Long
Long
AMZN | Healthy Pullback Complete — Buyers Eye The $278 Liquidity
By analyzing the #AMZN (Amazon) chart on the Daily timeframe, we can see that price remains firmly within a long-term uptrend, riding cleanly inside a rising price channel and printing higher structure along the way.
Each leg up has confirmed the trend with a fresh bullish BOS — strong evidence that buyers remain in control of the bigger picture.
📊 Daily Timeframe
On the Daily, the structure is textbook bullish — a series of BOS to the upside inside the ascending channel. In the most recent leg, price pulled back below the 0.5 equilibrium ( $238.82 ) — a healthy, well-earned correction rather than a sign of weakness — and reacted right from the daily Order Block ( $219.58 – $226.49 ), exactly where demand should step in.
Price is now trading around $245.34 , pressing into a zone that also acts as a bearish Order Block, so I expect it to pause and consolidate here for a bit. The key trigger: a daily candle close above $249.75 would print an iCHoCH to the upside and confirm the continuation — opening a clear path toward the buy-side liquidity (BSL) resting overhead at $278.82 (the 1.0 extension). The whole bullish thesis stays valid above the Protected Low at $195.91 , with the deeper Breaker Block ( $188.71 – $198.99 ) beneath it as structural support.
⏱️ 1H Timeframe
On the 1H, price had been printing bearish BOS after bearish BOS on the way down into the correction. That's the short-term picture that now needs to flip. The level to watch is the Protected High at $249.51 : if price can reclaim and break it, that's the lower-timeframe confirmation that buyers have wrestled back control — and it aligns perfectly with the daily $249.75 trigger, stacking both timeframes into one clean signal for the push toward the liquidity above.
🎯 The Bias
My base case is bullish continuation. The daily uptrend is intact, the correction into discount is complete, and price has already reacted from the Order Block. What I want now is confirmation: a daily close above $249.75 (and the 1H reclaim of $249.51). On that trigger, I look for the move toward the BSL at $278.82. In my view, as long as AMZN holds above the Protected Low ($195.91), every dip remains a buying opportunity rather than a reversal — but I'll respect that the current bearish OB may cap price briefly before the breakout.
📰 Fundamental Backdrop
The bullish structure lines up with a genuinely strong run of catalysts. Amazon just posted a record Prime Day, generating roughly $26.4 billion in US sales — a clear signal of robust consumer demand that should feed directly into Q2 numbers. On the AI front, the company launched a $25 billion bond sale to fund its aggressive data-center and cloud buildout (2026 capex tracking toward ~$200 billion), and just landed a high-profile deal with Warner Bros. to power agentic AI advertising technology on AWS. Analyst sentiment is warming ahead of earnings — Goldman Sachs raised its price target, and the Street consensus sits well above current price. The next major catalyst is Q2 earnings on July 30, with analysts modeling around $196 billion in revenue on the back of AWS growth (last quarter grew 28%) and a booming ad business. The one caution worth flagging: heavy AI capex has compressed free cash flow and made the recent bond sale less favorably received — so the earnings print, and management's commentary on spend, will be the real test. For now, price action and fundamentals point the same way: higher.
This analysis will be updated as the market evolves. If this breakdown added value, drop a like 👍 and a comment 💬 to support the work — and share where you see Amazon heading next! Best Regards, BigBeluga 🐳 
Long
Long
$TTWO (Take-Two Interactive): Consolidation before GTA 6 in NOVThis could be one of the more interesting short-term investments for the second half of 2026 - Take-Two Interactive is just five months away from launching GTA VI.
Position #8: NASDAQ:TTWO - update
First of all, it's worth knowing that the next earnings report is already on August 7, and a large part of the community is expecting Trailer #3. Trailer #2 came out well over a year ago. A new trailer isn't guaranteed, but it would be both logical and quite likely - Rockstar has to start building the hype.
From an investor's perspective, the numbers will matter much more - and the most important number will obviously be pre-orders.
Looking at the main weekly chart, the key story is the accumulation range between $188 and $266. Last week we saw a new ATH, which was quickly rejected, and the stock is now trading about 9% below that record. What's funny is that the price is only around 12% above the previous ATH from 2021.
Five long years since the launch of Cyberpunk, and the stock is basically trading in the same area. That immediately makes me think one thing - I believe these shares will have to be sold with good timing, probably during the launch week. GTA VI is likely to be the biggest video game release in history, and it will probably end the way these events usually do - "sell the news."
