I'm worried for BIT DIGITAL. It can lose -75% of share value. At 50 cents
Bit Digital would be prices as a distressed, option like stub on #crypto and #AI
Rather than a normal business.
A coherent. bear case says it deserves that treatment.
Why?
1. Hyper cyclical BTC linked business model
2. Regulatory and political overhang on mining/crypto
3. Execution risk in the HPC/AI pivot story.
4. Balance sheet and cash flow vulnerability.
5. Narrative fatigue and sentiment risk.
E-Commerce King Recharges: Why MELI is a Buy at Trendline
The Bull Case Description
Technical Setup: The monthly chart for MercadoLibre (MELI) shows one of the most consistent long-term growth trajectories in the market. We are currently seeing a healthy consolidation phase where the price is interacting with a major multi-year ascending trendline.
From a Fibonacci perspective, the $2,020 level (Fib 1) acted as a crucial pivot. As long as the price maintains its structural integrity above the $2,000–$2,100 zone, the path of least resistance remains upward. The next major technical milestone is the 1.618 extension at $4,274, followed by a blue-sky target at the 2.618 level ($14,373) for the patient long-term investor.
Fundamental Drivers:
E-commerce Dominance: MELI continues to widen its moat through Mercado Envios. With nearly 75% of items delivered within 48 hours across a challenging Latin American geography, its logistics network is virtually impossible for competitors to replicate.
Fintech Tailwinds: Mercado Pago has evolved from a simple payment tool into a full-scale financial ecosystem. The rapid expansion into credit and yielding accounts is driving massive ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) growth, even in high-inflation environments.
New Frontier Potential: Recent news regarding the reopening of the Venezuelan market offers a massive, untapped e-commerce and fintech frontier that could fuel the next decade of growth.
Margin Resilience: Despite heavy investments in logistics and credit expansion, the company’s ability to maintain high revenue growth ($7.41B in Q3, up ~40% YoY) demonstrates the power of its ecosystem.
The Verdict: We are looking at a "Best in Breed" compounder trading at a technical "buy zone." The combination of an unmatched logistics moat and a high-growth fintech engine makes MELI a cornerstone for any growth-oriented portfolio.
$VNOM – The Permian's "Cash Flow King" Testing 2026 Breakout!⛽⛽⛽
The Business Model: Unlike traditional drillers, Viper doesn't spend a dime on rigs or fracking. They own the mineral rights to over 12,500 net royalty acres in the Permian Basin.
When giants like Diamondback Energy or ExxonMobil pump oil on their land, Viper takes a cut of the revenue with zero capital expenditure.
This results in industry-leading gross margins of nearly 98%.
As of February 17, 2026, NASDAQ:VNOM is trading at **$44.25** and yielding a massive 5.37% - 5.77%.
Because they have almost no overhead, they are a "dividend machine," with projections suggesting the distribution yield could climb as high as 7.4% later this year as new production from their 2025 "Drop-Down" acquisition goes live.
The Technical Squeeze: NASDAQ:VNOM is currently consolidating in a ascending channel.
After bouncing off the **$36.00 support level** in January, it has reclaimed its 200-day moving average ($38.83) and is now eyeing the channel resistance at $64.00.
The Analyst Consensus: Wall Street is nearly unanimous on this one. 13 out of 15 analysts rate NASDAQ:VNOM as a "Buy," with a high-end price target of **$72.00**—representing a potential 62% upside from current levels.
Why this is a "Solid" Buy at Support:
Debt-Free Growth: Viper recently sold off non-core assets to slash their debt-to-capital ratio to just 12%, making them one of the most financially stable players in the entire energy sector.
Intrinsic Value: While the stock trades at $44.25, Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models estimate the "intrinsic value" of their mineral rights at closer to $101.20 per share. You're essentially buying the land at a 58% discount.
The "Diamondback" Moat: About 59% of their revenue comes from wells operated by their parent company, Diamondback Energy, giving them a "front-row seat" and predictable visibility into future drilling schedules that other royalty companies lack.
SPCX's first major reality check | great company/great stockThe Difference Between a Great Company and a Great Stock
SpaceX entered public markets with extraordinary expectations. The company's IPO attracted global attention as investors sought exposure to one of the most ambitious companies in technology and space.
