Could IONQ Rally 181% Toward Wall Street’s $100 Target?IonQ has returned to a major historical demand zone near $35.48 after a sharp correction from its recent highs.
The technical picture is starting to become interesting:
Price is testing a long-term demand area
RSI has moved into oversold territory
The current sell-off may be approaching exhaustion
A bullish recovery would become more convincing if momentum begins to turn and price holds above support
From a fundamental perspective, IonQ remains one of the most important pure-play quantum computing companies.
The company continues expanding across:
Quantum computing
Quantum networking
Quantum security
Quantum sensing
Enterprise software
Recent growth figures also support the longer-term bullish case:
Q1 2026 revenue increased 755% year over year
Full-year revenue guidance was raised to $260–$270 million
Remaining performance obligations reached approximately $470 million
Trade Idea
📍 Entry: $35.48
🎯 Target 1: $48.50
Morgan Stanley
Potential upside: +36.7%
🎯 Target 2: $70.00
Northland Securities
Potential upside: +97.3%
🎯 Target 3: $100.00
Rosenblatt Securities
Potential upside: +181.8%
Bullish Scenario
A recovery in RSI, followed by an improvement in MACD momentum, could support a move back toward the first analyst target.
The strongest confirmation would come from price reclaiming the $40 area, which could open the way toward the higher targets.
Risk
IONQ remains a speculative and highly volatile growth stock. The company is still unprofitable, and the quantum-computing industry remains at an early stage of commercial development.
This setup is therefore better suited to investors who understand the higher level of risk and can tolerate significant volatility.
We are tracking this idea from $35.48 and will update the performance as the setup develops.
This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Analyst targets are estimates and are not guaranteed.
META Channel Down rejection targeting $485.Meta Platforms (META) has been trading within a Channel Down even since the August 11 2025 All Time High (ATH) and just last week it hit its Top (Lower Highs trend-line) and got rejected. This rejection can technically start the pattern's new Bearish Leg.
Trading already within its 1W MA50 (blue trend-line) and 1W MA100 (green trend-line), this price action displays a lot of technical similarities with the 2018 correction. That fractal also made a first Low on its 1W MA100 before rebounding to an ATH and then initiated the even stronger correction that marginally breached below the 1W MA200 (orange trend-line), completing a -43.77% total decline before rebounding.
Our main long-term Target for META remains $485, which is on Support 1 and by the time it hits, it will be below the 1W MA200 as in late 2018. If the drawdown extends as in 2018, we can see a max drop to complete a -43.77% decline at $450.
---
** Please LIKE 👍, FOLLOW ✅, SHARE 🙌 and COMMENT ✍ if you enjoy this idea! Also share your ideas and charts in the comments section below! This is best way to keep it relevant, support us, keep the content here free and allow the idea to reach as many people as possible. **
---
💸💸💸💸💸💸
👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇
IREN | DailyNASDAQ:IREN — Quan-Entangling Model
Quan-Analysis | Projecting an Impulsive Extension in Intermediate Wave (3) 📈
IREN rallied 27.55%, launching precisely from $ 32.22 ✨➤ identified as the extreme low of the Intermediate Wave (2) retracement, as projected.
Respecting the Entangled X Model of Quan-Structure χ 💫, whose Resistance Ray 1 and Support Ray 2 defined the broad origin of the illustrated Trend Ray with its Trend E-lines ➤ Δ, χ, and τ, impulsive expansions such as this session continue to be well projected.
Within the converging Quan-Structure ψ, all illustrated Trend E-lines contribute to shaping the Intermediate Wave (3) trend extension along its projected cymatic trendflow.
On the daily time frame, while the current model remains structurally well-integrated, Quan-Structure ψ continues to project the HPQ Target ➤ $133 🎯 | Early October .
📑 From my Quan-Analytical perspective, all identified Quan-Structures within a chart frame interact simultaneously to influence price behaviour—defining the direction of expansions, corrections, consolidations, structural forms, and their corresponding timelines. The degree of each expansion or formation is determined through the identified Quan-Structures illustrated on the higher time frame.
To better visualize this principle ➤ Quantum Entanglement within my methodology, I developed Model X. Like Quan-Structure χ in the daily frame below, it functions as a Transitional-Support Quan-Structure, encapsulating the combined influence of all identified Quan-Structures within a defined chart frame.
