenshoe option that could allow underwriters to buy up to 15% additional shares at the IPO price, which is commonly used to help manage early trading volatility.
That is why my focus is not only on how incredible SpaceX is.
My focus is on where the market eventually builds a base.
SpaceX may become one of the most important public companies of the next decade. But even generational companies can go through a post-IPO cooling-off period before offering a cleaner long-term setup.
For me, the lesson is simple:
Do not confuse an incredible story with an automatic entry.
Do not chase maximum excitement.
Wait for structure.
Wait for price discovery.
Let the market show where real long-term demand is.
SpaceX may be historic.
But the smartest money usually does not buy the loudest moment.
Disclaimer: This idea is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Always do your own research and manage your risk. Week 27 of 52 ASTS Bounce From Support… Or Just Another TrapNASDAQ:ASTS SpaceMobile is back in one of the most important decision zones on the chart.
After a massive run, ASTS failed twice near the $125–130 area, creating a clear double-top structure. From there, sellers pushed the stock all the way back into the $60–65 support zone — and so far, buyers defended it.
That defense matters.
But here is the key: the easy bounce already happened. From the $60s to the mid-$80s, ASTS has already made a strong recovery. Now the stock needs confirmation.
Bullish scenario:
If ASTS can hold above $78–80 and reclaim $95–100 with strength, bulls may regain control. Above $100, the next upside zones would be $105–110, and eventually a possible retest of the old double-top area near $120–130.
Bearish scenario:
If the stock rejects around $90–100 and loses $72–70, the bounce starts to look weaker. A retest of $60–65 would become likely. If that major support breaks, the next downside zone could be $50–55.
ASTS is not a normal valuation story yet. This is a high-execution, high-risk, high-reward company. The satellite story is real, the partnerships are real, and the recent BlueBird launch keeps the narrative alive. But the company is still early-stage financially, with small revenue compared to its market value and large ongoing losses.
That means the stock can move violently in both directions.
For now, ASTS is not a blind chase for me.
It is a confirmation setup.
Bulls need to prove strength above $95–100.
Bears need a breakdown below $70.
Until then, this is a battleground between momentum and execution risk.
Key levels:
Support: $78–80 / $60–65
Breakout zone: $95–100
Upside targets: $105–110 / $120–130
Bearish breakdown target: $50–55
Disclaimer: Educational content only. This is not financial advice. Always manage risk and position size.