The initial market reaction reflected that enthusiasm. Strong demand coincided with a sharp increase in the share price as investors competed for exposure to a company with significant long-term growth potential.
Now, SpaceX is trading at its lowest price since listing. The move raises a question that applies to every major IPO:
Does a great company always make a great investment at any price?
The answer depends on valuation.
A stock price does not only represent what a company is today. It represents what investors believe that company can become in the future, adjusted for risk and the price they are willing to pay.
When expectations become extremely optimistic, even a strong business can experience a falling share price if investors begin reassessing whether the current valuation is justified by future growth.
This is the process of price discovery.
Following an IPO, the market moves beyond initial excitement and begins evaluating the company through a different lens. Investors start focusing on questions such as:
Can future growth justify the current valuation?
How much investment will be required to achieve that growth?
Can future returns support the price investors are paying today?
For SpaceX, these questions are particularly relevant because the space industry is capital intensive. Building launch systems, expanding satellite networks and developing future technologies require significant investment before long-term returns can fully materialise.
That does not mean the business opportunity has disappeared. It means public markets evaluate companies differently from private markets. Investors continuously balance future potential against the price they are paying today.
Another factor being monitored is the potential impact of IPO lockup expirations. These agreements temporarily restrict certain early investors and insiders from selling shares. As restrictions approach expiration, markets consider whether additional shares becoming available could affect the balance between supply and demand.
However, lockups are only one part of the equation. They influence market structure, but they do not determine the value of the company. The broader question remains whether the price investors are paying reflects realistic expectations for future growth.
SpaceX trading at its lowest price since listing is not simply a story about a falling stock. It is an example of how markets transition from excitement to evaluation.
The company can remain innovative, ambitious and strategically important while investors adjust the price they are willing to pay based on changing expectations.
SpaceX highlights one of the most important principles in financial markets:
A great company and a great stock are not always the same thing.
Markets do not reward businesses only for their potential. They reward the difference between expectations and reality.
For traders, the lesson is to look beyond the narrative and understand what price is reflecting: growth expectations, valuation, risk and supply and demand.
Key Insight
The market does not ask whether a company is great. It asks whether the future investors are paying for is worth the price today.
put together by : Pako Phutietsile as @currencynerd
TELSA TSLA = Bullish
A few days ago, I highlighted this setup as liquidity was poised to be swept. Now, I’m actively positioned in the trade, targeting a strong swing higher.
The primary risk remains potential liquidity grabs below on the 4H timeframe, but every other element of confluence is aligned — structure, momentum, and key levels all support the bullish case.
Monday’s open looks promising. Let’s ride this momentum back into the green. 💚
MSFTFriends, my approach to reading charts is very simple.
Technical Note: From a technical perspective, MSFT closed below the IRL(Internal Range Liquidity)candle on the Daily timeframe, further strengthening the current bearish trend. This confirms this confluence as a key institutional supply zone. Meanwhile, the price remains above Long-term support around 34x Price range.
Let the market come to your zones and show its hand. Trade safe and manage your risk! Always wait for your own confirmations before entering the market. Classic trading strategy where you lock in profits during market rallies and purchase assets at a discount when their prices pull back. The goal is to accumulate fundamentally strong assets at lower prices, anticipating they will rebound to new highs.
Risk Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always practice proper risk and position sizing. Stop Loss Must if you want to be a profitable Trader.
MARKET VIEW:-
Current Bias: Bearish
Preferred Strategy: Sell the Rise – Wait for Confirmation
Target aims for $130Sellers exhausted?
Bulls reasserting control?
A sustained move above $103 could target previous resistance of around $130
Which where a W pattern formation points towards as well.
Consenus by analysts is a "hold"
But if consumer spending picks up under favourable economic conditions earnings could expand and catch up to peers like #WMT
AMZNTechnical Note: From a technical perspective, AMZN closed below the BOS(Break of Structure) candle on the Daily timeframe, further strengthening the current bearish trend. This confirms this confluence as a key institutional supply zone. Meanwhile, the price remains above short-term support around 226-214 Price range.