🔖 It's worth noting that every major turning point on the daily chart since early November has been identified with high precision through the defined Quan-Structures λᵣ, λ₁, λ₂, φ and now TSQ χ ⋆✨.⋆ in this Entangled Quan-Model ⋆˚࿔༄ ✰.⋆
#SmartInvesting #StrategicAnalysis #FutureVision #TrendAnalysis #MarketInfrastructure #QuanAnalysis #QuantumEntanglement
GOOGL: Chart is sitting on the fence,MACD is a calling reversal?The tech giant goes into earnings week laden with more doubts than its underlying fundamentals merit. Alphabet delivers results for the Q2 after Wednesday, July 22 close, with the street expecting revenues to be in the neighborhood of $116.91 billion which would mark a 21.2% growth YoY along with EPS of $2.90 that would mark a 24.2% growth YoY. Those are impressive numbers. Google Cloud posted revenues growing 63% YoY in Q1 to hit the milestone of $20 billion which was comfortably ahead of Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web services at that growth rate and consolidated revenue of $109.9 billion in Q1 comfortably beating forecasts. However, the stock is down 5.8% for the month despite the general gains in S&P 500. The European Commission is set to send a compliance order by July 27 demanding that Google disclose its anonymized search data to its competitors, which would effectively put a halt to the proprietary competitive advantage behind the 19% revenue growth of Google Search. The delay of Gemini 3.5 Pro has also raised questions regarding Alphabet’s ability to stay relevant compared to its rivals OpenAI and Meta in the ongoing generative AI race where the stock market is placing a premium on. Alphabet has invested $190 billion in AI technology since 2025,the question this Wednesday will be answered is whether such investment is starting to pay off, or simply increasing its costs without revenues.
In a sense, the chart is an exercise in uncertainty and that is indeed the right term for describing the behavior of a stock that is doing no wrong from a fundamental perspective but has been unable to muster up the strength to reach its May highs. In the message conveyed by the price action, it seems that since the June sell-off, Alphabet has found itself confined within a narrowing price range, with the moving averages tightening their grip on price both from above and below. Both the EMA 9 and the EMA 20 have become price barriers, which used to form the support trend during the stock's April rally but now hover slightly above the current price level. Meanwhile, the MA Cross, formed by the crossover between the 9 and 21 moving averages, lies just under this price range and forms a dense barrier of support, which has never been breached despite the weeks of trading in this range. This is the floor, while the ceiling is provided by the May highs at the $397 price level. Right now, the most honest indicator on the chart is the RSI, almost exactly below the neutral fifty line. It is that tight spread between the two, with RSI slightly above the signal line, which indicates that buyers have a very small edge over the sellers, although not enough for any kind of bullish bet in anticipation of a binary event. It is equilibrium rather than momentum. The MACD is the story which is slightly more upbeaTrade recomt underneath the calmness. The MACD line has just crossed the signal line, while the histogram has moved into the positive zone after weeks. It is the most fragile indication of a bullish crossover that we can get. Although it is not a very convincing signal, it is the only hint of optimism on the chart, which has been painting ambiguous pictures for the last six weeks, especially two days ahead of the catalyst in the form of earning news.
Trade recommendation
Direction : Cautiously long
Entry horizon : $340-$356
Primary target : $375
Secondary target : $397
Stop loss : Daily close below $318.84
Technical scenarios
Beat-and-raise with Cloud acceleration : If Alphabet crushes earnings with revenue above $116.91 billion and strong Cloud growth while clarifying the Gemini delay the stock could break out. Watch for the $375 resistance to fall, setting the stage for a push toward $397 and potentially $430.
In-line print, range continues : If results are just okay and questions about EU compliance and Gemini timelines remain, expect the stock to stay stuck. It will likely keep trading between the current support levels and the $375 ceiling. This is the most probable outcome if the report doesn't offer a major new catalyst.
EU ruling and Cloud deceleration disappointment : If an EU compliance order hits and Cloud growth slows below 55%, both bear cases align. The stock would likely break support at $318.84. Monitor this closely, as this is where the downside risk becomes real.
Ionq Holders - Quick Update With Neoclouds stepping up big over the last two sessions, the whole AI sector is catching a breath and one name I’m keeping a close eye on is IONQ. I’ve already dipped in with a small starter position.