That's my exit plan. As for the entry, I've personally bought two tranches, just as planned in my previous post, at $218 and $214.5, and I'm considering adding another one or even two.
I see two possible scenarios where increasing my exposure makes sense. The first is obviously a breakout above the current ATH ($266). A breakout from the yellow box on my chart gives a measured technical target of $344 - at that point, we could describe it as a continuation of what is most likely the ongoing Elliott Wave 5.
The second scenario worth considering is a correction after the recent rejection. The $217-$236 zone would look very attractive, as long as the rising trendline continues to act as support.
The final period leading into the launch will likely be a classic Phase of Excess in Dow Theory.
I also think November could mark the beginning of a bear market for this stock. The bull market on this ticker has been running since November 2022 (from the bottom around $90), so by then it would be almost exactly four years of gains.
Not financial advice, just my blog.
💙👽 
Long
Apple Analysis | 15-Minute TimeframeAfter a strong bullish rally, Apple reached its recent high about a month ago. What followed was a sharp decline that many traders considered unexpected.
However, when we analyze the move using our market structure strategy, the decline becomes much more logical.
The price first broke the major liquidity line with a Panic Wave, followed by a corrective rebound. After that, the market formed a Despair Wave, pushing the price to its latest low before the overall structure started to shift again.
From there, Apple entered a new Markup phase, confirmed by a break of the bearish trend determination level.
Looking at the chart, the price is now approaching another significant trend determination level. A successful breakout would increase the probability of a larger bullish markup phase developing over the coming weeks.
However, this is the key point:
A bullish markup phase does not mean the market will move straight up. Markets naturally alternate between impulsive and corrective waves.
For that reason, I am currently watching two possible scenarios:
🟢 Scenario 1:
The price confirms the breakout and continues higher, signaling that the new bullish markup phase is already underway.
🔴 Scenario 2:
Before continuing higher, the market may need to accumulate additional liquidity. In that case, we could see another decline in the form of a Panic Wave followed by a Despair Wave, driving the price toward the M Waves 2 (Zone 1) area before buyers step back in and resume the uptrend. IBM - where the quiet money actually went this weekWhile the options tape spent the week chasing AI and semiconductor calls, DarkFlow's institutional block read shows the largest, most one-sided accumulation on the entire board landing somewhere far less crowded: IBM. Off-exchange, the big prints were being bought, not sold, and more decisively than in any other name on the tape - a genuine conviction footprint, not a chase. IBM was not alone in that quiet corner. The same patient bid showed up in the broad index through VOO and VTI, in defensives like UNH, and in the safest parking spot of all, T-bills via SGOV.
The context makes it sharper. This unfolded under a tightening macro backdrop - firmer yields, a stronger dollar, weaker gold - the kind of regime that pressures high-multiple growth and rewards quality and value. IBM is exactly the profile institutions rotate toward in that environment: defensive, cash-generative, and unloved by the crowd.
The read: this is accumulation into a name the tape is ignoring, at a time the macro favors it. When the quiet block buyers and the noisy options crowd pull in opposite directions like this, DarkFlow's read sides with the patient money this week. Watch for continuation to confirm the base; a decisive loss of the week's range would invalidate the read. IBM stays top of the watch list into next week, alongside a set of uncrowded coils just starting to tighten - EQT, VG, BBY - with a heavy July 17 expiry that should force the crowded names to show their hand.
Not financial advice. A flow-and-blocks observation from DarkFlow's own record. 
Long
Long
Long
Short
Short 
SPCX 4HS VOLSPCX remains in a 4H corrective trend, but price is approaching the key $140–$135 institutional support zone.
Options positioning confirms strong put concentration at $140 and $135, suggesting potential absorption. Market makers remain in BUY/PINNING mode with 69% confidence, while $145 is the gamma pivot.
A sustained reclaim of $150 would improve momentum and target $158–$160. Above $160, the next major distribution zone is $170–$172, followed by $200.
Holding $140–$135: bullish reversal potential toward $150 and $160.
Losing $135: bearish continuation toward $125, then $115. The deeper put wall remains at $100–$90.
Upside targets: $150, $158–$160, $170–$172, $200
Downside targets: $140–$135, $125, $115
Long
Long
Boeing ($BA): One of the Most Asymmetric Aerospace Setups Right Entry: $222
Stop: $175
Target: $300+
While most investors are focused on AI, semiconductors, and software, Boeing may be quietly building one of the more interesting long-term setups in the market.