Let the market come to your zones and show its hand. Trade safe and manage your risk! Always wait for your own confirmations before entering the market. Classic trading strategy where you lock in profits during market rallies and purchase assets at a discount when their prices pull back. The goal is to accumulate fundamentally strong assets at lower prices, anticipating they will rebound to new highs.
Risk Disclaimer: This analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always practice proper risk and position sizing. Stop Loss Must if you want to be a profitable Trader.
MARKET VIEW:-
Current Bias: Bearish
Preferred Strategy: Sell the Rise – Wait for Confirmation
Title: Apple (AAPL) Testing Major Resistance
Apple (AAPL) has maintained a strong bullish trend after breaking out from a prolonged consolidation phase and reclaiming higher price levels above the Ichimoku Cloud. The recent impulsive rally has pushed price into a significant resistance zone around **$333–334**, where buying momentum is beginning to slow.
The chart suggests that this resistance area could trigger a short-term correction or profit-taking move. A healthy retracement toward the previous breakout level near **$316.00** would allow price to retest support while remaining above the bullish market structure. As long as AAPL holds above this support zone and the Ichimoku Cloud continues to provide dynamic support, the broader uptrend remains intact.
A rejection from current resistance followed by a controlled pullback could offer buyers a stronger entry before another attempt to make new highs.
### **Target:**
* **Primary Pullback Target:** **$316.06**
* **Resistance Zone:** **$333.00 – $334.00**
* **Bullish Invalidation:** A sustained break below **$316.00** could weaken the short-term bullish outlook and open the door for a deeper correction.
**Outlook:** Short-term **bearish pullback**, but the overall trend remains **bullish** while price stays above the $316 support area.
Oracle (ORCL): Oversold ConditionsOracle (ORCL): Oversold Conditions and Strong OCI Demand Point to a Tactical Rebound
We expect a tactical rebound in Oracle shares over the next two months. The stock has moved into oversold territory following a sharp correction, even though demand for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) remains strong and remaining performance obligations (RPO) have reached $638 billion. The main catalyst will be Oracle’s first-quarter fiscal 2027 earnings report, with investors focused on OCI growth, RPO trends, and capital expenditures (capex). Additional support could come from a rotation out of semiconductors and into software: the semiconductor ETF SMH is showing near-term weakness, while the software ETF IGV maintains an upward bias and continues to outperform the broader market.
Ticker: ORCL
Price at the time of analysis (July 16, 2026): $132.49
Current price (July 17, 2026): $123.71
Target: $158.21
Stop-loss: $115.34
Investment Thesis
Oracle combines resilient database and enterprise applications businesses with the rapidly growing OCI platform.
The recent correction appears to reflect concerns about funding and capital intensity rather than weakening demand. In Q4, OCI revenue increased by 93%, while RPO reached $638 billion, up $85 billion quarter over quarter. At the same time, major AI contracts worth $75 billion require customer prepayments or the use of customer-owned equipment, reducing Oracle’s funding burden.
Oracle’s Q1 FY2027 earnings report, expected in mid-September, will be the key near-term catalyst. FactSet consensus estimates call for revenue of $19.1 billion, up 28%; EPS of $1.73; cloud revenue of $11.5 billion; and OCI revenue of approximately $7.1 billion.
Because these estimates are close to management guidance, a modest beat may not be enough to drive a sustained re-rating. Positive signals would include RPO above $617.9 billion, capex below $19.0 billion, and evidence that backlog monetization can offset pressure from a 61.9% gross margin and negative free cash flow of $9.7 billion.
Sector rotation further strengthens the thesis. SMH currently appears weaker, while IGV maintains an upward bias and continues to outperform the broader market. This suggests capital may be rotating from AI semiconductors into software.
Continued OCI growth and a resilient software revenue stream could support ORCL. An RSI reading near 30, combined with the $119–132 support zone, increases the likelihood of a rebound toward $149–152.
Conclusion: Buy
The key conditions supporting the thesis are sustained RPO growth, capex discipline, and continued OCI momentum.
MSTR: Don't be Saylor's ATMLooking at the chart comparing MSTR versus the SPX, you are essentially looking at the "Volatility Multiplier" of the crowd's confidence in Michael Saylor.
The ratio between MSTR and the SPX is not a standard correlation; it is a leverage-adjusted signal.