Not gonna sugarcoat it: IONQ is a wild one. The last two major pullbacks were over 50%, so this is definitely not a ticker for anyone with a weak stomach. But that’s exactly why the risk/reward here feels irresistible to me.
My ideal setup:
I’d actually love to see this drift down toward the 200 EMA, which would mean roughly another 10% drop from current levels. That kind of retest would make the odds even better for a high‑probability bounce.
This isn’t a heavy allocation for me ... more of a strategic probe but I do want to see the $34 area hold this week. If it does, IONQ could easily bounce in sync with the rest of the beaten‑down AI names that are finally showing signs of life.
Have you already bought? :)
Ley
SpaceX - This stock is literally collapsing!🥊SpaceX ( NASDAQ:SPCX ) is heading for new lows:
🔎Analysis summary:
Just three days after the IPO in June, SpaceX already created its previous all time high. And over the past month, SpaceX then corrected about -50%, wiping out over $1 trillion. This chart remains totally bearish and is simply heading for new all time lows pretty soon.
📝Levels to watch:
$120
Keep your #LONGTERMVISION🙏
— Phil (@TheTraderPhil)
COIN GEX - Breakout Above 170, Potential Gamma SqueezeCOIN printed a double bottom on the daily chart, then reclaimed structure and cleared 170 – C1 / Ab1 . Spot is now near 180.50 , holding above the former Call Wall.
With 170 accepted, price has entered the positive gamma extension zone — gamma squeeze potential opens toward the 200 multi-metric cluster if momentum holds.
🔶 Regime Context 🔶
Price is trading well above HVL 155 , keeping COIN inside a positive GEX regime . The double bottom below, then the push back through HVL and into a C1 clear, frames this as a structural reclaim — not a random spike.
🔶 Options Structure Context 🔶
👉 170 – C1 + Ab1 — highest call wall + largest absolute gamma; cleared, now the breakout reference that must hold
Confluence at 170:
C1 — highest call NETGEX
Ab1 — largest absolute gamma
That makes 170 a clear reaction zone — clearing it is what can trigger a potential gamma squeeze .
👉 200 – nCV + COI + AbOI — next overhead magnet
Confluence at 200:
nCV — strongest net call volume
COI — highest call open interest
AbOI — highest absolute open interest
Together, 200 is a call-inventory and call-flow cluster — the natural squeeze target if extension holds.
🔶 Downside Structure 🔶
👉 170 – C1 / Ab1 — first line that must hold for the squeeze thesis
👉 155 – HVL — regime pivot; loss of HVL would weaken the positive-regime read
👉 140 – P1 — strongest put wall / downside floor
🔶 Options Sentiment 🔶
CALL$ 84.5% means call options at an equivalent distance from spot are priced 84.5% higher than the corresponding puts — this is elevated call pricing skew .
On the Options Oscillator, the filled green histogram remains elevated at the right edge — call pricing skew is still strong, not fading.
IVRank 77.2
IVx 86.2
CALL$ 84.5% — call pricing skew
Implied move ±6.27% (±11.3)
Price is also reclaiming the 50 SMA area, while the declining 200 SMA sits near the 200 confluence — technical overhead aligned with the options cluster.
🔶 Key Structure to Watch 🔶
170 — C1 + Ab1 cleared; must hold
200 — nCV + COI + AbOI squeeze magnet
155 — HVL / regime pivot
140 — P1 put wall
For now, COIN is a double-bottom reclaim + C1/Ab1 clear setup, with squeeze potential toward 200 .
The key question is whether price can hold above 170 and extend toward 200 — or whether the Call Wall rejects and sends the move back toward HVL 155 .
Devastating setupMarket leader in the AI agent sector, which I already described in the previous idea
+++++
Analysis
The price is approaching earnings (Wednesday) with a clear W-formation.
The key breakout for the start of the bullish move is a close above $110, accompanied by increasing volume.
Good earnings could push it higher as early as Wednesday, while a negative report will bring the price back to retest the blue support level.
Devastating target in the $150 area, and maybe even $170 to fill the GAP.
I'd say let's set our alerts properly to maximize the loot.