The reason is surprisingly simple.
Commercial aviation is effectively a duopoly.
If an airline wants to purchase large commercial aircraft at scale, there are realistically only two major options: Boeing and Airbus. Despite years of operational challenges, delays, and negative headlines, the long-term demand for aircraft has not disappeared. In fact, global aircraft order backlogs recently reached record levels, representing roughly a decade or more of production for the industry.
What makes Boeing interesting today is not where the company has been.
It's where it appears to be heading.
Recent production data shows Boeing continuing to increase commercial aircraft output, including the launch of a new 737 MAX assembly line designed to support higher production rates over the next several years.
At the same time, Boeing's commercial backlog has grown to more than 6,100 aircraft with a total company backlog approaching $700 billion.
That's not the profile of a business facing demand problems.
That's the profile of a company trying to execute on demand it already has.
Another factor investors may be underestimating is geopolitical support.
Aerospace remains a strategic industry for the United States. Boeing is not just a commercial aircraft manufacturer; it is also deeply integrated into U.S. defense, exports, and industrial policy. Large international aircraft agreements often become part of broader diplomatic and trade discussions.
From a technical perspective, Boeing has spent years consolidating below previous highs while sentiment remains far from euphoric.
If execution continues improving, production ramps successfully, and upcoming earnings reinforce the recovery narrative, I believe the market could start pricing Boeing as a recovery story rather than a turnaround story.
The risk is obvious: execution issues, safety concerns, supply-chain disruptions, or a broader market shock.
But if those risks remain contained, the risk/reward here looks attractive.
My thesis is simple:
Global air travel demand continues to grow.
The Boeing-Airbus duopoly remains intact.
Production is gradually improving.
Backlog remains enormous.
Sentiment is still far below historical peaks.
Sometimes the biggest opportunities appear when a great business is still being judged by its past instead of its future.
Trade Setup
Entry: $222
Stop: $175
Target: $300+
Not financial advice. Just sharing my research and market observations.
#Boeing #BA #Stocks #Investing #SwingTrading #StockMarket #Aerospace #Airlines #ValueInvesting #MarketAnalysis #TechnicalAnalysis #TradingIdeas #WallStreet #LongTermInvesting 
Long
Long
Vertical Spread Analysis on GOOG 7/12Options Desk
Reminder: nothing in this section is a position or a recommendation. These are trades I analyzed on paper to show how a trader might think through the current setup. Do your own work before risking a dollar.
The situation the options market is handing us
From The Setup: GOOG's IV Rank is 63.4 and its IV percentile is 92.06, with earnings July 28 and the Fed decision July 29. The options market has already priced the fireworks. That single fact drives every structural decision this month.
Teaching moment #1: IV crush, or why "I was right and still lost money" happens
Implied volatility is the price of uncertainty, and GOOG options currently carry more uncertainty premium than they have in 92% of readings over the past year. The trap for newer traders: the moment earnings drop, that uncertainty resolves and the premium evaporates almost instantly. This is IV crush. A trader can buy a call, watch the stock gap up 4% on good earnings, and still lose money because the volatility premium collapsed faster than the stock moved. At the 92nd percentile, you're not just betting on direction. You're betting the move will be bigger than the already-large move the market has priced in.
Teaching moment #2: the expiry calendar is the whole game
Last issue we covered how an August expiry doesn't avoid a July 30 earnings event. This month the calendar splits cleanly in two: expirations on or before July 17 avoid the earnings and Fed cluster entirely, while expirations July 31 and later contain both binary events, back to back, whether you planned for them or not. There's no neutral choice. The trade analyzed below deliberately lives on the safe side of that line.
The trade I analyzed: put credit spread
Sell the $340 put, buy the $337.50 put, July 17 expiry (12 DTE)
Credit: $0.56 per share, $56 per contract ($112 on 2 contracts)
Max loss: $194 per contract, $388 total ($2.50 width minus the credit)
Breakeven: $339.44
Probability of profit: roughly 76%, using the shortcut POP ≈ 1 minus the short strike's delta (0.24)
Exit plan: close at 30% to 50% of max profit ($34 to $56 on the 2-lot) at any point before the July 17 expiration
The thesis is humble on purpose: GOOG stays above the $340 area, right around the level buyers defended in June, for twelve more days. Not "GOOG goes up." Just "GOOG doesn't break down." Because event fear has inflated all of July's premium, the seller collects unusually rich credit for that modest claim, and the position expires eleven days before the earnings risk it's being paid to fear. If it works, that's a 28.9% return on risk in 12 days.