When MSTR outperforms the SPX (the ratio line slopes upward), it confirms that liquidity is flowing into high-beta, Bitcoin proxy-linked assets.
When the ratio flattens or dips, it indicates that the market is "de-risking"—moving back into stables / broad-market indices like the SPX.
During the "Accumulation" phase of the 4-year cycle, you will often see this ratio consolidate.
During the "Parabolic" phase, the MSTR/SPX ratio tends to go vertical.
The most critical part of this chart is where it intersects with the company's Share Issuance events.
The "Saylor Effect": Historically, MSTR issuance announcements cause a localised dip in the MSTR/SPX ratio (as the market digests dilution), followed by an aggressive recovery if the market perceives the capital deployment as "accretive" (i.e., it buys enough BTC to justify the dilution).
Watch the ratio right after any "ATM" (at-the-market) issuance. If the ratio recovers quickly, the Institutional Bid is strong.
If the ratio stays suppressed, the market is signalling that the dilution is outpacing the value creation.
The Dilution-Dividend Balancing Act: Saylor’s issuance of common shares is a tactical manoeuvre designed to fund the aggressive accumulation of BTC.
However, this is constrained by their commitment to Series A preferred stock (STRC) dividends.
The Constraint: Equity issuance must create "accretive value" (each new share issued must increase the total BTC owned per share).
If the share price drops, issuance becomes dilutive rather than accretive, creating a "downward spiral" of BTC-per-share value.
The "Last Resort" Sales (The Liquidity Tripwire): This is the risk most analysts ignore. If the share price drops to a level where issuing common stock becomes aggressively dilutive, management is forced to either stop buying or sell BTC to fund operations/debt.
* The Projection: A sale of Bitcoin to fund operations would be a fundamental "trend break." It signals that the liquidity engine has stalled.
Keep a close watch on the USD Cash Reserve vs. Preferred Dividend Requirement.
If the cash reserve falls below the threshold required to cover dividends, the likelihood of a "forced sale" of BTC spikes, which would immediately compress the MSTR/SPX ratio.
$MCHP: Wave (5) Completed — False Breakout, Triggers Pullback📉 📉 📉
The semiconductor sector has enjoyed an incredible run, but sophisticated capital tracks when the trend exhausts.
If you are looking for an aggressive momentum pivot to compound capital, Microchip Technology Inc.
#MCHP is presenting a textbook structural short setup.
The daily chart shows a clean, completed macro 5-wave Elliott structure.
Friday's aggressive breakdown volume has officially confirmed a structural bull trap.
1. The Technical Setup: False Breakout & Liquidity Sweep Looking closely at the daily structure price finished its multi-month expansion at Wave (5), briefly sweeping liquidity just above the 105.38 High.
The Trap: MCHP attempted to sustain momentum above the vital 2024 high of 95.25, but completely failed to attract institutional follow-through.
Instead, it formed a massive distribution cluster.
The Confirmation: Friday’s -8.27% liquidation event slammed price straight down to 88.34. In a single daily session, sellers wiped out weeks of grinding price action, plunging straight back below the 95.25 structural floor on massive volume expansion.
The trap has sprung.
2. The Fundamental Catalysts: Re-Rating Premium Valuations.
A technical trap needs macro headwinds to sustain a downward move.
Friday gave us the ultimate fundamental double-whammy: The Sector Overhang: Broadcom's recent guidance data reset expectations regarding the blistering pace of macro #hyperscaler and #AI chip spending.
This removed a core growth catalyst that was keeping high-multiple semiconductor stocks afloat.
The Discount Rate Shift: Friday’s stronger-than-expected US jobs report (172,000 payrolls) effectively crushed immediate hopes for interest rate cuts.
Stocks trading at premium multi-year forward P/E valuations are hyper-sensitive to these macro discount rate changes.
When rate cuts are delayed, high-multiple semi valuations contract rapidly.
🎯 Tactical Short Execution Plan
Because the daily candle closed right at its session lows (88.34), shorting directly into the hole carries near-term execution risk if the broader index attempts a Monday morning relief bounce.
We want to execute on a low-volume retest of the broken floor.