PYPL- PostCapitulation Base + Live $53B Buyout+ Burry + Congress
NASDAQ:PYPL is sitting at the intersection of a completed technical base, a live acquisition bid, and disclosed buying from some of the sharpest names in the market. Worth breaking down.
━━ THE CHART ━━
Monthly: PYPL round-tripped from its $310 ATH (2021) down toward $38. Everything from the top into early 2026 was bear-market grind — the slow bleed that precedes a real capitulation, not a base.
The actual base started in February 2026, when the stock flushed to $38-40 on a CEO change and a weak earnings print. That's the capitulation candle. Since then, price has repeatedly defended the $40 zone and built real structure.
Watching for a pullback into the $48-50 zone for an entry, with a stop below the swing low.
━━ THE ACQUISITION STORY ━━
Stripe + Advent International submitted a joint offer on July 15: $60.50/share, ~$53B deal, backed by $50B in committed financing. Stock jumped 16-17% on the news.
▸ PayPal's board reportedly views the bid as inadequate
▸ Prediction markets on deal completion: jumped from ~10% to 77% within days
▸ Independent activist-target speculation (Gordon Haskett) predates the bid itself
━━ WHO WAS ALREADY POSITIONED ━━
Michael Burry (Scion Asset Management) opened a ~3.5% position in April 2026 near $49, adding through Q1 — directly into the post-capitulation base. His publicly stated thesis at the time: PayPal was priced cheap enough (7-8x earnings) to attract "both PE firms and strategic acquirers." That's exactly what materialized three months later.
Post-bid, Burry has stated $60.50 is too low and he isn't selling.
Separately, disclosed congressional trading shows a member of the House Financial Services Committee building a position in the same March 2026 window, in the same $38-45 price band Burry was buying.
When a value investor with a documented pre-bid thesis and a lawmaker on the relevant committee are both accumulating in the same window, ahead of the same catalyst, it's a confluence worth noting.
━━ THE FUNDAMENTALS ━━
This isn't purely a deal-speculation trade. The underlying business supports the valuation independent of any acquisition:
▸ TTM P/E: ~8-10x vs PYPL's own 5-year average of ~27x
▸ Forward P/E: ~7.8-8.9x
▸ Revenue (TTM): $33.7B | Net income: $5.06B | FCF: $5.5B
▸ ROE: 25% | ROIC: 23%
▸ Next earnings: July 28
A business generating that level of free cash flow, trading at a third of its historical multiple, doesn't need a takeover to be interesting
━━ THE SETUP ━━
Completed capitulation + base + live bid + fundamental discount + informed buying in the same window. Multiple independent threads pointing the same direction.
Looking to enter around 48-50, with a long term positional mentality on this trade
━━
Educational content. Not financial advice. Investing carries risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
RBLX | Why I'm Betting Big on Roblox's FutureRoblox's latest quarter was objectively strong, even if the stock price didn't reflect it. In Q1 2026, the company reported $1.4 billion in revenue (+39% YoY), while bookings jumped 43% to $1.7 billion, significantly ahead of expectations..
Monthly unique payers surged 52% to 31 million, proving that users aren't just joining the platform, they're spending more money once they're there. Even more impressive, Roblox generated $629 million in operating cash flow and $596 million in free cash flow, both growing roughly 40% year over year
Those aren't the numbers of a struggling company, they're the numbers of a platform becoming a financial powerhouse
Roblox will report its Q2 2026 earnings after the market closes on Thursday, July 30, and I believe this could be one of the company's most important reports of the year. Investors will be watching bookings growth, Daily Active Users, monthly unique payers, free cash flow, and most importantly whether management raises its full year guidance after cutting it last quarter due to child safety initiatives
Any sign that engagement is stabilizing while monetization continues to accelerate could restore confidence in the stock. investors should also keep an eye on Grand Theft Auto VI, currently scheduled for November 19, as its launch could temporarily pull player engagement and spending away from other gaming platforms, including Roblox
However, I view that as a short term headwind rather than a long term threat because Roblox is a user generated platform and social ecosystem, not a single premium game.
📉 So Why Did the Stock Dump?
