Long
Short
Short
Long
NOW: Elliott Wave roadmap and the 149.60 confirmation testServiceNow is at a decision point: can the latest pullback give way to a sustained recovery above 146.98 and 149.60 USD, or was the advance from April another corrective rally? This daily-chart roadmap is neutral until price provides that evidence. The latest completed daily close used here is 131.17 on September 10, 2026; the analysis is dated September 11.
The larger wave context
The historical study begins at 9.20 on February 8, 2016. A working Cycle I interpretation reaches 141.52 on November 4, 2021, followed by a candidate Cycle II correction to 67.40 on October 13, 2022. The displayed chart starts at that 2022 low to keep the subsequent subdivisions and current decision levels readable.
Within a possible developing Cycle III, the advance to 239.62 on January 28, 2025 is labeled Primary 1. Its Intermediate subdivisions and the subsequent A–B–C decline are shown, with smaller-degree detail. The April 10, 2026 low at 81.24 is a candidate Primary 2 endpoint, not a confirmed one. The depth of that decline matters: labeling it a conventional Cycle IV after the 2021 Cycle I would introduce overlap and require a different structural interpretation.
What happened after C/5?
The recovery is carried forward as a provisional W–X–Y interpretation: 81.24 to 139.20 on June 1, back to 89.39 on June 25, then to 149.60 on August 31. The September pullback is traced through 136.38, a rebound to 146.98, and a provisional C endpoint at 130.64 on September 10. That final low may still change.
These labels organize the observed swings; they do not prove that the recovery is complete or that a new bullish impulse has begun. In particular, the internal C of Y remains open to revision. Selected historical and smaller-degree structures also retain uncertainty. Overlapping swings should not be forced into a five-wave count merely because the larger bullish narrative is attractive.
The decision framework
A recovery through 146.98 would challenge the immediate pullback. A daily close above 149.60, followed by a retest that holds, would provide stronger evidence for continuation. A brief move above resistance that quickly falls back beneath it would weaken that signal. Until then, waiting is a valid interpretation of the chart.
The target ladder is conditional:
• R1: 159–162 USD. The arithmetic 50% recovery of the decline from 239.62 to 81.24 is 160.43.
• R2: 178–181 USD. The arithmetic 61.8% recovery is approximately 179.12.
• R3: 208–212 USD. This is historical supply around the prior B-wave high of 211.48, rather than a Fibonacci calculation.
The formula for the first two levels is 81.24 + ratio × (239.62 − 81.24). These are retracements of the decline, not extensions of a newly confirmed impulse. Calculations are arithmetic despite the logarithmic chart display. Zone widths allow modest rounding; their horizontal extent is not a timing forecast.
The alternative and invalidation
Below 81.24, the April-bottom hypothesis fails and the 67–70 support area becomes relevant. Below 67.40, the current bullish Primary 1–2 interpretation requires revision. Neither distant structural threshold should automatically become a trade stop. Any eventual entry needs its own nearby invalidation and enough room to the next resistance to justify its risk.
The practical value of Elliott analysis is a framework that price can challenge. Here, the next useful checkpoint is whether NOW can reclaim and hold 149.60 with a more convincing internal structure. Until that happens, the bullish path remains a possibility, alongside the corrective alternative.
Educational chart interpretation, not a personalized investment recommendation. Prices are in USD on the TradingView feed shown; scenarios and wave counts can change. MRVL: Elliott Wave roadmap and the 254.60 confirmation testMRVL is recovering from its July low, but the daily chart has not yet confirmed that a new Primary fifth wave is underway. The first checkpoint is a daily close above 254.60, the August 27 high. Until then, the rebound can still be part of a larger correction.
This roadmap uses the displayed NASDAQ / Cboe One daily chart in USD. The latest completed daily bar, September 10, closed at 226.96. Premarket quotes are separate. The chart is logarithmic; the Fibonacci calculations below are arithmetic.
The structure behind the roadmap
The requested window begins March 17, 2020. That session reached 17.18, but the following day produced the lower pivot at 16.45, which is the wave origin used here.