The Entry Zone: Look to establish a short position on a lower-timeframe dead-cat bounce back toward the 91.50 – 93.00 cluster (retesting the breakdown value area).
The Stop Loss (Invalidation): Strict stop placement on a daily close back above 95.25 (the broken 2024 high line).
If the bulls manage to re-claim this level, the bearish thesis is instantly invalidated and we preserve capital.
Take Profit (TP) Target 1: The pink consolidation zone between 80.00 and 83.00.
This marks the peak of the previous Wave (3) cluster and serves as natural structural support.
Take Profit (TP) Target 2: The blue structural liquidity pool down at 68.00 if the tech sector encounters a deeper macro ABC correction.
💬 What's Your View on Semis?
Is MCHP signalling a broader tech rotation, or do you think the dip buyers step back in at the 80s support block?
Drop your targets and perspectives in the comments section below!
If you want to follow the compounding journey and catch updates on this short trade, make sure to hit that Follow button!
(Disclaimer: Not financial advice.
Manage your risk according to your own capital allocation rules.
If you don't have any Rules make them before entering financial markets)
PayPal’s Biggest Moment Since the IPOPayPal may be preparing for a major deal!
Stripe and private equity firm Advent International have submitted a $60.50 per share offer to acquire the company, putting PayPal’s valuation above $53 billion.. The proposal is reportedly supported by around $50 billion in committed financing
However, this is not a confirmed acquisition yet.. The offer is unsolicited, PayPal has not officially responded, and all parties involved have declined to comment. Still, reports suggest PayPal has hired Goldman Sachs and Evercore to explore strategic options, including a possible sale or separating parts of the business. The company may not be actively searching for a buyer, but it appears open to understanding what the market believes it is worth
🛒 Stripe Could Gain a Massive Consumer Network
The strategic appeal is clear. Stripe built its reputation by providing payment infrastructure for online businesses, becoming one of the most important players behind digital commerce. While millions of consumers use services powered by Stripe, most do not interact with the brand directly
PayPal would give Stripe access to the consumer side of payments. The company brings around 439 million active accounts, roughly $1.8 trillion in annual payment volume, and Venmo, one of the strongest digital payment brands in the US
A merger would allow Stripe to operate across the entire payment ecosystem, serving merchants while also building deeper relationships with consumers through PayPal, Venmo, and Stripe’s Link wallet. PayPal’s Braintree platform would strengthen Stripe’s merchant processing business, while PayPal’s stablecoin and crypto related assets could complement Stripe’s recent moves in blockchain infrastructure through acquisitions like Bridge and Privy
On paper, the combination would create one of the largest payment networks in the world. But the reality could be more complicated. Stripe would also inherit older technology, overlapping products, and several businesses that PayPal has struggled to bring together effectively. Expanding into consumer payments could be valuable for Stripe, but integrating the two companies would be a significant challenge.
💵 Why Advent Sees Opportunity
For Advent International, the attraction is different. The private equity firm is likely focused on PayPal’s strong cash generation rather than strategic expansion
PayPal generated about $5.6 billion in reported free cash flow last year, or around $6.4 billion on an adjusted basis. A $53 billion purchase price represents roughly 8 times adjusted free cash flow, before accounting for debt, financing costs, and other expenses.
That type of situation is attractive to private equity investors. PayPal is a mature company with a strong brand, significant cash flow, and potential opportunities to reduce costs. Outside the public markets, the company could make bigger changes without facing constant pressure from quarterly earnings expectations
A private ownership structure could allow Stripe and Advent to restructure the business, sell certain assets, separate the consumer and merchant operations, or eventually bring the company back to the public market.
🤔 Is $60.50 Per Share Enough?
The offer represents a meaningful premium compared with PayPal’s recent stock price, but some investors believe it undervalues the company’s long term potential. PayPal traded above $78 only a year ago, and rebuilding its global network of consumers and merchants would be extremely difficult and expensive
Investor Michael Burry, who owns PayPal shares, has already argued that the offer is too low. His valuation may be aggressive, but the larger argument is understandable, Stripe and Advent would not be willing to spend more than $53 billion if they did not believe PayPal’s assets could eventually be worth significantly more
PayPal became a takeover target because investors lost confidence in its ability to complete its turnaround. Stripe and Advent appear to believe the company’s underlying assets are worth more than the market currently recognizes. The $60.50 offer gives shareholders a possible exit after years of disappointing performance, but it may only be the starting point in a much larger negotiation.