Despite crushing expectations on revenue, bookings, earnings and cash flow, Roblox shares sold off sharply over the past couple of months. The biggest reason wasn't deteriorating fundamentals it was management's decision to lower full year guidance after implementing stricter child safety measures and age verification systems
Those changes temporarily reduced engagement and daily active users as communication features became more restricted. Investors focused on slower short term user growth instead of the company's rapidly improving monetization, creating what I believe is a disconnect between the stock price and the underlying business
🌍 The Long Term Opportunity Is Massive
Wen I look at Roblox, I don't just see another gaming company, I see one of the few platforms building a digital economy from the ground up. Millions of creators are already earning money through Roblox, while users spend billions of hours inside its ecosystem every year. Management has repeatedly stated its ambition to capture 10% of the global gaming content market, and with better monetization, advertising, AI powered creation tools, and an expanding international audience, that goal doesn't seem unrealistic over the next decade. If Roblox executes, today's roughly $38 billion valuation could look surprisingly small compared to its long term addressable market
💰Zuckerberg Already Proved the Market Is Worth Fighting For
One reason I'm especially bullish is that some of the smartest companies in the world are spending enormous sums pursuing the same vision. Meta has invested more than $80 billion into Reality Labs since 2020, developing VR headsets, AR glasses, and the metaverse
That tells me one important thing, the opportunity is real. The difference is that Roblox already has what Meta spent years trying to build a massive, highly engaged virtual world with a thriving creator economy and strong monetization. Instead of burning tens of billions to attract users, Roblox already has them. If immersive digital experiences become the future of entertainment, Roblox enters that future with a significant head start
Short term volatility doesn't change my long term conviction. Markets often punish companies when guidance softens, even if the underlying business keeps improving. That's exactly what I think happened with Roblox . Strong revenue growth, accelerating bookings, expanding cash flow, rising payer conversion, and a business model that becomes stronger as more creators join the ecosystem make me believe the market is underestimating Roblox's future.
If management continues executing and keeps expanding monetization while navigating regulatory challenges, I believe today's weakness could eventually be remembered as one of the better long term buying opportunities in the gaming and metaverse space
Walmart May Be Trending LowerWalmart had a big run between 2022 and early 2026, but now it may be going the other way.
The first pattern on today’s chart is the pair of peaks in February and May. That double top may signal a reversal of the preceding uptrend.
Second, the retail giant gapped lower after announcing results on May 21. It stayed below levels from the session before making another push to the downside. Prices then recovered. But is that bounce a potential bearish flag?
Third, the 8-day exponential moving average (EMA) is below the 21-day EMA. That may reflect a short-term downtrend.
Fourth, Wilder’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has stayed under 50 after hitting oversold conditions. That may also be consistent with short-term weakness.
Finally, WMT is under its 50- and 200-day simple moving averages. That may reflect a longer-term reversal.
TradeStation has, for decades, advanced the trading industry, providing access to stocks, options and futures. If you're born to trade, we could be for you. Learn more here about TradingView’s Broker of the Year!
Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is no guarantee of future performance or success. There is a possibility that you may sustain a loss equal to or greater than your entire investment regardless of which asset class you trade (equities, options or futures); therefore, you should not invest or risk money that you cannot afford to lose. Online trading is not suitable for all investors. View the document titled Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options at www.TradeStation.com . Before trading any asset class, customers must read the relevant risk disclosure statements on www.TradeStation.com . System access and trade placement and execution may be delayed or fail due to market volatility and volume, quote delays, system and software errors, Internet traffic, outages and other factors.
Securities and futures trading is offered to self-directed customers by TradeStation Securities, Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and a futures commission merchant licensed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission). TradeStation Securities is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the National Futures Association, and a number of exchanges.
TradeStation Securities, Inc. and TradeStation Technologies, Inc. are each wholly owned subsidiaries of TradeStation Group, Inc., both operating, and providing products and services, under the TradeStation brand and trademark. When applying for, or purchasing, accounts, subscriptions, products and services, it is important that you know which company you will be dealing with. Visit www.TradeStation.com for further important information explaining what this means.
AAPL Under the Box — Reclaim or Breakdown?AAPL is trading below my PD-15 range, so today’s setup is about whether buyers can reclaim control or sellers continue pressing lower.
The PD-15 range comes from the previous day’s final 15-minute candle. I use that high and low as a clean decision box for the next session.
Today’s PD-15 Levels:
- PD-15 High: 328.33
- PD-15 Low: 325.99
Right now, price is below the PD-15 box, so buyers do not have clean control. If price can reclaim 325.99, I’ll watch to see if buyers can recover back toward 328.33. But the stronger bullish confirmation does not come until price reclaims the PD-15 high at 328.33.