The working Cycle count places at the December 2021 high of 93.85 and candidate at the January 2023 low of 33.75. The advance since then is treated as an unfinished Cycle . Within it, Primary 1 ends at 127.48, Primary 2 at 47.09 and Primary 3 at 329.88. The July 29 low of 162.90 is a candidate Primary 4, not an established final low.
Blue Primary labels and violet Intermediate subdivisions provide the next two degrees. Selected impulse and ABC segments are drawn, including the latest advance and June–July correction. This is not a claim that every smaller internal wave has been verified. The question marks on Primary 4 and 5 matter.
What would make the bullish case actionable?
A daily close above 254.60 would strengthen the recovery thesis. The next test would then be 264–268, rather than an immediate assumption that new highs follow. A failed breakout or failed retest would keep the corrective interpretation alive.
The distance between confirmation and that first resistance band is relatively modest. A breakout alone therefore does not establish an attractive trade. Any entry needs its own structural stop and sufficient room to the next obstacle after costs. The long-term invalidation levels below are not automatic trade stops.
The target ladder
R1: 264–268 USD brackets the 61.8% recovery of the June–July decline:
162.90 + 0.618 × (329.88 − 162.90) = 266.09.
R2: 325–332 USD brackets the previous 329.88 high. This is historical resistance, not a separate Fibonacci projection.
Z3: 343–348 USD becomes relevant only after a sustained break above 329.88. Its working fifth-wave guideline is:
162.90 + 0.618 × (329.88 − 33.75) = 345.91.
This projects 61.8% of the net Primary 0-to-3 advance from candidate Primary 4.
When the count must change
Below 162.90, the July-low recovery hypothesis fails and Primary 4 may extend. The alternative 153–157 zone surrounds the 61.8% retracement of the 47.09–329.88 advance, calculated at 155.12.
Below 127.48, the selected standard Primary impulse develops wave-1/wave-4 overlap and requires reassessment. Below 33.75, the January 2023 cycle-low thesis fails.
The Elliott perspective
The useful part of this count is the sequence of tests it creates. A plausible fourth-wave low can explain the rebound without proving that the correction has ended. Fibonacci relationships organize areas of interest; they do not establish probabilities.
The next observation is whether MRVL can reclaim 254.60 and then negotiate 264–268. The dotted paths illustrate conditional price scenarios, not forecast dates. This is an educational technical roadmap, not a personalized trade recommendation. 
Long
Long
Long
Long
Long
Long
Uber is back in the gameAcross all the sectors, Transportation and Consumer are the ones flashing promising setup for the coming weeks/months.
Uber, once an investor darling, has been been off focus for a couple of years now with its slowing revenue growth rates from 36% CAGR (last 5 years) to just at 16% last year. However, on the positive side, stock trades at PS of 2.6, PE of 15 and with a P/FCF of just 14. Extremely undervalued
Coming to the technical side, we have a Demark buy signal on 4D, 1W, 1Month along with both bullish (very strong) trend continuation (hidden divergences) as well as regular divergences on 1D to 1W setup showing the prices are set for a bull side reversal.
In addition, we have a strong Wyckoff accumulation setup which can see the prices reach almost 120$ in no time.
A strong foundation and a great stock to get in while retail investors crowd the AI trade 
Long
Long
Long
Apple: The channel just broke, iPhone Duo pre-order $340 target!Apple’s "Surprise and Shine" event held on September 9 saw the unveiling of new CEO John Ternus along with the iPhone Duo foldable phone, costing $1,999, and the A20 Pro-enabled iPhone 18 Pro series, whose price tag is set at $100 more compared to past products. In spite of the initially poor market reception due to margin issues, pre-market trading started on September 10 before yesterdays pre-order starts. Apple's stock climbed 3.56% to $326.57 on September 10 on 70 million shares a 31% increase from the three-months average.