#PATH: When two years of falling turned into a reversalNYSE:PATH
On the two-week timeframe, a long-term accumulation base is forming, marking the end of a multi-year downtrend. Price has broken out of a descending wedge and successfully retested it from above, stabilizing above the key global demand zone. The main support for the asset is the strong multi-year range of 9.20–10.00 dollars, confirmed by abnormally high trading volume. Large players are systematically defending this range with limit order blocks, as confirmed by long lower wicks on higher timeframe candles.
The indicators confirm the transition to an upward impulse. Price has settled above the 20-SMA (11.05 dollars) and the 50-SMA (10.97 dollars), while a break above the 200-SMA (12.95 dollars) would trigger strong acceleration. RSI (14) has moved from critically oversold to neutral territory (around 54), leaving room for growth, while the MACD histogram has formed a bullish convergence.
Current levels (12.15 dollars) offer a strong entry point with a favorable risk-to-reward ratio. The nearest target is 18.44–19.48 dollars, with a medium-term target of 28.00 dollars. A stop-loss should be placed on a two-week close below the absolute low of 9.20 dollars.
IREN Holders : Quick UpdatePrice has returned to a major support zone that previously held in Dec 2025 and Apr 2026. Both times we tapped this level, the chart saw strong follow‑through - roughly 80–100% upside within the following month.
That doesn’t guarantee the same outcome now, but the risk/reward is elevated at this area based on historical behavior.
Invalidation:
This idea becomes invalid below $30.00.
Final Note:
Never get married to a ticker. If you’ve been holding IREN since Sept 2025, you already know how brutal this market cycle has been. Manage risk, stay objective, and let the chart tell the story and ride the trend.
Ley
Bullish potential detected for AAPLEntry conditions:
(i) retracement back to potential support areas of $314.18 and $309.56 (from the open of 3rd June and 26th May, respectively) for NASDAQ:AAPL , and
(ii) observation of market reaction at these potential support areas noted above.
Depending on risk tolerance, the stop loss for the trade would be:
(i) below the rising 15 day EMA (currently $303.71), or
(ii) below the potential support/resistance area of $300.85 (from the open of 17th June), or
(iii) below the rising 50 day moving average (currently $297.77).
Why Netflix Stock Crashed After "Good" Earnings!Netflix Has Proven Streaming Works, Now It Has to Prove It Can Keep Growing
Netflix no longer has to convince investors that streaming is a profitable business
The bigger question now is whether it can keep growing as the business matures. Investors remain cautious, with the stock down more than 40% over the past year. Its Q2 FY26 results did little to change that sentiment, as shares fell about 8% in after hours trading
Last quarter, Netflix walked away from a proposed deal with Warner Bros Discovery. That decision helped it avoid an expensive bidding war and brought in a $2.8 billion breakup fee. But it also closed off a faster path to future growth. Instead, Netflix now has to drive expansion on its own through higher subscription prices, a larger advertising business, live programming and a broader mix of content
The pressure is increasing as competition for viewers becomes tougher. YouTube continues to gain market share on television, free streaming platforms like Tubi are attracting more users, and traditional media companies are leaning on live sports to keep audiences engaged. Netflix's answer is simple. Give people more reasons to open the app while protecting the strong economics that made the business successful in the first place
Netflix Q2 FY26
Income Statement
- Revenue rose 13% year over year to $12.6 billion, missing estimates by about $20 million
- Operating margin came in at 33%, down one percentage point from a year ago
- Earnings per share increased 11% to $0.80, beating expectations by $0.01
Balance Sheet
- Cash and short-term investments: $9.1 billion
- Total debt: $14.4 billion
FY26 Guidance
- Revenue is expected to grow 13% to 14%, reaching roughly $51.2 billion
- Operating margin guidance remains unchanged at 31.5%, about two percentage points higher than last year
What Stood Out?