Bullish Plan:
If AAPL reclaims 325.99, holds above it, then pushes back toward 328.33, I’ll watch for buyer recovery. A stronger bullish setup would need a reclaim of 328.33 with confirmation and volume.
If 328.33 is reclaimed and holds, the upside targets I’m watching are:
- 329.81 = Call TP1
- 331.72 = Call TP2
- 334.83 = Call TP3
Bearish Plan:
If AAPL stays below 325.99, rejects a retest, and breaks the Opening Range Low with confirmation and volume, I’ll watch for downside continuation.
The downside targets I’m watching are:
- 323.59 = Put TP1
- 321.68 = Put TP2
- 318.57 = Put TP3
The red lines above price are call targets, but they can also act as resistance.
The green lines below price are put targets, but they can also act as support.
For me, the trade is simple:
Below 325.99, sellers have pressure.
Above 325.99, buyers are trying to recover.
Above 328.33, buyers have stronger control.
I’m not predicting. I’m waiting for agreement.
If this breakdown helped, drop a boost, comment your bias, and follow for more premarket game plans.
Are you watching the reclaim or the breakdown today?
YGO — Study the Levels. Wait for Agreement. Trade with Discipline.
Disclaimer: This idea is for educational purposes only and is not financial advice. I’m sharing my chart breakdown, levels, and trade plan. Always do your own research and manage your own risk.
NVIDIA | Momentum or DistributionAI Leadership Faces a Critical Test – Momentum or Distribution?
NVIDIA begins the week at a pivotal technical level as markets assess whether institutional investors continue accumulating AI leaders or begin rotating into other sectors. While the long-term AI narrative remains intact, short-term price action is likely to be driven by earnings expectations, valuation sentiment, and overall Nasdaq strength.
The first hour of trading could provide valuable insight into institutional positioning for the week ahead.
Key Market Drivers
🤖 Continued global investment in AI infrastructure and enterprise computing.
💻 Data center and GPU demand remain the primary long-term growth engine.
📊 U.S. earnings season could reshape expectations for the semiconductor sector.
🏦 Treasury yields and Federal Reserve outlook may influence high-growth technology valuations.
🌍 Geopolitical developments and semiconductor export policies remain key sentiment risks.
Trading Plan
🟢 Bullish Scenario:
Look for a sustained move above the opening range supported by rising volume, signaling institutional accumulation.
🔴 Bearish Scenario:
Failure to hold key intraday support or repeated rejection near resistance may indicate profit booking and short-term distribution.
"The biggest opportunities aren't created by headlines—they're created when institutional capital confirms the trend. Let price lead, not emotion."
Reddit is showing signs of double correctionI have posted a few charts on Reddit highlighting good zones for long entries in the stock.
The current run from March 2026 lows has been deciting a corrective structure i.e., a bull run in the overall bear trend. We have one more upmove pending in this bull run which will take reddit towards 225-250$ mark and thereafter resume its downward journey towards the 110$ levels, at which it would be a great buy.
From now till late Sep - Oct, buy reddit till 225-250$ mark. Thereafter short reddit till 110$ for it to complete the entire correction of its cycle since IPO.
MSFT: How Long Until Structure Breaks?Primary Scenario
ADJUSTMENT: We primarily expect imminent declines that should take the stock directly into our green Target Zone ($294.15–$252.08). Within this zone, an interim low should eventually form, setting the stage for a counter-move.
Alternative Scenario
ADJUSTMENT: There’s a chance MSFT could rise soon, break through resistance at $472.21, and form a high just below resistance at $562.17. However, selling pressure is then expected to increase again, targeting our green Target Zone ($294.15–$252.08) (probability: 32%).
Long-Term Outlook
The daily chart shows the path of the larger corrective move. Ultimately, further sell-offs into the blue Long-Term Entry Range ($212.18–$118.87) are expected before a sustained trend reversal is likely. However, if MSFT shows more strength in the near term than previously anticipated, price could set a new all-time high above resistance at $562.17 before the (then somewhat delayed) Long-Term Entry Range is reached later on (probability: 36%).






