There is a continuation pattern from the daily chart, where price breaks higher out of the rising channel resistance level ($317–$322) at $326.57 with strong volume of 31% above average. Moving averages are in agreement with the bull move, as price has returned to dynamic support levels TEMA 9 ($322.66), 50 EMA ($317.22), and 100 EMA ($304.73). On the other hand, momentum indicators are strong, where RSI is at 58.94, and MACD shows strong buy pressure.
Trade recommendation
Direction : Long
Entry horizon : $320 – $327
Primary target : $340
Secondary target : $360
Stop loss : Daily close below $317
Technical scenarios
iPhone Duo pre-order surge, supercycle re-rating : Strong iPhone Duo pre-orders validate the $1,999 price tag. Solid technical indicators (MACD expansion, rising RSI) and a verified channel breakout above $322 support targets at $340, $360, and $400 as analysts upgrade revenue models.
Pre-order in line,consolidation above breakout : Demand meets expectations. Price consolidates between $317 and $327 with support at the TEMA 9, holding gains above the stop at $317 ahead of official sales data.
Margin disappointment,channel re-entry : Higher 2nm chip costs squeeze margins, sending price back into the channel. A daily close below $317 fails the breakout and opens downside risk toward the 50 and 100 EMAs ($317–$304).
Long
Long
MSFT: Capitulation to New HighWalking this one in order, because the sequence is the whole story.
First, the decline. MSFT spent months grinding lower in stages, each bounce failing a bit sooner than the last, until it capitulated to 349.20, the low of this entire chart, on a volume day that ran nearly 2x average. That's the kind of print that usually marks exhaustion rather than mid-trend weakness.
Next, the retest. Price bounced hard off that low, ran up toward 406, then rolled over again, but this second pullback only reached 377.39, well above the 349.20 low. A higher low after a capitulation flush is one of the more reliable early signs that selling pressure is fading, and it's marked on the chart.
Then, the gap. From that higher low, MSFT didn't grind back up, it gapped. A single overnight jump from a 390.54 close to a 437.90 open, roughly 12% in one session, on volume more than 3x normal. Gaps that size on real volume tend to reprice a stock rather than get filled quickly, and this one didn't get filled.
After that, follow-through. The stock kept climbing in the weeks after the gap, eventually printing a fresh high at 517.78, comfortably above every level on this 200-day chart.
Where that leaves things now: MSFT has pulled back from 517.78 to 492.44, a modest ~5% giveback so far. Nothing on this chart says that pullback is done or that it isn't. What the chart does say: the 349.20 low, the 377.39 higher low, and the gap zone around 390-438 are the reference points that matter if this pullback keeps going. No forecast, no position, just the sequence as it actually happened. META Mid-Term potential range tradeThis is a good setup for a mid-term move. I already have a solid entry around the 600 area.
Structure
As I explained on the chart, price tested the AVWAP anchored from the previous local high multiple times.
If you’ve read my previous posts, this is one of the core ideas in my framework:
Multiple tests can indicate progressive absorption.
Repeated testing alone is not enough, but the valid breakout on expanding volume helps confirm that the absorption process was real.
Bigger Range Still Matters
META is still trading inside a large 540–690 range.
Until price breaks out of this range with real momentum and acceptance, I still treat it as a range-bound structure.
Within the current lower-liquidity area, price has room to travel from boundary to boundary, carrying momentum from the 600–620 zone.
Relative Positioning
META is relatively undervalued and under-positioned within the Mag 7, which gives it a better cushion if broader market conditions deteriorate.
That doesn’t make it immune to market weakness, but relative positioning matters when capital starts rotating.
The Main Unknown: Broad Market Risk
The biggest uncertainty here is not META itself — it’s the overall market environment.
We have several potential risks ahead:
FOMC coming in roughly two weeks
Hot NFP report
Inflation risk still unresolved
Any of these could slow or stagger the move even if META’s individual structure remains constructive.
Positioning
If you’re looking to trade this setup, I would give it enough time to develop.
For me, that means either:
Shares, or
Longer-dated options with at least ~3 months of duration
This is not the kind of setup I’d want to force with very short-dated contracts. 
Long
Long
Short
Short 