Results were solid, but investors wanted more .. Revenue and earnings were mostly in line with expectations. Operating margins came in ahead of Netflix's own forecast, but the company only narrowed its full year guidance instead of raising it. Margins were slightly lower than last year because more content costs were recognized early in the year. Management expects margins to improve in the second half, with Q3 operating margin projected at 33%, compared with 28% a year ago. Still, Wall Street was hoping for a stronger outlook. Expected Q3 revenue growth of 12% would be Netflix's slowest pace since 2023
The advertising business is growing as planned .. Netflix reaffirmed its goal of generating about $3 billion in advertising revenue during 2026. The company expects to finalize U.S. upfront advertising commitments within the next few weeks. It is also expanding automated ad buying to Pause Ads and live programming this summer, making it easier for smaller advertisers to participate. Long term growth will depend on how efficiently Netflix can automate its advertising platform
Live events continue to deliver strong returns .. Members watched 97 billion hours during the first half of the year, up 2% from last year and slightly faster than 2025 growth. Live programming will account for just over 5% of content spending next year and only about 1% of total viewing hours. Even so, it has driven six of Netflix's ten biggest subscriber sign up days over the past five years. Live sports and special events appear to generate new customers more effectively than they generate viewing hours
Generative AI is becoming part of production .. Netflix said GenAI tools were used across roughly 300 titles in 2026, mainly during post-production. The company highlighted improvements such as larger crowd scenes, historical battle sequences, and world building that would have been difficult or too expensive to create otherwise. Management presented AI as a way to expand creative possibilities rather than simply reduce costs.
Share buybacks reached a record level .. Netflix repurchased $4.7 billion of its own stock during the quarter, the largest buyback in company history. It still has $27.1 billion remaining under its authorization following April's new $25 billion program.
Free cash flow declined to $1.5 billion from $2.3 billion, largely because of taxes related to the Warner Bros. breakup fee. Management left its full year free cash flow target of roughly $12.5 billion unchanged
Netflix is sharing less engagement data .. Starting in 2027, the company will publish its "What We Watched" report once a year instead of twice and separate it from earnings announcements. Management wants investors to focus more on revenue and operating profit than viewing hours.. This follows its earlier decision to stop reporting subscriber numbers. The shift suggests Netflix wants to be valued like a mature, consistently growing business.
However, it also limits transparency. Engagement has long been one of management's most important performance metrics, and subscriber churn remains undisclosed, which is unusual for a subscription company
Becoming the Bundle
Netflix originally disrupted traditional television by offering an ad free, on demand experience. Now it is gradually bringing back some of the same features that defined the old TV model
As of May, Netflix's ad supported plan reached more than 250 million monthly active viewers, up from 190 million six months earlier. The company expects advertising revenue to roughly double to around $3 billion this year. Growing the audience is only the first step. The next challenge is turning that audience into higher advertising revenue through better targeting and improved monetization
That helps explain Netflix's approach to live sports. Rather than competing directly with ESPN or Prime Video for full season rights, Netflix is focusing on major events that attract large audiences and premium advertisers
Its new MLB agreement includes Opening Night, the Home Run Derby, and the Field of Dreams game. This season, Netflix will also stream five NFL games, including Thanksgiving Eve, Christmas Day, and a potentially decisive Week 18 matchup
This strategy allows Netflix to create must-watch events without paying for hundreds of lower-profile games. It could prove to be a more efficient way to use sports to attract subscribers and advertisers. The remaining question is whether viewers will consistently return for individual events instead of choosing platforms dedicated to sports year round
The strategy goes beyond sports. Netflix recently added TF1's live channels and on demand content directly into its French service. Instead of buying an entire media company, Netflix is positioning itself as the platform where viewers can access content from multiple providers
The company is also expanding into video podcasts, short form content, and licensed videos from publishers. Together, these efforts show that Netflix wants to become more than a destination for its original series. It wants to become an app that users open every day.
That could increase engagement without matching the high costs of premium scripted content. At the same time, it introduces new challenges. Ads, live programming, sports, podcasts, games, third party channels, and short-form video all need to fit together. If the experience feels fragmented, Netflix risks rebuilding the same crowded television bundle it once replaced.