Why this structure fits the confluence framework: it agrees with the technicals from The Setup (defended floor at $330-340, long term trend intact above the 200 EMA), it requires no opinion on the unfinished valuation work from Part 1, and it sidesteps the event cluster entirely. Every piece of the analysis points the same direction.
The trade I analyzed and passed on: iron condor
I also worked up an iron condor at the same expiry, and walking through why it didn't make the cut is probably the most useful part of this section.
Same put side: sell the $340 put, buy the $337.50 put
Plus a call side: sell the $375 call, buy the $377.50 call
July 17 expiry, credit $1.01 per share ($101 per contract), max loss $149 per contract
Breakevens: $338.99 and $376.01
Probability of profit: roughly 55%, using POP ≈ 1 minus the sum of both short deltas (0.24 + 0.21)
On paper it looks tempting. Nearly double the credit, and a 67.8% return on risk versus the spread's 28.9%. So why pass?
Put Credit Spread
Credit per contract: $56
Max loss per contract: $194
Return on risk: 28.9%
Est. probability of profit: ~76%
Loses if: GOOG below $339.44
Iron Condor
Credit per contract: $101
Max loss per contract: $149
Return on risk: 67.8%
Est. probability of profit: ~55%
Loses if: GOOG below $338.99 or above $376.01
Three reasons, in order of importance:
1. The call side fights my own technical read. The Setup flagged MACD curling upward and a tight EMA coil that tends to resolve with force. Selling a $375 call is a bet that the coil does not resolve upward. With an ATR of $11.51, that strike sits roughly four average trading days away. Publishing a chart read that says "early upward momentum" and then analyzing a trade that loses if that momentum shows up fails my own confluence test.
2. The POP gap is the price of the extra credit. 76% versus 55% is the seesaw in its purest form. The condor pays more precisely because it wins less often. More premium always means more ways to lose. There is no free lunch hiding in that credit column.
3. The fragile leg meets the near catalyst. The FOMC minutes land Wednesday, July 8, inside the trade window. A dovish read that lifts growth stocks threatens $375 quickly. The put side has a defended technical floor beneath it; the call side has nothing but air and hope above it.
To be clear, the condor isn't a bad trade. It's a different opinion about the same chart, one that says "nothing decisive happens for two weeks." It just isn't the opinion my own analysis supports right now. Knowing why you're rejecting a trade is worth as much as knowing why you're taking one.
NASDAQ:GOOG Short 
Long
Long
NIO: Massive Cyclical Floor Found? Target Set for +224% Move!### 1. The Macro Picture: Major Demand Zone Defense
Following a prolonged long-term macro decline through 2024 and early 2025, **NIO Inc. (NIO)** has constructed a highly visible cyclical floor. On the weekly timeframe, the stock is building a clear structural base right above a major **DEMAND ZONE** ranging between **$3.60 and $4.00**.
The price is currently holding at **$4.78**, and the system indicator has flipped to **WEEKLY BULLISH**, confirming an institutional accumulation phase and a shift in underlying market structure.
### 2. The Bullish Recovery Curve
The long-term custom curve projection outlines an aggressive cyclical recovery playbook:
* **The Macro Target:** Mapped out at **$12.87**, which represents a massive **+224.21% move (+$8.90 value gain)** from the absolute structural lows.
* **Technical Milestones:** To validate this macro arc, NIO needs to continue printing higher lows above the $4.00 demand floor, clear intermediate psychological resistance near $7.00, and push past double-digits ($10.00).
### 3. Momentum & Fuel Gauges
The **RSI Divergence Indicator is currently printing at 41.69**. This is a highly favorable, non-overbought level. It proves that the stock has an enormous amount of technical "fuel" and overhead runway to sustain a multi-month trend reversal without encountering early momentum exhaustion.
### 4. The 60-Day Countdown Catalyst
Keep a close eye on the fundamentals—NIO's next earnings report drops in **60 days**. In the highly competitive electric vehicle (EV) sector, delivery growth rates and margin improvement metrics during these quarterly updates serve as the exact fundamental catalyst required to validate long-term technical reversal zones.
---
**⚠️ Disclaimer:** *This analysis is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Trading stocks and options involves significant risk of loss. Always conduct your own thorough research and consult with a licensed professional before making any financial decisions.* 
Long