The Battle for Attention
Recent Nielsen data highlights the growing competition. Streaming accounted for 47.6% of U.S. television viewing in April, up from 44.3% a year earlier. Cable's share continued to decline, falling from 24.5% to 21.6%
Netflix captured 7.8% of total TV viewing in April, slightly above last year's 7.5%, but below its 9% peak in December, when *Stranger Things* and Christmas Day football boosted viewing. Monthly numbers naturally fluctuate with content releases, but the broader competitive trend is becoming increasingly clear..
YouTube reached a record 13.4% share of television viewing in April. Amazon Prime Video climbed to 4.2%, helped by its NBA rights, while Tubi reached a record 2.3%. The fastest-growing competitors are not relying only on expensive scripted shows. They combine creator content, live sports, free programming, and different forms of entertainment
Netflix argues that customer satisfaction and retention matter more than total viewing hours, and that makes sense for a subscription business. Even so, engagement remains central to its strategy. More viewing creates additional advertising inventory, improves returns on content spending, reduces subscriber churn, and makes future price increases easier to justify
Netflix still has several powerful growth drivers. Its advertising business is expanding, pricing power remains intact, and operating leverage should support low double digit growth.. But with the stock trading at a premium valuation, investors want proof that the company's broader entertainment strategy is leading to higher engagement, better monetization, and stronger long-term returns. If not, Netflix could become a more complicated business without becoming a more valuable one.
AMD: The Trailing Stop Did Its Job — A Full Trade From Entry to This is the closing update to our AMD trade—a position documented from the breakout to the final exit.
The journey began with a powerful Stage 2 breakout and strong relative strength. Instead of setting a fixed take-profit target, the position was managed around price structure.
As AMD continued forming higher highs and higher lows, the trailing stop was raised four times. Each adjustment reduced the remaining risk while still giving the trend enough room to continue.
Now, the final trailing stop at approximately 493.83 has been hit.
Trade summary:
Entry: 219.56
Initial stop loss: 186.02
Initial risk: 15.27%
Final trailing stop: 493.83
Approximate realized gain: 124.91%
The most important lesson is not that AMD moved this far.
The lesson is that we never needed to predict how far it would go.
We defined where the trade was wrong before entering.
We did not limit the upside with an arbitrary price target.
We raised the risk floor only after the structure improved.
And when price traded through the final trailing stop, the trade was over.
This is what risk-first trend following looks like:
Manage the downside first.
Follow the higher-low structure.
Let the market determine the size of the winner.
Let the trailing stop determine when the journey ends.
The best trades are not always the ones we predict perfectly. They are the ones we manage consistently from entry to exit.
Thanks for the trend, AMD.
Previous AMD case studies:
1. Powerful Stage 2 Breakout With Strong Momentum
2. Can This Trailing Stop Protect AMD From the Next Pullback?
3. When The Trailing Stop Starts Moving Higher
4. 4th Trailing Stop Update — Risk First, Profit Second
Educational market research only. Not financial advice. Always conduct your own research.
ALLT — Long: Two independent systems aligned, 2.4:1 R/RSetup
I run two backtested systems on my names: a multi-timeframe EMA trend system (PF 1.87 on ALLT, 2016–2026) and a classic Ichimoku san-yaku system — TK cross + price above cloud + chikou clear (PF 2.44, same window). Both fired long on ALLT within days of each other (6/30 and 7/7), and both are still long. That cross-validation is the reason for this post.
Ichimoku picture (daily)
Tenkan over kijun, price above the cloud, chikou clear. Full three-role alignment
Price broke out of the June cloud tangle on volume and is holding above the kumo
Forward cloud is bullish and rising into August. Trend support building underneath (~7.60–8.00)
The trade
Entry zone: ~8.48
Stop: 7.96 (under the kijun and the July pivot — if we're back below there, the setup failed)
Target: 9.70 (prior resistance / R1)
R/R: ~2.4:1
Fundamental kicker
Turnaround in progress: three straight quarters of double-digit revenue growth, GAAP profitable again, 71% gross margins, SECaaS ARR +59% YoY, ~$98M cash against a ~$385M cap. FY guidance reaffirmed.
Risks
Micro-cap, thin liquidity, gaps hard through stops. Size accordingly. This is my plan, not advice.






















